Comments on: Matt Barber’s ‘Concerned Women’ to show up at Wednesday’s pro-Sally Rally

by: Erl

Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:16:41 +0100

Oh, well, that makes sense. The wool is lifted from my eyes!

;)

by: Phoenician in a time of Romans

Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:07:40 +0100

Why is it that when we try to make conservatives apologize for being douches they cry free speech but when they ask us to apologize for “lack of patriotism” they don’t have a problem?

BECAUSE, you lousy LIE-bral, good PATRIOTIC AH-Mericans DIED for the right to FREE SPEECH which you are ABUSING, which NO OTHER COUNTRY in the world has, and for which they are STILL DYING, defending the towns and farms of America over in Iraq. *sniff*

FREE SPEECH is only a right as long as it is kept WITHIN bounds! Commie!!

by: Craig R.

Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:44:33 +0100

One wonder’s what Kern’s view would be of employers were to refuse to hire somebody because the employer was an atheist and the prospective employee was some variety of extreme Christian, and the employer was offended by the congregation’s stance on, effectively, denying access to a living wage to those who were GLBT?

by: Bismarck

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:32:50 +0100

Having read the Gay Agenda, I was wondering if the following statement in item eleven applied to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexual behavior.

“We denounce churches of all faiths which attempt to cause psychological or spiritual abuse or harm to teenagers and youth of homosexual orientation or gender variance.”

by: Bismarck

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:31:50 +0100

Having read the Gay Agenda, I was wondering if the following statement in item eleven applied to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexual behavior.

“We denounce churches of all faiths which attempt to cause psychological or spiritual abuse or harm to teenagers and youth of homosexual orientation or gender variance.”

by: Bill S

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:30:30 +0100

“Sally wasn’t intimidated”?
Oh, really?Seems to me she purposely avoids any contact with anyone who might disagree with her or call her on her bullshit. She even declined an invitation to appear on “The Ellen Degeneres show” because she didn’t want to enter, in her words, “the lion’s den.”
She called ELLEN’s show “the lion’s den”. Think about that-who the fuck is scared of talking to Ellen?
What a wuss.

by: Eric, Rejector of Memes

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:24:29 +0100

I am sick and tired of feeling ashamed of our beautiful state and some of the yayhoos in it.

All states are probably beautiful, until people show up. {sigh}

(And I don’t even LIKE nature!}

by: calliopejane

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:10:14 +0100

Gah!!!! It makes me so stabby the way these people think their right to free speech is protected only if mine is abridged!

Yes, you are free to say disgusting hateful bigoted things without charge or interference from the government or law enforcement. AND I AM FREE TO SAY YOU ARE A DISGUSTING HATEFUL BIGOT!

See how that free-speech thing works JUST THE SAME for BOTH of us? yes?

no of course they don’t see… stab-stab-stabbity-stab!

by: Erl

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:00:43 +0100

Why is it that when we try to make conservatives apologize for being douches they cry free speech but when they ask us to apologize for “lack of patriotism” they don’t have a problem?

by: clytemnestra

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:44:12 +0100

Bitter Scribe
April 1, 2008 at 11:52 am

These people never seem to get it into their exquisitely coiffed heads that “free speech” does NOT mean freedom from criticism.

Oh yes they do, but only when it applies to Democrats, progressives, liberals, anti war protestors, GLBT activists, etc. etc.