<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freeper, fundie heads exploding over CA marriage ruling</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bananaphone</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516590</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516590</guid>
					<description>It cracks me up that so many people think that children are so fragile that the idea of two men married will break them.  I've found that children are remarkably flexible: much more so than their adult counterparts.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It cracks me up that so many people think that children are so fragile that the idea of two men married will break them.  I&#8217;ve found that children are remarkably flexible: much more so than their adult counterparts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: KeithM</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516549</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:24:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516549</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Seriously, what’s the with the big deal over explaining it to kids? “Children, this is Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones. They’re husbands.” Or “They’re spouses.” End of explanation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why the convoluted explanation?  &quot;They're married.&quot;  Full stop.

&lt;i&gt;Canada's Worst Driver 3&lt;/i&gt; had a gay couple from Vancouver on the show.   When they did the intro to the drivers in each episode they simple said &quot;This is Jason, nominated by his husband Adrian.&quot;  It was absolutely no big deal at all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Seriously, what’s the with the big deal over explaining it to kids? “Children, this is Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones. They’re husbands.” Or “They’re spouses.” End of explanation.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Why the convoluted explanation?  &#8220;They&#8217;re married.&#8221;  Full stop.</p>
	<p><i>Canada&#8217;s Worst Driver 3</i> had a gay couple from Vancouver on the show.   When they did the intro to the drivers in each episode they simple said &#8220;This is Jason, nominated by his husband Adrian.&#8221;  It was absolutely no big deal at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516538</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:05:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516538</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Meanwhile you will have to explain to your young children, how Mr. Jones and Mr. Smith can be man and “wife”&lt;/i&gt;

Translation: How do you tell the kids which one is the property?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Meanwhile you will have to explain to your young children, how Mr. Jones and Mr. Smith can be man and “wife”</i></p>
	<p>Translation: How do you tell the kids which one is the property?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nightsky</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516513</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:19:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516513</guid>
					<description>I love Our Peter: to heck with marriage as a fundamental human right, and committed couples celebrating the fact that they can finally inherit and qualify for health insurance and visit each other in the hospital... no, first thing he thinks of is TEH BUTTSECKS.  Yet more proof that the freepi spend waaaaaay more time thinking about gay sex than actual gay people.

&amp;gt;Meanwhile you will have to explain to your young children, how Mr. Jones and Mr. Smith can be man and “wife”

&quot;I don't think women should be doctors!  I don't want to have to explain to my young child that 'Dr. Smith' is a WOMAN!&quot;  

Seriously, what's the with the big deal over explaining it to kids?  &quot;Children, this is Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones.  They're husbands.&quot;  Or &quot;They're spouses.&quot;  End of explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I love Our Peter: to heck with marriage as a fundamental human right, and committed couples celebrating the fact that they can finally inherit and qualify for health insurance and visit each other in the hospital&#8230; no, first thing he thinks of is TEH BUTTSECKS.  Yet more proof that the freepi spend waaaaaay more time thinking about gay sex than actual gay people.</p>
	<p>&gt;Meanwhile you will have to explain to your young children, how Mr. Jones and Mr. Smith can be man and “wife”</p>
	<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think women should be doctors!  I don&#8217;t want to have to explain to my young child that &#8216;Dr. Smith&#8217; is a WOMAN!&#8221;  </p>
	<p>Seriously, what&#8217;s the with the big deal over explaining it to kids?  &#8220;Children, this is Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones.  They&#8217;re husbands.&#8221;  Or &#8220;They&#8217;re spouses.&#8221;  End of explanation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pennylane</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516502</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:52:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516502</guid>
					<description>I just wanted to add that these horrible judicial activist judges on the CA Supreme Court?  Only one was a Democrat.  Oh those Republican bastards.   I hope New Jersey steps up and is the first state to pass a marriage bill legislatively (I know CA has done so--but Gov. Corzine has agreed to sign it into law).  No judicial activism there.  

I hope this becomes a shitstorm for the Republicans because now McCain is going to have to go on a right-wing appeasing tour.  Eh, who am I kidding.  He will continue to pander and the media will continue to lick his boots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just wanted to add that these horrible judicial activist judges on the CA Supreme Court?  Only one was a Democrat.  Oh those Republican bastards.   I hope New Jersey steps up and is the first state to pass a marriage bill legislatively (I know CA has done so&#8211;but Gov. Corzine has agreed to sign it into law).  No judicial activism there.  </p>
	<p>I hope this becomes a shitstorm for the Republicans because now McCain is going to have to go on a right-wing appeasing tour.  Eh, who am I kidding.  He will continue to pander and the media will continue to lick his boots.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: adobedragon</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516410</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:34:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516410</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ok guys, happy fudgepacking, just take it easy on those poor gerbils, don’t want those PETA heads getting on your ass. Till next time. GOD BLESS!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Huh.  Cookie seems to know an awful lot about supposed homosexual practices.  Why are the fundies so obsessed with anal sex and, as Trollhouse's comment would indicate, rodents?

I reckon the small pets in the Trollhouse household should be afraid, very afraid.

Step away from the gerbil, troll boy.

And doncha love the little, all-caps, &quot;God bless&quot; at the end? It's like he's saying, &quot;I hate you, but here, have a helping of lurve from my imaginary sky daddy.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>ok guys, happy fudgepacking, just take it easy on those poor gerbils, don’t want those PETA heads getting on your ass. Till next time. GOD BLESS!</p></blockquote>
	<p>Huh.  Cookie seems to know an awful lot about supposed homosexual practices.  Why are the fundies so obsessed with anal sex and, as Trollhouse&#8217;s comment would indicate, rodents?</p>
	<p>I reckon the small pets in the Trollhouse household should be afraid, very afraid.</p>
	<p>Step away from the gerbil, troll boy.</p>
	<p>And doncha love the little, all-caps, &#8220;God bless&#8221; at the end? It&#8217;s like he&#8217;s saying, &#8220;I hate you, but here, have a helping of lurve from my imaginary sky daddy.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516404</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:25:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516404</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;I half wonder if the Catholic Church is so upset, in part, because stable and committed homosexual males marrying each other means fewer potential priests. Hey, they might have to allow women to lead mass!&lt;/i&gt;

There's always the NAMBLA crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>I half wonder if the Catholic Church is so upset, in part, because stable and committed homosexual males marrying each other means fewer potential priests. Hey, they might have to allow women to lead mass!</i></p>
	<p>There&#8217;s always the NAMBLA crowd.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ms Kate</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516402</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:20:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516402</guid>
					<description>But Hector, if they all get married it means fewer assclown-fetish boyfriends for him to cheat on his wife with!

I half wonder if the Catholic Church is so upset, in part, because stable and committed homosexual males marrying each other means fewer potential priests.  Hey, they might have to allow women to lead mass!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>But Hector, if they all get married it means fewer assclown-fetish boyfriends for him to cheat on his wife with!</p>
	<p>I half wonder if the Catholic Church is so upset, in part, because stable and committed homosexual males marrying each other means fewer potential priests.  Hey, they might have to allow women to lead mass!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hector B.</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516395</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:05:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516395</guid>
					<description>cookie, since you are fascinated with asses, I would suggest that gay couples' getting married is no skin off yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>cookie, since you are fascinated with asses, I would suggest that gay couples&#8217; getting married is no skin off yours.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mnemosyne</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516380</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:38:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/15/freeper-fundie-heads-exploding-over-ca-marriage-ruling/#comment-516380</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;What a sad day in America, but is it any real suprise, it is California. What a sad, sad day!&lt;/i&gt;

Yep, nothing worse than people who have been living together happily for a dozen years getting married.  I mean, really, what is the world coming to when people are actually allowed to marry people they love instead of the people their parents choose for them?

Personally, the only downside for me is that I get to hear fulminations from the pulpit at my cousin's Catholic wedding about how this is the End Of Civilization.  I can't decide if I want to have a massive, uncontrollable coughing fit or if I just want to walk out and tour the mission's gardens for the rest of the mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>What a sad day in America, but is it any real suprise, it is California. What a sad, sad day!</i></p>
	<p>Yep, nothing worse than people who have been living together happily for a dozen years getting married.  I mean, really, what is the world coming to when people are actually allowed to marry people they love instead of the people their parents choose for them?</p>
	<p>Personally, the only downside for me is that I get to hear fulminations from the pulpit at my cousin&#8217;s Catholic wedding about how this is the End Of Civilization.  I can&#8217;t decide if I want to have a massive, uncontrollable coughing fit or if I just want to walk out and tour the mission&#8217;s gardens for the rest of the mass.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
