<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary, please pay your small vendors.</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: squashed</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-505101</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:34:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-505101</guid>
					<description>I thought this is a hilarious comment:

++

the amount that the two campaigns owed for telephone service at the end of February:

Hillary Clinton:

AT&amp;amp;T:  $8,022.65
Camden Co. Dem. Cmte.: $618.53
Cox Communications: $1,960.22
Embarq: $5,328.32
Frontier Commuications: $2.634.95
Qwest: $33,390.98
Soundpath Conferencing: $87,141.07
Verizon: $4,777.27
TOTAL:  $143,875.99

Barack Obama:

AT&amp;amp;T: $2,266.10
Embarq: $5,380.21
Frontier Communication: $789.74
Qwest: $2,661.17
TOTAL: $11,097.22

If Hillary becomes President, maybe that 3am phone call is met by a recorded message saying, &quot;The number you are calling has been disconnected.&quot;  Is Hillary's the first campaign in history that will end not in a bang, or a whimper, but a fast busy signal?
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/2/83634/73248/403/488768
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I thought this is a hilarious comment:</p>
	<p>++</p>
	<p>the amount that the two campaigns owed for telephone service at the end of February:</p>
	<p>Hillary Clinton:</p>
	<p>AT&amp;T:  $8,022.65<br />
Camden Co. Dem. Cmte.: $618.53<br />
Cox Communications: $1,960.22<br />
Embarq: $5,328.32<br />
Frontier Commuications: $2.634.95<br />
Qwest: $33,390.98<br />
Soundpath Conferencing: $87,141.07<br />
Verizon: $4,777.27<br />
TOTAL:  $143,875.99</p>
	<p>Barack Obama:</p>
	<p>AT&amp;T: $2,266.10<br />
Embarq: $5,380.21<br />
Frontier Communication: $789.74<br />
Qwest: $2,661.17<br />
TOTAL: $11,097.22</p>
	<p>If Hillary becomes President, maybe that 3am phone call is met by a recorded message saying, &#8220;The number you are calling has been disconnected.&#8221;  Is Hillary&#8217;s the first campaign in history that will end not in a bang, or a whimper, but a fast busy signal?<br />
<a href='http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/2/83634/73248/403/488768' rel='nofollow'>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/2/83634/73248/403/488768</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pseudonymous in nc</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504932</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:14:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504932</guid>
					<description>The issue here is the wealth transfer.

We all know that political campaigns essentially take most of their donations, countersign the checks, and send them to local network affiliates and cable companies to pay for TV ads. But it's nice to think that the stuff not feeding mass media monopolies on a bi-annual basis goes to local small businesses.

Hillary isn't just stiffing her staff and small vendors; she's stiffing them in order to pay large media corporations for ads. Those corps get paid on time. They're not stiffable.

(And she's maxed out lots of her donors, meaning that a fair amount of money banked so far is ring-fenced for the general election campaign.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The issue here is the wealth transfer.</p>
	<p>We all know that political campaigns essentially take most of their donations, countersign the checks, and send them to local network affiliates and cable companies to pay for TV ads. But it&#8217;s nice to think that the stuff not feeding mass media monopolies on a bi-annual basis goes to local small businesses.</p>
	<p>Hillary isn&#8217;t just stiffing her staff and small vendors; she&#8217;s stiffing them in order to pay large media corporations for ads. Those corps get paid on time. They&#8217;re not stiffable.</p>
	<p>(And she&#8217;s maxed out lots of her donors, meaning that a fair amount of money banked so far is ring-fenced for the general election campaign.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Purple State Pundit</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504861</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:39:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504861</guid>
					<description>When I took a bus to Columbus, OH with a bunch of people from DC for Obama last month, we all got up and shared why we support Obama. One person had an excellent point which I have used in a lot of conversations with undecided voters: all three candidates are senators, so none have a lot of executive experience, except for running their campaigns. And of the three campaigns, Obama's is the only campaign that has not gone bankrupt. Who do you want managing the federal budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When I took a bus to Columbus, OH with a bunch of people from DC for Obama last month, we all got up and shared why we support Obama. One person had an excellent point which I have used in a lot of conversations with undecided voters: all three candidates are senators, so none have a lot of executive experience, except for running their campaigns. And of the three campaigns, Obama&#8217;s is the only campaign that has not gone bankrupt. Who do you want managing the federal budget?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: seeker6079</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504682</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:22:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504682</guid>
					<description>Serena, we're not allowed to have diaries on McCain. He is all good, all consistent, a total studly repudiation of wafflers, pansies and wishy-washy talkers everywhere.  You ought to be ashamed of yourself for questioning him!  He never makes mistakes!  He...

(Hang on.  Wait a minute.  This isn't the McCain press bus! )

Sorry.  As you were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Serena, we&#8217;re not allowed to have diaries on McCain. He is all good, all consistent, a total studly repudiation of wafflers, pansies and wishy-washy talkers everywhere.  You ought to be ashamed of yourself for questioning him!  He never makes mistakes!  He&#8230;</p>
	<p>(Hang on.  Wait a minute.  This isn&#8217;t the McCain press bus! )</p>
	<p>Sorry.  As you were.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: serena kitt</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504650</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:40:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504650</guid>
					<description>What would happen to the Clinton campaign if they ran into the insurance co. cutting them off for non-payment and then got penalized thanks to her *healthcare mandates*? Oh, right. Clinton is magic.

PS: can there be a &quot;one diary on Hillary, one diary on McCain&quot; rule?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What would happen to the Clinton campaign if they ran into the insurance co. cutting them off for non-payment and then got penalized thanks to her *healthcare mandates*? Oh, right. Clinton is magic.</p>
	<p>PS: can there be a &#8220;one diary on Hillary, one diary on McCain&#8221; rule?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mnemosyne</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504645</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:29:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504645</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn’t you then have been doing the Republicans’ dirty work for them?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Better to have it come out now while there's still a chance it can be fixed and explained away before the election than to have it come after the nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn’t you then have been doing the Republicans’ dirty work for them?</p></blockquote>
	<p>Better to have it come out now while there&#8217;s still a chance it can be fixed and explained away before the election than to have it come after the nomination.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: clytemnestra</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504635</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:16:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504635</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ignatius
March 31, 2008 at 4:50 pm 

Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn’t you then have been doing the Republicans’ dirty work for them? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL .. so you don’t think they would have already figure this out and added to their box-o-crap on HIllary that they’ve been collecting for 16 years?

If so, you don’t really understand how much the Republicans hate Hillary. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Ignatius<br />
March 31, 2008 at 4:50 pm </p>
	<p>Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn’t you then have been doing the Republicans’ dirty work for them? </p></blockquote>
	<p>LOL .. so you don’t think they would have already figure this out and added to their box-o-crap on HIllary that they’ve been collecting for 16 years?</p>
	<p>If so, you don’t really understand how much the Republicans hate Hillary.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: clytemnestra</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504634</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:15:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504634</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ignatius
March 31, 2008 at 4:50 pm 

Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn’t you then have been doing the Republicans’ dirty work for them? 

LOL .. so you don't think they would have already figure this out and added to their box-o-crap on HIllary that they've been collecting for 16 years?

If so, you don't really understand how much the Republicans hate Hillary.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Ignatius<br />
March 31, 2008 at 4:50 pm </p>
	<p>Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn’t you then have been doing the Republicans’ dirty work for them? </p>
	<p>LOL .. so you don&#8217;t think they would have already figure this out and added to their box-o-crap on HIllary that they&#8217;ve been collecting for 16 years?</p>
	<p>If so, you don&#8217;t really understand how much the Republicans hate Hillary.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: the opoponax</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504622</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:03:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504622</guid>
					<description>Wait, so nobody is allowed to say anything negative about anybody left of George Will lest they eventually become Democratic candidate?

Hillary has a donut's chance in a police precinct of being the Democratic nominee.  The sooner everyone realizes the emperor isn't wearing any clothes, the sooner we can move forward and fight the Republicans.

And even if Hillary were to win, what, do you think we shouldn't be prepared for this?  The more dirty laundry that gets aired now, the less is there for the Republicans to dig up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wait, so nobody is allowed to say anything negative about anybody left of George Will lest they eventually become Democratic candidate?</p>
	<p>Hillary has a donut&#8217;s chance in a police precinct of being the Democratic nominee.  The sooner everyone realizes the emperor isn&#8217;t wearing any clothes, the sooner we can move forward and fight the Republicans.</p>
	<p>And even if Hillary were to win, what, do you think we shouldn&#8217;t be prepared for this?  The more dirty laundry that gets aired now, the less is there for the Republicans to dig up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504615</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:50:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/31/hillary-please-pay-your-small-vendors/#comment-504615</guid>
					<description>Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn't you then have been doing the Republicans' dirty work for them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Should you guys really be talking about this? What about the outside chance that she might get the nomination? Wouldn&#8217;t you then have been doing the Republicans&#8217; dirty work for them?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
