Oh my. Just watch. This administration cannot end soon enough. Oh my. Just watch. This administration cannot end soon enough. Olbermann shows a pic of Dear Leader playing golf two months after he claimed he stopped playing “in solidarity” with grieving families who lost loved ones in his Iraq nightmare. That was bad enough, but his sacrifice wasn’t even his own idea, so his handlers even saw this as some sort of noble gesture to spin — it’s an administration of completely morally and ethically bankrupt people, and KO had enough.
Part 1:
A snippet:
Finally tonight, as promised, a Special Comment on two topics a lot of us had foolishly thought, had naively hoped, we would not again have to address… and a third topic nobody thought a president would ever seriously mention in public unless perhaps he’d just been hit in the head with something and was not in full possession of his faculties - how he expressed his “empathy” to the families of the dead in Iraq - by giving up golf.Part 2:The President has resorted anew to the sleaziest fear-mongering and mass manipulation of an administration - of a public life - dedicated to realizing the lowest of our expectations.
Full transcript is below the fold.
Via C&L:
Finally tonight, as promised, a Special Comment on two topics a lot of us had foolishly thought, had naively hoped, we would not again have to address… and a third topic nobody thought a president would ever seriously mention in public unless perhaps he’d just been hit in the head with something and was not in full possession of his faculties — how he expressed his “empathy” to the families of the dead in Iraq — by giving up golf.The President has resorted anew to the sleaziest fear-mongering and mass manipulation of an administration — of a public life — dedicated to realizing the lowest of our expectations.
And he has now applied these poisons to the 2008 presidential election, on behalf of the party at whose center he and Mr. McCain lurk.
Mr. Bush has predicted that the election of a Democratic president could, “eventually lead to another attack on the United States.”
This ludicrous, infuriating, holier-than-thou and most importantly bone-headedly wrong statement came yesterday during an interview with Politico-dot-com and on-line users of Yahoo.
The question was phrased as follows: “If we were to pull out of Iraq next year, what’s the worst that could happen, what’s the doomsday scenario?”
The President replied: “Doomsday scenario, of course, is that extremists throughout the Middle East would be emboldened, which would eventually lead to another attack on the United States.
The biggest issue we face is — it’s bigger than Iraq — it’s this ideological struggle against cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives.”
Mr. Bush, at long last, has it not dawned on you that the America you have now created, includes ‘cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives’?’
They are those in, or formerly in, your employ, who may yet be charged some day with war crimes.
Through your haze of self-congratulation and self-pity, do you still have no earthly clue that this nation has laid waste to Iraq to achieve your political objectives?
‘This ideological struggle,’ Mr. Bush, is taking place within this country.
It is a struggle between Americans who cherish freedom — ours and everybody else’s — and Americans like you, sir, to whom freedom is just a brand name, just like “Patriot Act” is a brand name or “Protect America” is a brand name.
But wait, there’s more.
You also said “Iraq is the place where al Qaeda and other extremists have made their stand — and they will be defeated.”
They made no “stand” in Iraq, sir. You allowed them to assemble there!
As certainly as if that were the plan, the borders were left wide open by your government’s farcical post-invasion strategy of ‘they’ll greet us as liberators.’
And as certainly as if that were the plan, the inspiration for another generation of terrorists in another country was provided by your government’s farcical post-invasion strategy of letting the societal infra-structure of Iraq dissolve, to be replaced by an American Vice-Royalty enforced by merciless mercenaries who shoot unarmed Iraqis and then evade prosecution in any country, by hiding behind your skirts, sir.
Terrorism inside Iraq is your creation, Mr. Bush!
It was a Yahoo user who brought up the second topic upon whose introduction Mr. Bush should have passed, or punted, or gotten up and left the room claiming he heard Dick Cheney calling him.
“Do you feel,” asked an ordinary American, “that you were mis-led on Iraq?”
“I feel like — I felt like, there were weapons of mass destruction. You know, “mislead” is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional — I don’t think so, I think there was a — not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was.”
Flawed.
You, Mr. Bush, and your tragically know-it-all minions, threw out every piece of intelligence that suggested there were no such weapons.
You, Mr. Bush, threw out every person who suggested that the sober, contradictory, reality-based intelligence needed to be listened to, fast.
You, Mr. Bush, are responsible for how “intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment.”
You and the sycophants you dredged up and put behind the most important steering wheel in the world propagated palpable nonsense and shoved it down the throat of every intelligence community across the world and punished anybody who didn’t agree it was really chicken salad.
And you, Mr. Bush, threw under the bus all of the subsequent critics who bravely stepped forward later to point out just how much of a self-fulfilling prophecy you had embraced, and adopted as this country’s policy — in lieu of, say, common sense.
The fiasco of pre-war intelligence, sir, is your fiasco.
You should build a great statue of yourself turning a deaf ear to the warnings of realists, while you are shown embracing the three-card monte dealers like Richard Perle and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.
That would be a far more fitting tribute to your legacy, Mr. Bush, than this presidential library you are constructing as a giant fable about your presidency, an edifice you might as claim was built from Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction because there will be just as many of those inside your presidential library as there were inside Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
Of course if there is one over-riding theme to this president’s administration it is the utter, always-failing, inability to know when to quit when it is behind.
And so Mr. Bush answered yet another question about this layered, nuanced, wheels-within-wheels garbage heap that constituted his excuse for war.
“And so you feel that you didn’t have all the information you should have or the right spin on that information?”
“No, no,” replied the President. “I was told by people, that they had weapons of mass destruction…”
People?
What people?
The insane informant “Curveball?”
The Iraqi snake-oil salesman Ahmed Chalabi?
The American snake-oil salesman Dick Cheney?
“I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction, as were members of Congress, who voted for the resolution to get rid of Saddam Hussein. And of course, the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes.”
Mr. Bush — you destroyed the evidence that contradicted the resolution you jammed down the Congress’s throat, the way you jammed it down the nation’s throat.
When required by law to verify that your evidence was accurate, you simply re-submitted it, with phrases amounting to “See, I done proved it,” virtually written in the margins in crayon.
You defied patriotic Americans to say “The Emperor has no clothes” — only with the stakes (as you and the mental dwarves in your employ put it) being a “mushroom cloud over an American city.”
And as a final crash of self-indulgent nonsense, when the incontrovertible truth of your panoramic and murderous deceit has even begun to cost your political party seemingly perpetual congressional seats in places like North Carolina and — last night — Mississippi, you can actually say with a straight face, sir, that for members of Congress “the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes” - while you greet the political heat and try to run and hide from your presidency — and your legacy — 4,000 of the Americans you were supposed to protect, dead in Iraq, with your only feeble, pathetic answer being, “I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction.”
Then came Mr. Bush’s final blow to our nation’s solar plexus, his last re-opening of our common wounds, his last remark that makes the rest of us question not merely his leadership or his judgment but his very suitably to remain in office.
“Mr. President,” he was asked, “you haven’t been golfing in recent years. Is that related to Iraq?
“Yes,” began perhaps the most startling reply of this nightmarish blight on our lives as Americans — on our history.
“It really is. I don’t want some mom whose son may have recently died, to see the Commander-in-Chief playing golf. I feel I owe it to the families to be as — to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal.”
Golf, sir?
Golf sends the wrong signal to the grieving families of our men and women butchered in Iraq?
Do you think these families, Mr. Bush — their lives blighted forever — care about you playing golf?
Do you think, sir, they care about you?
You, Mr. Bush, let their sons and daughters be killed.
Sir, to show your solidarity with them - you gave up golf?
Sir, to show your solidarity with them — you didn’t give up your pursuit of this insurance-scam, profiteering, morally and financially bankrupting war.
Sir, to show your solidarity with them — you didn’t even give up talking about Iraq — a subject about which you have incessantly proved without pause or backwards glance, that you may literally be the least informed person in the world?
Sir, to show your solidarity with them, you didn’t give up your presidency?
In your own words — “solidarity as best as I can” — is to stop a game? That is the “best” you can?
4,000 Americans give up their lives and your sacrifice was to give up golf!
Golf.
Not “gulf” — golf.
And still it gets worse.
Because it proves that the President’s unendurable sacrifice, his unbearable pain, the suspension of getting to hit a stick with a ball, was not even his own damned idea.
“Mr. President, was there a particular moment or incident that brought you to that decision, or how did you come to that?”
“I remember when de Mello, who was at the U.N., got killed in Baghdad as a result of these murderers taking this good man’s life. And I was playing golf — I think I was in central Texas — and they pulled me off the golf course and I said, it’s just not worth it any more to do.”
Your one, tone-deaf, arrogant, pathetic, embarrassing gesture, and you didn’t even think of it yourself?
The great Bushian sacrifice — an Army private loses a leg, a Marine loses half his skull, four thousand of their brothers and sisters lose their lives, you lose golf… and they have to pull you off the golf course to get you to just do that?
If it’s even true…
Apart from your medical files, which dutifully record your torn calf muscle and the knee pain which forced you to give up running at the same time — coincidence, no doubt — the bombing in Baghdad which killed Sergio Vieira de Mello of the U-N… and interrupted your round of golf, was on August 19th, 2003.
Yet there is an Associated Press account of you playing golf as late as Columbus Day of that year — October 13th — nearly two months later.
Mr. Bush, I hate to break it to you, six-and-a-half years after you yoked this nation and your place in history to the wrong war, in the wrong place, against the wrong people but the war in Iraq is Not. About. You.
It is not, Mr. Bush, about your grief when American after American comes home in a box.
It is not, Mr. Bush, about what your addled brain has produced in the way of paranoid delusions of risks that do not exist, ready to be activated if some Democrat, and not your twin Mr. McCain succeeds you.
The war in Iraq — your war, Mr. Bush — is about how you accomplished the derangement of two nations, and how you helped funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to lascivious and perennially thirsty corporations like Halliburton and Blackwater, and how you sent 4,000 Americans to their deaths — for nothing.
It is not, Mr. Bush, about your golf game!
And, sir, if you have any hopes that next January 20th will not be celebrated as a day of soul-wrenching, heart-felt Thanksgiving, because your faithless stewardship of this presidency will have finally come to a merciful end, this last piece of advice:
When somebody asks you, sir, about Democrats who must now pull this country back from the abyss you have placed us at…
When somebody asks you, sir, about the cooked books and faked threats you foisted on a sincere and frightened nation…
When somebody asks you, sir, about your gallant, noble, self-abnegating sacrifice of your golf game so as to soothe the families of the war dead…
This advice, Mr. Bush…
Shut the hell up!
31 Responses to “Keith Olbermann smackdown of Bush’s fearmongering and golf sacrifice lie”
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>






Perfect.
Wow! Uhhh, yeah.
One thing puzzles me: what’s up with de Bello? Twenty two people died that day, including three Americans. Nearly three hundred US troops had already been killed. He ignores them and gives up golf for a Brazilian?
Oh, thank you for posting this. It just made me all warm and fuzzy.
Watercat, no doubt the focus on de Mello is that he was a pretty high-ranking UN official… I’m running out the door so I don’t have time to look it up now, but I remember when that happened a lot of shock that someone not “boots on the ground” could be killed.
OH, hell yeah!
KO’s finest hour.
omg my head hurts. I’m not used to mainlining truth like that from TV. It’s damn near heartening.
“See I done proved it.” lmao
Gold.
just slightly over the top and partisan, yet at its core, perhaps the finest and most damning piece of political commentary every written, much less shown in our media.
the problem is Keith uses too many polysyllabic words for Billy Joe Jim Bob to understand what he’s saying
Much love for Keith Olbermann. It’s all I have to say.
You just know that “hell” wasn’t the word he really wanted to use in that last line.
As a devoted Olbermaniac I was watching yesterday when he delivered that. And yeah, it was really obvious from the delivery that “hell” was not the word he wanted in that last sentence.
This is why I started watching Olbermann and it was one of his very best.
MKK
Thanks for including the transcript. It’s really helpful for those of us whose internet connections aren’t up to streaming video.
“I remember when de Mello, who was at the U.N., got killed in Baghdad as a result of these murderers taking this good man’s life. And I was playing golf — I think I was in central Texas — and they pulled me off the golf course and I said, it’s just not worth it any more to do.”
De Mello was killed on August 19th, 2003, and Bush played golf on October 19th, 2003.
According to the Post, “In his first three years in office, Bush played golf 16 times. But, according to the White House’s unofficial statistician, CBS News’s Mark Knoller, Bush has not teed off since Oct. 13, 2003. Some muse that Bush was cowed by filmmaker Michael Moore’s mocking of Bush’s golf habit in “Fahrenheit 9/11″ which featured footage of Bush mixing remarks on Middle East violence with a command to “watch this drive.” But Bush’s golf ban far predates the Moore film and seems to coincide with Bush’s discovery of mountain biking — a better sport for appealing to the common man.”
I need a cigarette . . .
You know, considering that Bush Mark II considers Winston Churchill as one of his personal heroes…I would say that Mr. Olbermann’s response was an exemplar of Churchillian political oratory at its finest.
My hope and dream is that our next president hands Dear Leader over to the The Hague where he is prosecuted for war crimes and then spends the rest of his life in some dark, dreary European prison.
Most of that I liked except the complaint about the golf. Bush didn’t say he was sacrificing by not playing golf. He didn’t volunteer things he was giving up because of the war and included golf. He was asked a specific question and (clumsily) answered that it was unseemly for him to be playing golf while we are at war. He’s right on that score. If he were playing we’d see pictures with captions like “Bush blasts out of sand trap while troops are blasted in Iraq.” And Oberman would probably be highlighting it. I didn’t see it as Bush claiming it was any big deal or big sacrifice.
He didn’t volunteer things he was giving up because of the war and included golf. He was asked a specific question and (clumsily) answered that it was unseemly for him to be playing golf while we are at war.
Bush claimed that he gave up playing golf after he was informed of Sergio Vieria de Mello’s death while he was on the links when in fact he didn’t stop playing until two months later. You may want to, you know, read the story before you make any additional excuses for him.
He is playing.
Read the speech again. The whole thing. Kthxbai.
Also, sixties liberal, the interview question was obviously a planned lead-in question. It was something like, “I’ve noticed you haven’t played golf recently. Does this have something to do with Iraq?”
The interviewer is not going to guess about Iraq being related to golf (because, huh?) unless he already knew the answer. So, Bush and or his handlers must have gave him the question because they wanted to showcase this big sacrifice Bush had made. Otherwise, any interviewer worth his salt might have just assumed he gave up golf due to his knee injuries that happened at the same time.
So, they obviously wanted Bush to talk about this “sacrifice” and they obviously were so clueless as to think it would put him in a good light.
And Eisenhower had no problems golfing during the Korean War or WWII. He averaged a round about every 3 days while he was in office. What a disingenuous asshole.
I’m not making excuses for Bush. I’m just saying that including the golf “sacrifice” comment is not much of a point, particularly compared to the atrocities of going to war in Iraq and the poor planning and bumbling Oberman otherwise excoriates well.
The DeMello fib is annoying, in the indifference-to-the-truth tradition of Clinton (pick one) and Reagan, but hardly in the same class as the WMD lie.
Eisenhower got a lot of criticism for playing so much golf. This string put me onto a book I’d like to read, “First Off the Tee: Presidential Hackers, Duffers, and Cheaters from Taft to Bush” By Don Van Natta, and a reviewer of the book pointed out:
I think that is the whole point about the golf “sacrifice.” Not that it is the worst thing he has done in his administration - just a really, jaw dropping display of complete disconnection with reality.
The prick has never had to sacrifice anything in his life, except his loves for booze and Texas booger sugar. I’m sure the golf thing really is a sacrifice to him.
And while Kennedy may not have wanted to be photographed playing he is widely regarded as the best presidential golfer ever. His playing was curbed by back troubles more than not wanting to appear unseemly.
Wow. I have GOT to read/watch more Keith Olbermann. I’ve heard him say things like this now and again, and it floors me every time.
The good thing at the moment is that maybe a few more people will be nodding along and agreeing with him at home this time than they would have a few years ago.
Poppy Bush didn’t know how to work a supermarket cash register, and Junior doesn’t know sacrifice from shine-ola. The reasons to vote for people who aren’t silver-spoonfed gentry multiply.
I want to marry Olberman in California. And I’m a straight guy…
I think Olbermann knows Bush watch him! lol.
I love it.
(Nightmarish blight.. he can say that again)
(flicks lighter)
FREEBIRD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don’t care if he is “a good old boy” either … truth is always welcome from whatever messenger it hails from.
Olbermann for President.
Keith’s such a dear. Pity he’s going to get picked up for sedition one of these days…
…dear god, I love that man. That was amazing.