Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s chief strategist, would obviously benefit from a Clinton win. One thing he doesn’t have is any vested interest in supporting Obama as the Democratic nominee against John McCain. Take a look at this:

Hillary Clinton’s chief strategist is Mark Penn, and Charlie Black, John McCain’s top adviser, is chairman of BKSH, the DC-based lobbying subsidiary of Burson-Marsteller — of which Mark Penn is CEO.

Yes, this is the same lobbyist Barack Obama was referring to when he criticized John McCain for allowing lobbyists to conduct their business on board his bus.

BKSH is a bipartisan lobbying firm. Black, the chairman is the top Republican. The top Democrat is R. Scott Pastrick, who like Penn, supports Hillary Clinton.

Mark Penn’s personal interests would clearly be best served by a Hillary Clinton victory.

A McCain presidency wouldn’t be a bad consolation prize, however. It would be far better to have the head of his lobbying be tight with the president than to have a president like Obama who sought to impose new restrictions on his lobbyist operation.

Joe at Americablog has even more on Penn: Mark Penn’s tangled corporate web.
Penn has an obligation to his shareholders and clients. And his firm seems to have clients on both sides of the aisle, on both sides of this fight. If Obama wins the presidency, Penn gets nothing. He was helping the other guy, or gal. But if McCain wins, Penn’s firm has one hell of a contact with the new president - heck, one of his top employees had the new president as a client and didn’t even charge him! Is it a conflict of interest? Not with his clients. But how about with the Democratic party and our interests?
And the atmosphere on the inside continues to deteriorate as more staffers are leaking to the press about conflicts. More below the fold.

(NYT):
Morale is low. After 13 months of dawn-to-dark seven-day weeks, the staff is exhausted. Some have taken to going home early — 9 p.m. — turning off their BlackBerrys, and polishing off bottles of wine, several senior staff members said.

Some advisers have been heard yelling at close friends and colleagues. In a much-reported incident, Mr. Penn and the campaign advertising chief, Mandy Grunwald, had a screaming match over strategy recently that prompted another senior aide, Guy Cecil, to leave the room. “I have work to do — you’re acting like kids,” Mr. Cecil said, according to three people in the room.

…In interviews with 15 aides and advisers to Mrs. Clinton, not a single one expressed any regrets that they were not working for Mr. Obama. Indeed, some aides said they were baffled that a candidate who had been in the United States Senate for only three years and was a state lawmaker in Illinois before that was now outpacing a seasoned figure like Mrs. Clinton. And to a person, these aides and advisers praised Mrs. Clinton and said that she had been a better candidate than her campaign strategy and operation reflected.

What would be tragic is if she were to continue to follow bad advice from her high-paid shills, consultants and hangers-on like Penn, a hired gun who is protecting his interests, not hers. Apparently he doesn’t think she can win on her experience and would rather risk, win or lose having Clinton look petty and fear-driven, filled with negativity and bitter sarcasm - oh, like Karl Rove’s GOP. If Obama’s the nom, he will face this sort of BS, but is this how Hillary wants to go out? It looks more like consultants flailing about trying to do CYA instead of making their candidate look good. Hillary needs to sh*tcan Penn and the rest of these losers.

Especially if the Clinton campaign is confirmed as being responsible for this. The Politico noted that the Clinton campaign did not deny the charge of circulating the photo, but did not comment further. One would think that the first thing Clinton or a surrogate would do is address a charge of someone in the campaign sending around a Muslim-baiting photo of Obama. (He’s pictured in a turban and native Kenyan clothing for a ceremonial event during a 5-day tour in Africa.) It’s egregious particularly since her campaign surrogates in Iowa were caught spamming the “Obama is a Muslim” email to people. I’d want my hands clean of this ASAP.

This is the non-denial response sent out by campaign manager Maggie Williams.

Statement by Maggie Williams, Campaign Manager

“Enough.

“If Barack Obama’s campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

“This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry.

“We will not be distracted.”

Ahem. If this represents a real response, this is a sad time indeed, given the campaign has already engaged in Muslim-baiting. Sigh.

Also: dnA doesn’t hold back on his opinion. Whew.


10 Responses to “Million-dollar Mark Penn’s real campaign allegiances - and that Obama photo”  

  1. Howard Wolfson has issued a complete denial that the Clinton campaign–at least at the top levels–had anything to do with the photo.


  2. He left a tractor-trailer-sized hole in that statement that is typical when you want plausible deniability.

    Asked if the campaign had any role, Wolfson said, “No, not to my knowledge…I’ve never seen that picture before. I’m not aware that anyone else here has. I’m not aware that anyone here has circulated this e-mail.”


  3. It sounds to me like he’s saying “nobody at the top did this, but it could have been a low-level person we haven’t found yet,” which would be similar to the situation early in the campaign where the low-level staff person was sending around the “Obama is a secret Muslim” email, and was canned for it soon afterward.

    When I saw the story, though, my first thought was “that’s the kind of shit Mark Penn would do.”


  4. I’m inclined to wonder about the provenance of this photo, considering that Drudge was on it. Wolfson’s statement isn’t a categorical denial, but it does leave open the possibility that someone lower in the chain slipped this to Drudge without authorization.


  5. stormkite

    It’s also very possible, even MORE likely, that Drudge’s source is a rightwing Rovian.

    And at this point I’ve seen enough shit from Barackites that I wouldn’t be at all surprised if someone in that group slipped it in. If you want an old picture of Barack…

    Remember LBJ’s pigfucker strategy?

    At this point I don’t fucking CARE who wins. I just want my “legal resident” papers from the other country.


  6. Even if this was done without authorization, this is the kind of climate created when senior staff are shopping $200 donations from superannuated radicals.
    You know I keep wanting to give HRC the benefit of the doubt because I have generally liked her and I see others wanting to do the same, but…she chose these people (Penn,Ickes, Wolfson) and she’s kept them. I found myself thinking”Poor Hillary, these guys are destroying you” the other day and then it was a truly WTF moment. Ultimately she is making these decisions and is responsible for them.


  7. Lloyd Webber

    Zuzu, this is exactly the kind of shit that HRC and her abortion of a campaign would pull. Desperate time call for desperate measures (no matter how rovian)


  8. Great. So Burson-Marsteller is basically the WWI arms merchants.


  9. Blue Jean

    So Drudge is a Hillary Democrat now? Coulda fooled me.



Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.

Live Preview: