<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honoring Dr. King - McCain&#8217;s sorry record</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dicko</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506117</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:50:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506117</guid>
					<description>&quot;McCain’s very partisan record stands in deep contrast to the bipartisan records of Sens. Obama and Clinton.&quot;

Please don't repeat the partisanship bad, bipartisanship good meme. It's really harmful to sane politics. Seriously, think about what you just wrote. Do you think Obama and Clinton are getting high scores from the ACLU, NAACP, and women's groups for their willingness to compromise with Republicans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;McCain’s very partisan record stands in deep contrast to the bipartisan records of Sens. Obama and Clinton.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Please don&#8217;t repeat the partisanship bad, bipartisanship good meme. It&#8217;s really harmful to sane politics. Seriously, think about what you just wrote. Do you think Obama and Clinton are getting high scores from the ACLU, NAACP, and women&#8217;s groups for their willingness to compromise with Republicans?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: calvinhobbes</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506115</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:29:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506115</guid>
					<description>&quot;He now says he “evolved” and regrets that vote.

trick statement, repugs don’t believe in evolution 

Except as it pertains to themselves.

Dubya “evolved” from a drunken screwup to…whatever he is today. McCain “evolved” from a corrupt suckler on Charles Keating’s teat to a fearless reformer. Now he’s “evolving” from a racist panderer to an enlightened (but not too enlightened) believer in racial equality. I swear, these people have parsed evolution more finely than Darwin could have done had he lived to be 500.&quot;

Not to mention that we must all be forced to take them at face value on their evolution the very first time they mention it, whereas when Robert Byrd votes against civil rights legislation but has since regretted it many, many times over, we must forever remind him about it and shame him for it, even as he gets 100% ratings from the NAACP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;He now says he “evolved” and regrets that vote.</p>
	<p>trick statement, repugs don’t believe in evolution </p>
	<p>Except as it pertains to themselves.</p>
	<p>Dubya “evolved” from a drunken screwup to…whatever he is today. McCain “evolved” from a corrupt suckler on Charles Keating’s teat to a fearless reformer. Now he’s “evolving” from a racist panderer to an enlightened (but not too enlightened) believer in racial equality. I swear, these people have parsed evolution more finely than Darwin could have done had he lived to be 500.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Not to mention that we must all be forced to take them at face value on their evolution the very first time they mention it, whereas when Robert Byrd votes against civil rights legislation but has since regretted it many, many times over, we must forever remind him about it and shame him for it, even as he gets 100% ratings from the NAACP.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bitter Scribe</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506096</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:28:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506096</guid>
					<description>Ben---&lt;i&gt;Les mots justes. &lt;/i&gt;Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ben&#8212;<i>Les mots justes. </i>Thank you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: louise</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506083</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:36:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506083</guid>
					<description>One man come in the name of love
One man come and go
One man come, he to justify
One man to overthrow


In the name of love
What more in the name of love
In the name of love
What more in the name of love


One man caught on a barbed wire fence
One man he resist
One man washed on an empty beach.
One man betrayed with a kiss


In the name of love
What more in the name of love
In the name of love
What more in the name of love


(nobody like you...)


Early morning, april 4
Shot rings out in the memphis sky
Free at last, they took your life
They could not take your pride


In the name of love
What more in the name of love
In the name of love
What more in the name of love
In the name of love
What more in the name of love...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One man come in the name of love<br />
One man come and go<br />
One man come, he to justify<br />
One man to overthrow</p>
	<p>In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love<br />
In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love</p>
	<p>One man caught on a barbed wire fence<br />
One man he resist<br />
One man washed on an empty beach.<br />
One man betrayed with a kiss</p>
	<p>In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love<br />
In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love</p>
	<p>(nobody like you&#8230;)</p>
	<p>Early morning, april 4<br />
Shot rings out in the memphis sky<br />
Free at last, they took your life<br />
They could not take your pride</p>
	<p>In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love<br />
In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love<br />
In the name of love<br />
What more in the name of love&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben D.</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506044</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:07:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-506044</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dubya “evolved” from a drunken screwup to…whatever he is today.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A sober screw-up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Dubya “evolved” from a drunken screwup to…whatever he is today.</p></blockquote>
	<p>A sober screw-up?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MikeEss</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505998</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:34:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505998</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Obviously I’m sheltered, because it seems totally bizarre and weird and nigh-incomprehensible to fight *against* a Martin Luther King Day.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

If it was just a fight over whether to honor one man or not, it wouldn't make any sense to be vehemently opposed.

The problem is that MLK is more than a man.  He's a symbolic representative of Blacks in America.

I know I had relatives who didn't understand AT ALL what Dr. King and the others were doing at the time.  Too much white privilege, conservative political views, lower-class background, etc.  They probably never thought for a second how their position in life differed from that of Black Americans, why it was different, and what they could do to help.  

There was also a very vigorous effort, at the time, by the FBI and others to discredit MLK by any and all means - mostly &quot;dirty&quot; - because they saw him as a threat.

So, much later, it was no surprise when some of my relatives were against an MLK holiday.  They were ignorant racists.

And so were most of the others who were against honoring MLK.  They may not have been actual white-sheet-wearing load and violent racists, but they were still racists.

Many of these same people treat the confederate flag as some sort of important symbol  (of freedom/hate/civil-rights...?  I don't know and don't understand).

So when some kind of opportunity comes up for them to express their true feelings, many of them let loose about MLK and his holiday.  He's become some kind of touchstone for exposing closet racists...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>&#8220;Obviously I’m sheltered, because it seems totally bizarre and weird and nigh-incomprehensible to fight *against* a Martin Luther King Day.&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>If it was just a fight over whether to honor one man or not, it wouldn&#8217;t make any sense to be vehemently opposed.</p>
	<p>The problem is that MLK is more than a man.  He&#8217;s a symbolic representative of Blacks in America.</p>
	<p>I know I had relatives who didn&#8217;t understand AT ALL what Dr. King and the others were doing at the time.  Too much white privilege, conservative political views, lower-class background, etc.  They probably never thought for a second how their position in life differed from that of Black Americans, why it was different, and what they could do to help.  </p>
	<p>There was also a very vigorous effort, at the time, by the FBI and others to discredit MLK by any and all means - mostly &#8220;dirty&#8221; - because they saw him as a threat.</p>
	<p>So, much later, it was no surprise when some of my relatives were against an MLK holiday.  They were ignorant racists.</p>
	<p>And so were most of the others who were against honoring MLK.  They may not have been actual white-sheet-wearing load and violent racists, but they were still racists.</p>
	<p>Many of these same people treat the confederate flag as some sort of important symbol  (of freedom/hate/civil-rights&#8230;?  I don&#8217;t know and don&#8217;t understand).</p>
	<p>So when some kind of opportunity comes up for them to express their true feelings, many of them let loose about MLK and his holiday.  He&#8217;s become some kind of touchstone for exposing closet racists&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nenya, Vala of Peanut-Butter Cookies</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505987</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:09:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505987</guid>
					<description>Obviously I'm sheltered, because it seems totally bizarre and weird and nigh-incomprehensible to fight *against* a Martin Luther King Day. Just, what?? And that bit about how MLK wasn't &quot;really&quot; a good black leader is just vile. 

:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Obviously I&#8217;m sheltered, because it seems totally bizarre and weird and nigh-incomprehensible to fight *against* a Martin Luther King Day. Just, what?? And that bit about how MLK wasn&#8217;t &#8220;really&#8221; a good black leader is just vile. </p>
	<p>:(
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: serena kitt</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505892</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:56:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505892</guid>
					<description>McBush hasn't evolved one bit. It would be amazing if racist throwbacks were so mad they stayed home. It would be a great day for America. But somehow, both sides seem to think they need the racist ReaganDixieDemocrats. So we get more candidates taking principled stands *against* the most hard-fought, but still barely-liberal, common-sense gestures toward racial equality. So, pander to the racists, but by golly don't pander to the anti-racists. That would be starting trouble. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>McBush hasn&#8217;t evolved one bit. It would be amazing if racist throwbacks were so mad they stayed home. It would be a great day for America. But somehow, both sides seem to think they need the racist ReaganDixieDemocrats. So we get more candidates taking principled stands *against* the most hard-fought, but still barely-liberal, common-sense gestures toward racial equality. So, pander to the racists, but by golly don&#8217;t pander to the anti-racists. That would be starting trouble.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bitter Scribe</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505869</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:21:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505869</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;trick statement, repugs don’t believe in evolution 

&lt;/i&gt;Except as it pertains to themselves.

Dubya &quot;evolved&quot; from a drunken screwup to...whatever he is today. McCain &quot;evolved&quot; from a corrupt suckler on Charles Keating's teat to a fearless reformer. Now he's &quot;evolving&quot; from a racist panderer to an enlightened (but not &lt;i&gt;too &lt;/i&gt;enlightened) believer in racial equality. I swear, these people have parsed evolution more finely than Darwin could have done had he lived to be 500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>trick statement, repugs don’t believe in evolution </p>
	<p></i>Except as it pertains to themselves.</p>
	<p>Dubya &#8220;evolved&#8221; from a drunken screwup to&#8230;whatever he is today. McCain &#8220;evolved&#8221; from a corrupt suckler on Charles Keating&#8217;s teat to a fearless reformer. Now he&#8217;s &#8220;evolving&#8221; from a racist panderer to an enlightened (but not <i>too </i>enlightened) believer in racial equality. I swear, these people have parsed evolution more finely than Darwin could have done had he lived to be 500.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MikeEss</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505857</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:05:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/04/04/honoring-dr-king-mccains-sorry-record/#comment-505857</guid>
					<description>My dad and McCain are virtually the same age.  

Knowing how far my dad has come, AND knowing how far he still needs to go to approach being reasonable on issues like race, sexism, bigotry against LGBT's, etc., just gives me huge pause when contemplating the possibility of McCain/BushIII.

It would no doubt result in at least 4-more years of delay in our social evolution, and there's a good chance it would result in retrenchment. 

I think this is the strongest reason I support Obama - I'm sick to death of the endless parade of barely distinguishable old white guys who've counted on POTUS as their birthright.

Get out of the way and bring in some fresh perspectives.  The country has never been one color.  Why should POTUS always be white and male?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My dad and McCain are virtually the same age.  </p>
	<p>Knowing how far my dad has come, AND knowing how far he still needs to go to approach being reasonable on issues like race, sexism, bigotry against LGBT&#8217;s, etc., just gives me huge pause when contemplating the possibility of McCain/BushIII.</p>
	<p>It would no doubt result in at least 4-more years of delay in our social evolution, and there&#8217;s a good chance it would result in retrenchment. </p>
	<p>I think this is the strongest reason I support Obama - I&#8217;m sick to death of the endless parade of barely distinguishable old white guys who&#8217;ve counted on POTUS as their birthright.</p>
	<p>Get out of the way and bring in some fresh perspectives.  The country has never been one color.  Why should POTUS always be white and male?&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
