<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qs of the day - American Catholics and Pope Benedict</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: hbsweet, empress of ice cream</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509487</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:45:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509487</guid>
					<description>@Doctor Science: 
Those things over the crosses are actually pins: they hold that band of fabric (called a &quot;pallium&quot;) in place, and they're supposed to represent the nails of the cross.
In case you were wondering. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Doctor Science:<br />
Those things over the crosses are actually pins: they hold that band of fabric (called a &#8220;pallium&#8221;) in place, and they&#8217;re supposed to represent the nails of the cross.<br />
In case you were wondering.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phoenician in a time of Romans</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509397</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:34:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509397</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;2) Probably not. The Catholic Church does change, but it has the tendency to do so with all the speed of a half-dead snail in a puddle of maple syrup. (Yes, Andrew, even in regards to moral teachings. The current doctrine about homosexuality had to have come about in this century, as there would have been no way for the church to recognize homosexuality as an orientation when absolutely no one was recognizing it as such.)&lt;/i&gt;

The Church has been around for two thousand years.  What you see as a bug may well be a feature.

It may well be that the Church will still be around when feminism, liberalism, progressivism are seen in the same light as Marxism is today.  Should there be an ecopocalypse with global warming, my money is on the bloody Catholic Church surviving rather than all those worthwhile movements based on assumptions of equality and fair play which, ultimately, rest on a high level of social wealth and technological freedom.

There is nothing but our opinion to say that our ideals are more valid than those of Ratzi, and plenty of evidence to suggest that the latter can, at least, stand the test of time. Not particularly nice to own up to, but there you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>2) Probably not. The Catholic Church does change, but it has the tendency to do so with all the speed of a half-dead snail in a puddle of maple syrup. (Yes, Andrew, even in regards to moral teachings. The current doctrine about homosexuality had to have come about in this century, as there would have been no way for the church to recognize homosexuality as an orientation when absolutely no one was recognizing it as such.)</i></p>
	<p>The Church has been around for two thousand years.  What you see as a bug may well be a feature.</p>
	<p>It may well be that the Church will still be around when feminism, liberalism, progressivism are seen in the same light as Marxism is today.  Should there be an ecopocalypse with global warming, my money is on the bloody Catholic Church surviving rather than all those worthwhile movements based on assumptions of equality and fair play which, ultimately, rest on a high level of social wealth and technological freedom.</p>
	<p>There is nothing but our opinion to say that our ideals are more valid than those of Ratzi, and plenty of evidence to suggest that the latter can, at least, stand the test of time. Not particularly nice to own up to, but there you go.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ismone</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509366</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:15:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509366</guid>
					<description>To MP:  Wow, thanks a lot for letting me know about that--priests like him are what I loved about being a practicing Catholic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>To MP:  Wow, thanks a lot for letting me know about that&#8211;priests like him are what I loved about being a practicing Catholic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mychals Prayer</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509303</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:53:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509303</guid>
					<description>When the Pope visits Ground Zero, he will be greeted by a vigil honoring the late FDNY chaplain, Father Mychal Judge, the first official casualty of the 9/11 attacks.    

Mychal was considered a living saint by many even prior to his heroic death.  His extraordinary works of compassion have been compared to Mother Teresa (see http://SaintMychalJudge.blogspot.com )  

But ironically, Fr. Mychal Judge would be barred from the priesthood today because he was openly gay, though celibate.  He often asked, “Is there so much love in the world that we can afford to discriminate against any kind of love ?!”

We have no illusions that this pope is going to change.  Rather, we are bearing witness to two truths -- that God created and loves gay people, and that the pope does not speak for the whole Church, the Ecclesia, on these matters.

Indeed, two-thirds of U.S. Catholics-in-the-pews reject the pope’s views and support either civil unions or full marriage rights, according to numerous surveys.   

As Fr. Mychal also said, &quot;Don't let the (institutional) church get in the way of your relationship with God.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When the Pope visits Ground Zero, he will be greeted by a vigil honoring the late FDNY chaplain, Father Mychal Judge, the first official casualty of the 9/11 attacks.    </p>
	<p>Mychal was considered a living saint by many even prior to his heroic death.  His extraordinary works of compassion have been compared to Mother Teresa (see <a href='http://SaintMychalJudge.blogspot.com' rel='nofollow'>http://SaintMychalJudge.blogspot.com</a> )  </p>
	<p>But ironically, Fr. Mychal Judge would be barred from the priesthood today because he was openly gay, though celibate.  He often asked, “Is there so much love in the world that we can afford to discriminate against any kind of love ?!”</p>
	<p>We have no illusions that this pope is going to change.  Rather, we are bearing witness to two truths &#8212; that God created and loves gay people, and that the pope does not speak for the whole Church, the Ecclesia, on these matters.</p>
	<p>Indeed, two-thirds of U.S. Catholics-in-the-pews reject the pope’s views and support either civil unions or full marriage rights, according to numerous surveys.   </p>
	<p>As Fr. Mychal also said, &#8220;Don&#8217;t let the (institutional) church get in the way of your relationship with God.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mychals Prayer</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509301</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:49:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509301</guid>
					<description>When the Pope visits Ground Zero, he will be greeted by a vigil honoring the late FDNY chaplain, Father Mychal Judge, the first official casualty of the 9/11 attacks.    

Mychal was considered a living saint by many even prior to his heroic death.  His extraordinary works of compassion have been compared to Mother Teresa (see http://SaintMychalJudge.blogspot.com )  

But ironically, Fr. Mychal Judge would be barred from the priesthood today because he was openly gay, though celibate.  He often asked, “Is there so much love in the world that we can afford to discriminate against any kind of love ?!”

We have no illusions that this pope is going to change.  Rather, we are bearing witness to two truths -- that God created and loves gay people, and that the pope does not speak for the whole Church, the Ecclesia, on these matters.

Indeed, two-thirds of U.S. Catholics-in-the-pews reject the pope’s views and support either civil unions or full marriage rights, according to numerous surveys.   

As Fr. Mychal also said, &quot;Don't let the (institutional) church get in the way of your relationship with God.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When the Pope visits Ground Zero, he will be greeted by a vigil honoring the late FDNY chaplain, Father Mychal Judge, the first official casualty of the 9/11 attacks.    </p>
	<p>Mychal was considered a living saint by many even prior to his heroic death.  His extraordinary works of compassion have been compared to Mother Teresa (see <a href='http://SaintMychalJudge.blogspot.com' rel='nofollow'>http://SaintMychalJudge.blogspot.com</a> )  </p>
	<p>But ironically, Fr. Mychal Judge would be barred from the priesthood today because he was openly gay, though celibate.  He often asked, “Is there so much love in the world that we can afford to discriminate against any kind of love ?!”</p>
	<p>We have no illusions that this pope is going to change.  Rather, we are bearing witness to two truths &#8212; that God created and loves gay people, and that the pope does not speak for the whole Church, the Ecclesia, on these matters.</p>
	<p>Indeed, two-thirds of U.S. Catholics-in-the-pews reject the pope’s views and support either civil unions or full marriage rights, according to numerous surveys.   </p>
	<p>As Fr. Mychal also said, &#8220;Don&#8217;t let the (institutional) church get in the way of your relationship with God.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hbsweet, empress of ice cream</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509242</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:55:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509242</guid>
					<description>Reasons I Respect, Admire, and Yes. Love, Dammit, the Catholic Church
-The ritual of the mass is very beautiful: the music, the language of celebration, the candles--it's uplifting
-Being part of a faith community is also uplifting
-The Church can, and often does, provide basic human services for people desperately in need

Why I Can't Go Any More
-I'm tired of being asked for money, over and over and over (Say it with me, fellow Catholics: &quot;Today's second collection is for...&quot;)
-I'm tired of the hypocrisy (&quot;Sex is Bad--unless priests are having it with unwilling children.&quot; &quot;We're the Richest Organization on Earth--but we need more of YOUR money.&quot;)
-I'm tired of being asked to write post cards to my senators and representatives asking them to ban abortion (walked out on that almost as often as I walk out on the Archbishop's Annual Appeal)
-the Church's positions on birth control, women, celibacy for clergy, infertility (apparently, it's only God's decision who gets to have babies: asking a doctor for help is immoral),homosexuality, etc., etc.

I used to try and ignore the parts I disagreed with, but sat through too many sermons where they knocked the &quot;Cafeteria Catholics&quot; who think we can pick and choose which doctrines to believe in: the party line is &quot;all or nothing.&quot;  I don't see that attitude changing at my local parish level any time soon; I certainly don't see the Church hierarchy suddenly becoming flexible and all-embracing.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Reasons I Respect, Admire, and Yes. Love, Dammit, the Catholic Church<br />
-The ritual of the mass is very beautiful: the music, the language of celebration, the candles&#8211;it&#8217;s uplifting<br />
-Being part of a faith community is also uplifting<br />
-The Church can, and often does, provide basic human services for people desperately in need</p>
	<p>Why I Can&#8217;t Go Any More<br />
-I&#8217;m tired of being asked for money, over and over and over (Say it with me, fellow Catholics: &#8220;Today&#8217;s second collection is for&#8230;&#8221;)<br />
-I&#8217;m tired of the hypocrisy (&#8221;Sex is Bad&#8211;unless priests are having it with unwilling children.&#8221; &#8220;We&#8217;re the Richest Organization on Earth&#8211;but we need more of YOUR money.&#8221;)<br />
-I&#8217;m tired of being asked to write post cards to my senators and representatives asking them to ban abortion (walked out on that almost as often as I walk out on the Archbishop&#8217;s Annual Appeal)<br />
-the Church&#8217;s positions on birth control, women, celibacy for clergy, infertility (apparently, it&#8217;s only God&#8217;s decision who gets to have babies: asking a doctor for help is immoral),homosexuality, etc., etc.</p>
	<p>I used to try and ignore the parts I disagreed with, but sat through too many sermons where they knocked the &#8220;Cafeteria Catholics&#8221; who think we can pick and choose which doctrines to believe in: the party line is &#8220;all or nothing.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t see that attitude changing at my local parish level any time soon; I certainly don&#8217;t see the Church hierarchy suddenly becoming flexible and all-embracing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hector B.</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509178</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:29:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509178</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;I reconciled Benedict’s (and the Church’s) positions with my own by leaving the Catholic Church. And if you really want to get the Church’s attention on these issues, you’ll convince your Catholic friends to do the same. Less people in the seats equals less cash in the collection baskets and less power for the Church to wield in our names.&lt;/i&gt;

My sister-in-law got fed up with her pastor and joined an Episcopalian church, so that works.  The Church is trying to figure out what God wants its members to do; if you think what they've decided is bullshit you have to leave the church</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>I reconciled Benedict’s (and the Church’s) positions with my own by leaving the Catholic Church. And if you really want to get the Church’s attention on these issues, you’ll convince your Catholic friends to do the same. Less people in the seats equals less cash in the collection baskets and less power for the Church to wield in our names.</i></p>
	<p>My sister-in-law got fed up with her pastor and joined an Episcopalian church, so that works.  The Church is trying to figure out what God wants its members to do; if you think what they&#8217;ve decided is bullshit you have to leave the church
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wayward</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509176</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:26:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509176</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Many people idolize JPII, and dislike BXVI, without realizing that they espouse the same positions on most things.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Even fewer realize that JPII was the more conservative and authoritarian of the two. 

I'll give BXVI credit for this. He has made perfectly clear the idea that one cannot hold certain liberal views and remain Catholic.  He is right in that the Catholic Church believes what they believe and Catholics should believe what their Church teaches.

I do not agree with what the Catholic Church teaches, therefore I am no longer Catholic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>
Many people idolize JPII, and dislike BXVI, without realizing that they espouse the same positions on most things.
</p></blockquote>
	<p>Even fewer realize that JPII was the more conservative and authoritarian of the two. </p>
	<p>I&#8217;ll give BXVI credit for this. He has made perfectly clear the idea that one cannot hold certain liberal views and remain Catholic.  He is right in that the Catholic Church believes what they believe and Catholics should believe what their Church teaches.</p>
	<p>I do not agree with what the Catholic Church teaches, therefore I am no longer Catholic
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DTG in STL</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509112</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:36:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509112</guid>
					<description>AR in DC -

I went to a Jesuit school for my undergrad work (Saint Louis University), and the University President has been in a seemingly endless battle with the St. Louis Archdiocese for the past 10 years.  Back in 1997, a battle took place over the university's $500MM sale of the university hospital to a private corporation, and then Archbishop Rigali (now Cardinal Rigali, head of Philadelphia archdiocese) was threatening to involve the pope in the land battle.  The school recently opened an $80MM basketball arena on campus, and 10% of the financing came from TIF money - the school was challenged in court by the Masons (establishment clause battle), and somehow the school managed to convince the courts that they were in fact a lay institution with a Catholic identity... whatever that means.  Needless to say, the archbishop wasn't pleased with the university making this claim.

Most recently, Rick Majerus, the new head coach of SLU's NCAA Div. I men's basketball program was seen by a local reporter at a Hillary Clinton rally, and when asked about his beliefs, he said that he was pro-choice and supported embryonic stem-cell research.  The current archbishop was less than pleased, and Bill Donohue of course made a stink about it, with the archbishop essentially demanding that Majerus either renounce his positions, or be fired by the school's president.  Fortunately, neither has happened.

But it does indicate the growing chasm within the church... Jesuit universities, and the Jesuit order in general, seem to be among the more progressive voices within the church - and the traditionalists are none to happy about this - especially when the Jesuits run 28 Catholic Universities in the US.

I doubt I would still be Catholic even if the church as a whole were run the way the Jesuits run their schools, but I would find them to be a far less repulsive institution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>AR in DC -</p>
	<p>I went to a Jesuit school for my undergrad work (Saint Louis University), and the University President has been in a seemingly endless battle with the St. Louis Archdiocese for the past 10 years.  Back in 1997, a battle took place over the university&#8217;s $500MM sale of the university hospital to a private corporation, and then Archbishop Rigali (now Cardinal Rigali, head of Philadelphia archdiocese) was threatening to involve the pope in the land battle.  The school recently opened an $80MM basketball arena on campus, and 10% of the financing came from TIF money - the school was challenged in court by the Masons (establishment clause battle), and somehow the school managed to convince the courts that they were in fact a lay institution with a Catholic identity&#8230; whatever that means.  Needless to say, the archbishop wasn&#8217;t pleased with the university making this claim.</p>
	<p>Most recently, Rick Majerus, the new head coach of SLU&#8217;s NCAA Div. I men&#8217;s basketball program was seen by a local reporter at a Hillary Clinton rally, and when asked about his beliefs, he said that he was pro-choice and supported embryonic stem-cell research.  The current archbishop was less than pleased, and Bill Donohue of course made a stink about it, with the archbishop essentially demanding that Majerus either renounce his positions, or be fired by the school&#8217;s president.  Fortunately, neither has happened.</p>
	<p>But it does indicate the growing chasm within the church&#8230; Jesuit universities, and the Jesuit order in general, seem to be among the more progressive voices within the church - and the traditionalists are none to happy about this - especially when the Jesuits run 28 Catholic Universities in the US.</p>
	<p>I doubt I would still be Catholic even if the church as a whole were run the way the Jesuits run their schools, but I would find them to be a far less repulsive institution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ismone</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509111</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:25:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/15/7050/#comment-509111</guid>
					<description>I'm friends with some priests, Bernarda.  Way to generalize.  I acknowledge that their were pedophiles, and the church hierarchy protected them, and should not have.  But my archdiocese and my priests did not.

Protestant ministers molest, and it is swept under the rug.  Catholic priests molest, it is swept under the rug, it comes out, and people who already were bigoted against Catholics call for the church's destruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m friends with some priests, Bernarda.  Way to generalize.  I acknowledge that their were pedophiles, and the church hierarchy protected them, and should not have.  But my archdiocese and my priests did not.</p>
	<p>Protestant ministers molest, and it is swept under the rug.  Catholic priests molest, it is swept under the rug, it comes out, and people who already were bigoted against Catholics call for the church&#8217;s destruction.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

