<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faux News analyst Trotta &#8216;apologizes&#8217; for assassination remarks</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Foucault</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519283</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 17:21:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519283</guid>
					<description>I'm sorry if I offended your sensibilities, GreyLadyBeast. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m sorry if I offended your sensibilities, GreyLadyBeast. <img src='http://pandagon.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ms Kate</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519281</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:36:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519281</guid>
					<description>Wow.  Now I really want to vote for Hillary.  That's some truly effective activism there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow.  Now I really want to vote for Hillary.  That&#8217;s some truly effective activism there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GreyLadyBast</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519278</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:58:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519278</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Most women are people, &lt;/i&gt;

That is utterly appalling, and NOT something an actual feminist would say about ANY woman.

You are no feminist, support for the rights of the slutty or no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Most women are people, </i></p>
	<p>That is utterly appalling, and NOT something an actual feminist would say about ANY woman.</p>
	<p>You are no feminist, support for the rights of the slutty or no.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foucault</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519272</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:57:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519272</guid>
					<description>
&quot;This is true BUT deceiving your partner into thinking you are monogamous when you are not is not feminism. It is just being a liar. And sleeping around doesn’t make you a feminist.&quot;

And Tom, mind your own business, please. I don't think you're in a position to judge other peoples' relationships, or to decide what is or is not feminist behavior. Who says that sleeping around makes you a feminist? i never argued that position. I simply said that feminism and monogamy do not necessarily go hand in hand.

A lot of sluts are feminists, you know. And feminism respects women's rights to be sluts, to boot! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;This is true BUT deceiving your partner into thinking you are monogamous when you are not is not feminism. It is just being a liar. And sleeping around doesn’t make you a feminist.&#8221;</p>
	<p>And Tom, mind your own business, please. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re in a position to judge other peoples&#8217; relationships, or to decide what is or is not feminist behavior. Who says that sleeping around makes you a feminist? i never argued that position. I simply said that feminism and monogamy do not necessarily go hand in hand.</p>
	<p>A lot of sluts are feminists, you know. And feminism respects women&#8217;s rights to be sluts, to boot!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foucault</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519271</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:15:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519271</guid>
					<description>&quot;That is one HELL of a statement to come from a self-proclaimed feminist. Or do you not actually believe that all women are people?&quot;

Most women are people, but not mnemosyne or Ms. Kate. They are just walking cesspools of slime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;That is one HELL of a statement to come from a self-proclaimed feminist. Or do you not actually believe that all women are people?&#8221;</p>
	<p>Most women are people, but not mnemosyne or Ms. Kate. They are just walking cesspools of slime.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mnemosyne</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519270</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:10:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519270</guid>
					<description>Ah, but Foucault is so much more mature and sophistimacated than all the rest of us provincial, narrow-minded Pandagon commenters.  After all, she says so herself, so it must be true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, but Foucault is so much more mature and sophistimacated than all the rest of us provincial, narrow-minded Pandagon commenters.  After all, she says so herself, so it must be true!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519265</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:37:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519265</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Monogamy doesn’t necessarily hold a relationship together, and nor is it a prerequisite for feminist.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is true BUT deceiving your partner into thinking you are monogamous when you are not is not feminism.  It is just being a liar.  And sleeping around doesn't make you a feminist.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Monogamy doesn’t necessarily hold a relationship together, and nor is it a prerequisite for feminist.</p></blockquote>
	<p>This is true BUT deceiving your partner into thinking you are monogamous when you are not is not feminism.  It is just being a liar.  And sleeping around doesn&#8217;t make you a feminist.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GreyLadyBast</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519264</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:30:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519264</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Foucault
May 28, 2008 at 11:21 pm 

I meant that you are the “what,” as opposed to a “who.” I don’t view you as a “who.” Take those knitting needles and stick them where they really belong. &lt;/i&gt;

That is one HELL of a statement to come from a self-proclaimed feminist.  Or do you not actually believe that all women are people?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Foucault<br />
May 28, 2008 at 11:21 pm </p>
	<p>I meant that you are the “what,” as opposed to a “who.” I don’t view you as a “who.” Take those knitting needles and stick them where they really belong. </i></p>
	<p>That is one HELL of a statement to come from a self-proclaimed feminist.  Or do you not actually believe that all women are people?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foucault</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519254</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:28:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519254</guid>
					<description>I'm sure you and cows have a lot in common, anyhow. Only they are probably a lot more sexy and fun than you. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m sure you and cows have a lot in common, anyhow. Only they are probably a lot more sexy and fun than you. <img src='http://pandagon.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foucault</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519253</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:21:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/27/faux-news-analyst-trotta-apologizes-for-assassination-remarks/#comment-519253</guid>
					<description>I meant that you are the &quot;what,&quot; as opposed to a &quot;who.&quot; I don't view you as a &quot;who.&quot; Take those knitting needles and stick them where they really belong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I meant that you are the &#8220;what,&#8221; as opposed to a &#8220;who.&#8221; I don&#8217;t view you as a &#8220;who.&#8221; Take those knitting needles and stick them where they really belong.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

