<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panels, man, panels</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: squashed</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504804</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:22:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504804</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;A baby no longer has a host, which means that just about any reasonable person could, potentially, care for it.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;

that argument is the one used against late trimester abortion. that an embryo is mature enough to live in most cases of premature birth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>A baby no longer has a host, which means that just about any reasonable person could, potentially, care for it.&#8221; </i></p>
	<p>that argument is the one used against late trimester abortion. that an embryo is mature enough to live in most cases of premature birth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roy</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504795</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:57:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504795</guid>
					<description>I had the pleasure of attending this session, and was completely blown away by it. I didn't have a chance to thank you or the other presenters, Amanda, but this session was really one of the major highlights for me. I'm &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; thinking about and excitedly talking about what a tremendously informative and thought provoking session it was. 

&lt;b&gt;I really don’t understand how architects let their profession get so fucked up that most of them think it is a good idea to design buildings so that they are disorienting to the people who are supposed to use them. Do they just hate their fellow human beings and want them to suffer, instead of be comfortable?... ...Either way, the design of that building in the picture is fucking disgraceful.&lt;/b&gt;

It may just be a myth, but my understanding was that the building was designed to force a group of people that are traditionally sort of isolationist to interact with each other. The outside of the building is far more chaotic looking than the inside, and, honestly, the inside is thought provoking but comfortable, I thought. It's a visually interesting space and I can see how the slightly curving hallways and such make one more likely to run into and interact with other people. Maybe the story I hear wasn't true, but, either way, I really love the strata center. *shrug*

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ms Kate March 30, 2008 at 7:47 pm
Oh, the status of “zygote-embryo” is PARASITE.
It cannot do much if anything without its host. Therefore, the host makes the call. That simple? Yes.”&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah but baby is pretty helpless too, so that argument will go nowhere quickly.&lt;/b&gt;

Not quite. A baby no longer has a host, which means that just about any reasonable person could, potentially, care for it. I can go down to a hospital tomorrow and feed babies and make sure that they're clean and cared for. I can't do the same for my co-worker's fetus. That's a rather significant difference. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I had the pleasure of attending this session, and was completely blown away by it. I didn&#8217;t have a chance to thank you or the other presenters, Amanda, but this session was really one of the major highlights for me. I&#8217;m <i>still</i> thinking about and excitedly talking about what a tremendously informative and thought provoking session it was. </p>
	<p><b>I really don’t understand how architects let their profession get so fucked up that most of them think it is a good idea to design buildings so that they are disorienting to the people who are supposed to use them. Do they just hate their fellow human beings and want them to suffer, instead of be comfortable?&#8230; &#8230;Either way, the design of that building in the picture is fucking disgraceful.</b></p>
	<p>It may just be a myth, but my understanding was that the building was designed to force a group of people that are traditionally sort of isolationist to interact with each other. The outside of the building is far more chaotic looking than the inside, and, honestly, the inside is thought provoking but comfortable, I thought. It&#8217;s a visually interesting space and I can see how the slightly curving hallways and such make one more likely to run into and interact with other people. Maybe the story I hear wasn&#8217;t true, but, either way, I really love the strata center. *shrug*</p>
	<p><b><i>Ms Kate March 30, 2008 at 7:47 pm<br />
Oh, the status of “zygote-embryo” is PARASITE.<br />
It cannot do much if anything without its host. Therefore, the host makes the call. That simple? Yes.”</i></p>
	<p>Yeah but baby is pretty helpless too, so that argument will go nowhere quickly.</b></p>
	<p>Not quite. A baby no longer has a host, which means that just about any reasonable person could, potentially, care for it. I can go down to a hospital tomorrow and feed babies and make sure that they&#8217;re clean and cared for. I can&#8217;t do the same for my co-worker&#8217;s fetus. That&#8217;s a rather significant difference.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: squashed</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504729</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:40:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504729</guid>
					<description>deep6 March 31, 2008 at 6:06 pm
 Stanek sees the world through an upper-middle class,

she is an idiot. I think it's all about money and exposure in her case. Take out the funding and spotlight, she'll go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>deep6 March 31, 2008 at 6:06 pm<br />
 Stanek sees the world through an upper-middle class,</p>
	<p>she is an idiot. I think it&#8217;s all about money and exposure in her case. Take out the funding and spotlight, she&#8217;ll go away.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: squashed</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504727</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:37:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504727</guid>
					<description>Ms Kate March 30, 2008 at 7:47 pm
Oh, the status of “zygote-embryo” is PARASITE.
It cannot do much if anything without its host. Therefore, the host makes the call. That simple? Yes.&quot;

Yeah but baby is pretty helpless too, so that argument will go nowhere quickly. (I lost an argument using that line of thought once.) But mark my word, the next big fight will actually be 'legal definition&quot; of zygote-embryo, from there status, right and relationship of both pregnant mother and 'zygote-embryo' are codified.

in itself won't be a bad idea, in fact I think this fight is necessary. This is fairly fundamental in term of how we see ourselves, woman's right,  .... etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ms Kate March 30, 2008 at 7:47 pm<br />
Oh, the status of “zygote-embryo” is PARASITE.<br />
It cannot do much if anything without its host. Therefore, the host makes the call. That simple? Yes.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Yeah but baby is pretty helpless too, so that argument will go nowhere quickly. (I lost an argument using that line of thought once.) But mark my word, the next big fight will actually be &#8216;legal definition&#8221; of zygote-embryo, from there status, right and relationship of both pregnant mother and &#8216;zygote-embryo&#8217; are codified.</p>
	<p>in itself won&#8217;t be a bad idea, in fact I think this fight is necessary. This is fairly fundamental in term of how we see ourselves, woman&#8217;s right,  &#8230;. etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deep6</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504663</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:06:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504663</guid>
					<description>Ah, yes.  Stanek sees the world through an upper-middle class, first-world living, emancipated white woman's eyes.  Only someone like that would apply the same behavioral and cultural standards to impoverished women in Tanzania that she applies to herself.  

Shorter Stanek:  &lt;i&gt;I can Just Say No to sex, so all you poor black women in polygamous relationships with no health care and second-class citizenship can too!!!!  Yay! The HIV epidemic is solved!! &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, yes.  Stanek sees the world through an upper-middle class, first-world living, emancipated white woman&#8217;s eyes.  Only someone like that would apply the same behavioral and cultural standards to impoverished women in Tanzania that she applies to herself.  </p>
	<p>Shorter Stanek:  <i>I can Just Say No to sex, so all you poor black women in polygamous relationships with no health care and second-class citizenship can too!!!!  Yay! The HIV epidemic is solved!! </i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Beast</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504637</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:17:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504637</guid>
					<description>Deep 6:
I also think we need to address the pro-safe sex gap. Although there are clearly exceptions, many people in our generation have understood the don’t-have-sex-without-a-condom message. It’s easy to be brought up in a sex-positive household with responsible views on STI-prevention and contraception and then see women who do get pregnant from consensual unprotected sex as irresponsible and not worthy of “the abortion bailout”. This needs to be addressed too. 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, do go over to Stanek's blog and check out today's mighty &quot;Condom Users Die&quot; thread. It's PRICELESS!

http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/03/faithful_condom.html#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Deep 6:<br />
I also think we need to address the pro-safe sex gap. Although there are clearly exceptions, many people in our generation have understood the don’t-have-sex-without-a-condom message. It’s easy to be brought up in a sex-positive household with responsible views on STI-prevention and contraception and then see women who do get pregnant from consensual unprotected sex as irresponsible and not worthy of “the abortion bailout”. This needs to be addressed too.<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Oh, do go over to Stanek&#8217;s blog and check out today&#8217;s mighty &#8220;Condom Users Die&#8221; thread. It&#8217;s PRICELESS!</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/03/faithful_condom.html#comments' rel='nofollow'>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/03/faithful_condom.html#comments</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Beast</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504633</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:10:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504633</guid>
					<description>Oh, she's great.

Check out the thread.  I post as &quot;Fetus Fascist&quot; (yeah, I'm funny) It's old and dead but very revealing.  AFTER she admits swapping out the picture (a picture I found of a real saline abortion) she went on to call me &quot;pig dog slime,&quot; and accuse me of &quot;Satanic retching.&quot;
She's a lovely Christian woman.
Here's the thread: http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/03/new_abortion_ba.html

(By the way, that was just the first time she threw me off of her site.  The last time was yesterday.  She was ranting on and on about Obama's pastor's racist remarks, so I posted John McCain's famous &quot;I hate the gooks&quot; comments from 2000.  She threw me off again...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, she&#8217;s great.</p>
	<p>Check out the thread.  I post as &#8220;Fetus Fascist&#8221; (yeah, I&#8217;m funny) It&#8217;s old and dead but very revealing.  AFTER she admits swapping out the picture (a picture I found of a real saline abortion) she went on to call me &#8220;pig dog slime,&#8221; and accuse me of &#8220;Satanic retching.&#8221;<br />
She&#8217;s a lovely Christian woman.<br />
Here&#8217;s the thread: <a href='http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/03/new_abortion_ba.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/03/new_abortion_ba.html</a></p>
	<p>(By the way, that was just the first time she threw me off of her site.  The last time was yesterday.  She was ranting on and on about Obama&#8217;s pastor&#8217;s racist remarks, so I posted John McCain&#8217;s famous &#8220;I hate the gooks&#8221; comments from 2000.  She threw me off again&#8230;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deep6</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504603</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:51:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504603</guid>
					<description>...but asked if it made any difference HOW the fetus had died.

Which is actually even scarier than the usual Krazee she spews, because it leads to holding women accountable for the outcome of their pregnancies.  A police officer for every womb. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8230;but asked if it made any difference HOW the fetus had died.</p>
	<p>Which is actually even scarier than the usual Krazee she spews, because it leads to holding women accountable for the outcome of their pregnancies.  A police officer for every womb.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deep6</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504600</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:49:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504600</guid>
					<description>Beast - I'm glad you questioned their propaganda.  I don't expect the anti-choicers to actually *accurately* educate the public about abortion, so it's no surprise to me you got kicked off that board.  I think debunking their bullshit is prime in retaking this fight.  People have been duped into associating first trimester abortions with cute little human-like fetuses, and this lie has got to be challenged in public forums throughout mass media and by pro-choice politicians.  Every protest they launch is accompanied by these pictures and gruesome displays of what they want people to think a medically safe abortion actually is.  I think the pro-choice &quot;focus on the woman&quot; meme is strategically wise, but we don't go about it with the fervor the anti-choicers do.  I think we need some pictures.  In color.  The site of a stillborn fetus is nothing compared to a dead woman pooled in her own blood.  People need to remember these images because they are the true story of what happens when we criminalize abortion.  People need to be reminded of what septic infections look like.  The public has been able to forget because federal law has (mostly) been on our side for a generation.

I also think we need to address the pro-safe sex gap.  Although there are clearly exceptions, many people in our generation have understood the don't-have-sex-without-a-condom message.  It's easy to be brought up in a sex-positive household with responsible views on STI-prevention and contraception and then see women who do get pregnant from consensual unprotected sex as irresponsible and not worthy of &quot;the abortion bailout&quot;.  This needs to be addressed too.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Beast - I&#8217;m glad you questioned their propaganda.  I don&#8217;t expect the anti-choicers to actually *accurately* educate the public about abortion, so it&#8217;s no surprise to me you got kicked off that board.  I think debunking their bullshit is prime in retaking this fight.  People have been duped into associating first trimester abortions with cute little human-like fetuses, and this lie has got to be challenged in public forums throughout mass media and by pro-choice politicians.  Every protest they launch is accompanied by these pictures and gruesome displays of what they want people to think a medically safe abortion actually is.  I think the pro-choice &#8220;focus on the woman&#8221; meme is strategically wise, but we don&#8217;t go about it with the fervor the anti-choicers do.  I think we need some pictures.  In color.  The site of a stillborn fetus is nothing compared to a dead woman pooled in her own blood.  People need to remember these images because they are the true story of what happens when we criminalize abortion.  People need to be reminded of what septic infections look like.  The public has been able to forget because federal law has (mostly) been on our side for a generation.</p>
	<p>I also think we need to address the pro-safe sex gap.  Although there are clearly exceptions, many people in our generation have understood the don&#8217;t-have-sex-without-a-condom message.  It&#8217;s easy to be brought up in a sex-positive household with responsible views on STI-prevention and contraception and then see women who do get pregnant from consensual unprotected sex as irresponsible and not worthy of &#8220;the abortion bailout&#8221;.  This needs to be addressed too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ms Kate</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504585</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:13:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/30/6972/#comment-504585</guid>
					<description>Thank you for the debunking, Beast.

The majority of abortions are performed during the embryonic stage of development. No cute aliens involved - blob and a yold sac.  Somehow, that doesn't thrill those who seek to guilt women out of them, so they trot out these near-viable, fully formed intact spontaneous abortions (miscarriages - God's abortions).

The vast majority of late abortions - a very small fraction of the total abortions - occur because something went badly wrong.  Most of those are considered tragically lost children by their parents and happened because the child died in utero, was deformed beyond compatibility with life, or threatened the mother's life.  The idiot brigade wants you to think otherwise because it is so much easier to hate women that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you for the debunking, Beast.</p>
	<p>The majority of abortions are performed during the embryonic stage of development. No cute aliens involved - blob and a yold sac.  Somehow, that doesn&#8217;t thrill those who seek to guilt women out of them, so they trot out these near-viable, fully formed intact spontaneous abortions (miscarriages - God&#8217;s abortions).</p>
	<p>The vast majority of late abortions - a very small fraction of the total abortions - occur because something went badly wrong.  Most of those are considered tragically lost children by their parents and happened because the child died in utero, was deformed beyond compatibility with life, or threatened the mother&#8217;s life.  The idiot brigade wants you to think otherwise because it is so much easier to hate women that way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
