<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Americans coming around to the diabolical plan</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Em</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495442</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495442</guid>
					<description>Jesus fuckin' Christ.  I've got a stick up my ass?  No, I recognize snotty childfree misogyny when I see it.  Go on, keep proving my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jesus fuckin&#8217; Christ.  I&#8217;ve got a stick up my ass?  No, I recognize snotty childfree misogyny when I see it.  Go on, keep proving my point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: H</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495418</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495418</guid>
					<description>Em, take the stick out your arse, please. &quot;Crotchfruit' is funny precisely because it's so anti the saccharine, humourless view of children that religious loons tend to acquire in regard to the Lawd's Most Pwecious Gift.

I suspect your objections are not really about the supposed religious connotations, though. If they were, you wouldn't object to me calling annoying kids 'snatchdragons' or 'snotminers' which I fully expect you to do within 90 seconds of reading this post. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Em, take the stick out your arse, please. &#8220;Crotchfruit&#8217; is funny precisely because it&#8217;s so anti the saccharine, humourless view of children that religious loons tend to acquire in regard to the Lawd&#8217;s Most Pwecious Gift.</p>
	<p>I suspect your objections are not really about the supposed religious connotations, though. If they were, you wouldn&#8217;t object to me calling annoying kids &#8217;snatchdragons&#8217; or &#8217;snotminers&#8217; which I fully expect you to do within 90 seconds of reading this post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: me</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495377</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495377</guid>
					<description>Em, you are either a purity troll, or a bit funny in the head. Not sure which.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Em, you are either a purity troll, or a bit funny in the head. Not sure which.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Em</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495298</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495298</guid>
					<description>Ah yes.  A biblical reference.  B/c as everyone knows, the Bible is so feminist.  Keep digging, you're almost to China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah yes.  A biblical reference.  B/c as everyone knows, the Bible is so feminist.  Keep digging, you&#8217;re almost to China.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mhorag</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495283</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495283</guid>
					<description>EM:  Oh, one more thing.

Children are the &quot;fruit of our loins.&quot;  Crotches are indeed involved.  Thus, &quot;crotchfruit&quot; is at least accurate.  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>EM:  Oh, one more thing.</p>
	<p>Children are the &#8220;fruit of our loins.&#8221;  Crotches are indeed involved.  Thus, &#8220;crotchfruit&#8221; is at least accurate.  <img src='http://pandagon.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mhorag</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495180</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495180</guid>
					<description>Em:  Wev.

Bruce:  Speaking as an ex-Protestant, I'd say you have the thought processes of a hyothetical Protestant down pretty well. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Em:  Wev.</p>
	<p>Bruce:  Speaking as an ex-Protestant, I&#8217;d say you have the thought processes of a hyothetical Protestant down pretty well. <img src='http://pandagon.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Em</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495176</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-495176</guid>
					<description>Shorter Bruce: I don't know the first thing about it, but it's edgy, so I'll use it for a laugh.  

Explanation noted.  Admonition to 'lighten up' not appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shorter Bruce: I don&#8217;t know the first thing about it, but it&#8217;s edgy, so I&#8217;ll use it for a laugh.  </p>
	<p>Explanation noted.  Admonition to &#8216;lighten up&#8217; not appreciated.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-494953</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-494953</guid>
					<description>Bruce, I could tell you were Catholic because of the &quot;Thanks be to God&quot; ending.  I doubt a Protestant would quote that as the obvious &quot;end of service&quot; signal.

&quot;The Mass is ended. Go in peace to love and serve the Lord.&quot;
&quot;Thank God.  I mean, thanks be to God.&quot;

felagund, I need to get that T-shirt for my boyfriend.  If someone comes up to him and tries to &quot;expose&quot; him to the Bible, he can tell them that we have no fewer than four Bibles at home, that he has read and studied the New Testament extensively, and that if it was going to convert him it would have taken hold by now.

(Four Bibles:  my pink First Communion bible, his Catholic school bible, an NRSV both of us used in the course of majoring in religious studies, and an EXTREME TEEN BIBLE bought solely for the hilarious cover montage of teens engaging in EXTREME sports while holding up the Bible in an EXTREME fashion.)

(We also have the Book of Mormon, which contains the word &quot;mightest.&quot;  My boyfriend's old roommate, currently getting his Ph.D in American religion, corrected it in the margin to &quot;wouldst.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bruce, I could tell you were Catholic because of the &#8220;Thanks be to God&#8221; ending.  I doubt a Protestant would quote that as the obvious &#8220;end of service&#8221; signal.</p>
	<p>&#8220;The Mass is ended. Go in peace to love and serve the Lord.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Thank God.  I mean, thanks be to God.&#8221;</p>
	<p>felagund, I need to get that T-shirt for my boyfriend.  If someone comes up to him and tries to &#8220;expose&#8221; him to the Bible, he can tell them that we have no fewer than four Bibles at home, that he has read and studied the New Testament extensively, and that if it was going to convert him it would have taken hold by now.</p>
	<p>(Four Bibles:  my pink First Communion bible, his Catholic school bible, an NRSV both of us used in the course of majoring in religious studies, and an EXTREME TEEN BIBLE bought solely for the hilarious cover montage of teens engaging in EXTREME sports while holding up the Bible in an EXTREME fashion.)</p>
	<p>(We also have the Book of Mormon, which contains the word &#8220;mightest.&#8221;  My boyfriend&#8217;s old roommate, currently getting his Ph.D in American religion, corrected it in the margin to &#8220;wouldst.&#8221;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-494942</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-494942</guid>
					<description>Gang:

I have two disabled children of my own, folks, and I am home with them now.  Their names are Sam and Noah; they are 5 and 2.  We use sign language to help Sam communicate; he is autistic.  Noah is also autistic but he seems to respond to verbal cues more.  Sam loves to play percussion and has better pitch and rhythm than his Dad.  Noah LOVES to color, all day, and to snuggle with his Planket.

The live blogging was representative of a hypothetical blogger in a hypothetical Protestant church.  I am an atheist and have no background in the Protestant churches.  

Sometimes writers assume a persona that is not their own.  In the U.S., this is lawful for comedic and dramatic effect.  In most churches (not all), ushers are male and so I also probably would not find the usher &quot;hot&quot; (given my orientation, etc.)  But I probably would not be in a Protestant church with a &quot;pastor&quot; either because the &quot;church I don't believe in anymore&quot; usually calls them &quot;priests.&quot;  Not the clue: &quot;if THEY live-blogged churchES,&quot; not &quot;if I live-blogged the last Catholic church I set foot in....&quot;

Everybody, please, Metamucil, for the love of Pete.  I have to go now because I have faces to kiss and asses to wipe, or the other way around, I forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gang:</p>
	<p>I have two disabled children of my own, folks, and I am home with them now.  Their names are Sam and Noah; they are 5 and 2.  We use sign language to help Sam communicate; he is autistic.  Noah is also autistic but he seems to respond to verbal cues more.  Sam loves to play percussion and has better pitch and rhythm than his Dad.  Noah LOVES to color, all day, and to snuggle with his Planket.</p>
	<p>The live blogging was representative of a hypothetical blogger in a hypothetical Protestant church.  I am an atheist and have no background in the Protestant churches.  </p>
	<p>Sometimes writers assume a persona that is not their own.  In the U.S., this is lawful for comedic and dramatic effect.  In most churches (not all), ushers are male and so I also probably would not find the usher &#8220;hot&#8221; (given my orientation, etc.)  But I probably would not be in a Protestant church with a &#8220;pastor&#8221; either because the &#8220;church I don&#8217;t believe in anymore&#8221; usually calls them &#8220;priests.&#8221;  Not the clue: &#8220;if THEY live-blogged churchES,&#8221; not &#8220;if I live-blogged the last Catholic church I set foot in&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Everybody, please, Metamucil, for the love of Pete.  I have to go now because I have faces to kiss and asses to wipe, or the other way around, I forget.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Em</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-494883</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/26/6798/#comment-494883</guid>
					<description>Mhorag, I don't give a fuck how annoying a screaming three year can be.  Women are not trees.  Children are not fruit that fall out of them.  Unless you are a forced-birther and then that is exactly what they are.  If you or Bruce want to snicker at 'breeders', you can do it somewhere else besides a thread on, of all things, secularization in the US.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mhorag, I don&#8217;t give a fuck how annoying a screaming three year can be.  Women are not trees.  Children are not fruit that fall out of them.  Unless you are a forced-birther and then that is exactly what they are.  If you or Bruce want to snicker at &#8216;breeders&#8217;, you can do it somewhere else besides a thread on, of all things, secularization in the US.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
