Back when the Taliban first took over, feminists were railing against the atrocities committed against women. I remember signing petitions and writing my representatives.

But, no, we couldn’t do anything about the Taliban then, not even for humanitarian reasons. They just kicked women out of their jobs and schools. It wasn’t like they were torturing them or killing them outright.

For the most part men and the international community didn’t really care what the Taliban did till they blew up the giant Buddha statues. While that was also a crime, statues aren’t people, women are.

Feminists, regardless of how progressive/liberal, have never respected a culture that treats women as trash. That is precisely the type of culture that feminism opposes–you know, a misogynist one?

People care. They just don’t see how being racist helps the feminist movement. B/c, as is stated above, if you give women rights and control over their reproductive organs, the number of children they have goes down. That’s the feminist answer to “overbreeding” by the brown folk.

a cultural adaptation brought about by military necessity: namely, a small, nomadic tribe finds itself in hostile territory, and wants to lay claim to some of that territory, and must therefore create new, little Hebrews as quickly as possible …

Not exactly relevant, but there ya go …

—–

In that case they should have invented titty bar and pornography instead.

And then Japanese politicians yowl about their lack of birth rate. Hee. It’s the purest example I’ve seen of (rational decision making) + (economic and financial disincentives) coming back to bite them in the ass. Squawking about tradition in order to keep a section of the populace making sacrifices only gets you so far.

NO. There. Aren’t.

Okay.

Just for the record, I don’t mean legislation, like legally establishing Sharia. I mean is it done in practice, illegally.

Actually something that’s still very unclear to me is exactly how much traction all this has within Europe itself.

Well, that’s an interesting one. It’s one of those subjects where if you do a survey, a lot of people will say they are concerned about immigration in general, but the number of people who think it’s a problem in their area is surprisingly small.

It’s a bit like school standards in that respect - everyone’s convinced that all the other schools are going to the dogs, but theirs is fine.

Now, in the UK there certainly are some problems with public service provision in certain areas - but personally I feel that’s more as a result of (a) decades of underinvestment, and (b) a deliberate policy of ghettoization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_Honor_of_the_German_Mother

Aren’t there Muslim neighborhoods in the Netherlands and France that’ve started practicing Sharia law? If so, Muslim immigration into Europe is a genuine problem. Period.

NO. There.Aren’t. Unless you’re thinking about the UK and its Canterbury Archbishop, who’s in favor of introducing some aspects of the Sharia in the british laws .

…obviously the solution is, white men need to start having their share in being pregnant with white babies! Fetuses have grew outside the uterus before, so the possibility is there. Of course, many men will died of childbirth, but they will sacrifice their lives for the noble cause of white babies! Let’s head into surgery and get those white men pregnant now! There are millions of left-over fetuses waiting for a host!