purcywalker@okhouse.gov; weldon.watson@okhouse.gov; paulwesselhoft@okhouse.gov; susanwinchester@okhouse.gov; treborworthen@okhouse.gov; todd.thomsen@okhouse.gov; suetibbs@okhouse.gov; johntrebilcock@okhouse.gov; daleturner@okhouse.gov; bensherrer@okhouse.gov; jerryshoemake@okhouse.gov; jabarshumate@okhouse.gov; glensmithson@okhouse.gov; krissteele@okhouse.gov; paulroan@okhouse.gov; waderousselot@okhouse.gov; earl.sears@okhouse.gov; mikeshelton@okhouse.gov; richardmorrissette@okhouse.gov; jason.murphey@okhouse.gov; billnations@okhouse.gov; ronpeters@okhouse.gov; pampeterson@okhouse.gov; ronpeterson@okhouse.gov; anastasia.pittman@okhouse.gov; eric.proctor@okhouse.gov; rcpruett@okhouse.gov; brian.renegar@okhouse.gov; mikereynolds@okhouse.gov; dennisadkins@okhouse.gov; johnauffet@okhouse.gov; garybanz@okhouse.gov; scott.bighorse@okhouse.gov; davidbraddock@okhouse.gov; neilbrannon@okhouse.gov; mikebrown@okhouse.gov; ed.cannaday@okhouse.gov; johncarey@okhouse.gov; lancecargill@okhouse.gov; wallace.collins@okhouse.gov; jamescovey@okhouse.gov; dougcox@okhouse.gov; david.dank@okhouse.gov; david.derby@okhouse.gov; daledewitt@okhouse.gov; joedorman@okhouse.gov; rexduncan@okhouse.gov; jerryellis@okhouse.gov; john.enns@okhouse.gov; george.faught@okhouse.gov; darrellgilbert@okhouse.gov; larryglenn@okhouse.gov; rebeccahamilton@okhouse.gov; terryharrison@okhouse.gov; weshilliard@okhouse.gov; chuck.hoskin@okhouse.gov; terryhyman@okhouse.gov; scott.inman@okhouse.gov; shanejett@okhouse.gov; dennis.johnson@okhouse.gov; tadjones@okhouse.gov; charlie.joyner@okhouse.gov; kiesel@okhouse.gov; charles.key@okhouse.gov; sallykern@okhouse.gov; luckylamons@okhouse.gov; guyliebmann@okhouse.gov; allindley@okhouse.gov; ken.luttrell@okhouse.gov; al.mcaffrey@okhouse.gov; mccarter@okhouse.gov; mark.mccullough@okhouse.gov; jeanniemcdaniel@okhouse.gov; randy.mcdaniel@okhouse.gov; ryanmcmullen@okhouse.gov; jerrymcpeak@okhouse.gov; kennmiller@okhouse.gov; dannymorgan@okhouse.gov; chrisbenge@okhouse.gov; gusblackwell@okhouse.gov; gregpiatt@okhouse.gov; leedenney@okhouse.gov; terryingmire@okhouse.gov; danielsullivan@okhouse.gov; randyterrill@okhouse.gov; jwhickman@okhouse.gov; johnwright@okhouse.gov; lisajbilly@okhouse.gov; robjohnson@okhouse.gov; mikejackson@okhouse.gov; donarmes@okhouse.gov; mikethompson@okhouse.gov; mariancooksey@okhouse.gov; fred.jordan@okhouse.gov; scott.martin@okhouse.gov; stevemartin@okhouse.gov; skye.mcniel@okhouse.gov; philrichardson@okhouse.gov; colby.schwartz@okhouse.gov; tw.shannon@okhouse.gov; anncoody@okhouse.gov;

If you admit that people have the right to make their own sexual choices, that’s your position, full stop, end of discussion. If you think it’s an “issue” that can be “debated”, then you think that other people’s sex lives are available for public scrutiny, full stop, end of discussion.

In other words, one of those clauses up there is a bald-faced lie.

I took your argument to be that those two clauses contradicted one another, and that consequently one must be a lie. Is that not what you meant?

I didn’t say she was incoherent; I said she was lying. If she were telling the truth, she would believe that people had the right to “destroy our young people and…destroy this nation.”

She’s only saying, “Obviously, you have the right as an American to choose that lifestyle” to pretend that she isn’t anti-gay. To be honest, she should add, “and that’s a terrible, horrible injustice that I intend to change.”

Should one simultaneously disagree with religiously insane pagan occult superstitionists like Sally Kerns and allow others to be exposed to her hateful illogical fairy tales as if they were the laws of the land?

Yes. That’s what it means to be in favor of religious toleration. The other options for this country are civil war and theocracy.

I’d love to hear why you think that the belief that opposition to your religion’s decisions about what is moral and what is not should be given the sanction or force of law is not only incorrect but incoherent, impossible, and dishonest, and in direct opposition to the First Amendment.

I don’t think that.

I have no idea what your point is.

What’s next?
Non-whites?
Jewish poeple?
Muslims?
Overweight poeple?
The bakery around the corner?

Has this “lady” ever heard of separation between Church and State???
She is supposed to keep her religious “beliefs’, to which she is entitled, out of her politics.
One only need to turn to Irak or Afghanistan or Pakistan to see where medling of the two leads too…but then what does she know…..?

What if her child(ren) turn out to be gay….that would be called the ultimate punishment for her ignorance and intolerance.

Enough said.

Realityfighter,

Do you seriously believe that tolerating immoral behavior is an incoherent attitude? That one cannot simultaneously disagree with anti-sodomy laws and disapprove of sodomy?

I’d love to hear why you think the basic premise of Enlightenment political thought is not only incorrect but incoherent, impossible, and dishonest.

March 11, 2008 at 1:20 am

Benquo,

I think that religiously insane idiots like Sally Kerns are engaging in immoral, unethical, and possibly criminal (if done by, say, someone with political power) behavior. Should I tolerate this behavior? If I do, is that an incoherent attitude? Should one simultaneously disagree with religiously insane pagan occult superstitionists like Sally Kerns and allow others to be exposed to her hateful illogical fairy tales as if they were the laws of the land?

I’d love to hear why you think that the belief that opposition to your religion’s decisions about what is moral and what is not should be given the sanction or force of law is not only incorrect but incoherent, impossible, and dishonest, and in direct opposition to the First Amendment.

Please sign the petition to get Sally Kern out of Office. Forward to all your friends, post on your blogs!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/request-to-terminate-sally-kerns-position-house-of-representatives