<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why some discussions are best left private</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: pablo</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492805</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492805</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think people want to believe it’s fake b/c they’ve been taught women are desperate for the ring, and if a guy would offer it, why would any woman reject it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No we think it's fake because:  the announcers telegraphed it. The mascot was ready to comfort him with a beer. it took place on the court and not up in the stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>I think people want to believe it’s fake b/c they’ve been taught women are desperate for the ring, and if a guy would offer it, why would any woman reject it?</p></blockquote>
	<p>No we think it&#8217;s fake because:  the announcers telegraphed it. The mascot was ready to comfort him with a beer. it took place on the court and not up in the stands.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mickle</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492714</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492714</guid>
					<description>Chet, that isn't really what you suggested happened at first...

&lt;blockquote&gt;If you’re just going to talk it over like reasonable people, why do you need a ring? If you’re going to play it by the book, it’s supposed to be a surprise.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thinking that you surprised her with the ring isn't binary thinking, it's what you initially said you did.  You were pretty explicit about not &quot;talk[ing] it over&quot; and actualling &quot;surpris[ing]&quot; her.  And yet, obviously, you did &quot;talk it over like reasonable people.&quot;  As far as I can tell, the only difference between what you did and what you were initially complaining about is that she just wasn't physically there with you when you bought the actual ring.

Try being clearer next time and drawing fewer thin lines between things that are in the end pretty much the same, and people will be less likely to think you did something you didn't do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet, that isn&#8217;t really what you suggested happened at first&#8230;</p>
	<blockquote><p>If you’re just going to talk it over like reasonable people, why do you need a ring? If you’re going to play it by the book, it’s supposed to be a surprise.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Thinking that you surprised her with the ring isn&#8217;t binary thinking, it&#8217;s what you initially said you did.  You were pretty explicit about not &#8220;talk[ing] it over&#8221; and actualling &#8220;surpris[ing]&#8221; her.  And yet, obviously, you did &#8220;talk it over like reasonable people.&#8221;  As far as I can tell, the only difference between what you did and what you were initially complaining about is that she just wasn&#8217;t physically there with you when you bought the actual ring.</p>
	<p>Try being clearer next time and drawing fewer thin lines between things that are in the end pretty much the same, and people will be less likely to think you did something you didn&#8217;t do.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492652</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492652</guid>
					<description>Chet, I also assume that you dispensed with the bridal registry since it would be inappropriate for you and your wife to pick what gifts your guests would give you. 

(I should note that I am quite pure in all respects since I didn't have an engagement ring or a bridal registry.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet, I also assume that you dispensed with the bridal registry since it would be inappropriate for you and your wife to pick what gifts your guests would give you. </p>
	<p>(I should note that I am quite pure in all respects since I didn&#8217;t have an engagement ring or a bridal registry.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492651</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492651</guid>
					<description>Chet, it is still binary thinking because you are saying that couples should either perform the engagement ring ritual in a certain way or dispense with the whole thing altogether.  

&lt;i&gt;And if your partner literally can’t be relied upon to buy one piece of jewelry for you without you hovering over his/her shoulder, is marriage really in the cards for you at that point?&lt;/i&gt;

Except that it's not just one piece of jewelry.  It's something that the woman is expected to wear every day for the rest of her life -- to the point that many women can't even get the damn thing physically off their bodies.  So picking out this item is an extrremely personal decision.  To each their own, and I am happy for you and your wife, but I couldn't imagine my husband picking something out that I would have to wear every day.  And we know each other pretty well, having lived together for 13 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet, it is still binary thinking because you are saying that couples should either perform the engagement ring ritual in a certain way or dispense with the whole thing altogether.  </p>
	<p><i>And if your partner literally can’t be relied upon to buy one piece of jewelry for you without you hovering over his/her shoulder, is marriage really in the cards for you at that point?</i></p>
	<p>Except that it&#8217;s not just one piece of jewelry.  It&#8217;s something that the woman is expected to wear every day for the rest of her life &#8212; to the point that many women can&#8217;t even get the damn thing physically off their bodies.  So picking out this item is an extrremely personal decision.  To each their own, and I am happy for you and your wife, but I couldn&#8217;t imagine my husband picking something out that I would have to wear every day.  And we know each other pretty well, having lived together for 13 years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Persimmon</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492634</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492634</guid>
					<description>And if your partner literally can’t be relied upon to buy one piece of jewelry for you without you hovering over his/her shoulder, is marriage really in the cards for you at that point? Shouldn’t the other know you a little better than that?

That seems a little shallow. My husband gets my taste generally right more often than not, but misses a significant amount of the time and is perfectly fine with my returning said misses for things I pick out myself. Taste does not equal worldview; an inability to predict my taste in fripperies doesn't make him any less intelligent, kind, funny, and flexible, and those are the qualities I married him for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And if your partner literally can’t be relied upon to buy one piece of jewelry for you without you hovering over his/her shoulder, is marriage really in the cards for you at that point? Shouldn’t the other know you a little better than that?</p>
	<p>That seems a little shallow. My husband gets my taste generally right more often than not, but misses a significant amount of the time and is perfectly fine with my returning said misses for things I pick out myself. Taste does not equal worldview; an inability to predict my taste in fripperies doesn&#8217;t make him any less intelligent, kind, funny, and flexible, and those are the qualities I married him for.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chet</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492630</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492630</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Is it really a we/our thing if half the couple is left out of the loop?&lt;/i&gt;

In what sense do you think my wife was left out of the loop? It's not like I surprised her with the whole thing - we talked about marriage, we'd occasionally talked about engagement rings that she would &quot;hypothetically&quot; like, she estimated her ring size, and when I finally popped the question - in an extremely obvious place for a proposal - she basically said &quot;duh, of course.&quot; And she thought the ring was great. She literally had every available input into the process short of pointing at one and saying &quot;buy that.&quot;

Now who, exactly, is exhibiting binary thinking? There's a space between &quot;I picked a ring with absolutely no input from you or consideration for your tastes&quot; and &quot;yes, I'll marry you; now let's go pick out the ring you're going to buy me.&quot;

Picking out your own ring is like getting cash for Christmas. Sure, it meets the bare minimum the situation requires; but something is definitely lost. An interpersonal connection. A chance to prove that you really can get a sense of another person's perspective. And if your partner literally can't be relied upon to buy &lt;i&gt;one piece of jewelry&lt;/i&gt; for you without you hovering over his/her shoulder, is marriage really in the cards for you at that point? Shouldn't the other know you a little better than that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Is it really a we/our thing if half the couple is left out of the loop?</i></p>
	<p>In what sense do you think my wife was left out of the loop? It&#8217;s not like I surprised her with the whole thing - we talked about marriage, we&#8217;d occasionally talked about engagement rings that she would &#8220;hypothetically&#8221; like, she estimated her ring size, and when I finally popped the question - in an extremely obvious place for a proposal - she basically said &#8220;duh, of course.&#8221; And she thought the ring was great. She literally had every available input into the process short of pointing at one and saying &#8220;buy that.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Now who, exactly, is exhibiting binary thinking? There&#8217;s a space between &#8220;I picked a ring with absolutely no input from you or consideration for your tastes&#8221; and &#8220;yes, I&#8217;ll marry you; now let&#8217;s go pick out the ring you&#8217;re going to buy me.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Picking out your own ring is like getting cash for Christmas. Sure, it meets the bare minimum the situation requires; but something is definitely lost. An interpersonal connection. A chance to prove that you really can get a sense of another person&#8217;s perspective. And if your partner literally can&#8217;t be relied upon to buy <i>one piece of jewelry</i> for you without you hovering over his/her shoulder, is marriage really in the cards for you at that point? Shouldn&#8217;t the other know you a little better than that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mickle</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492553</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492553</guid>
					<description>Might Ponygirl

Ha!  My sister has a similar story.  It's wasn't &lt;i&gt;quite&lt;/i&gt; as intimate a moment as the one I think you are hinting at, but it happened by accident, when they were in bed together.  He'd been planning on asking her; in fact already had the date and time all set up.  Then they were (not quite) arguing one night because of something he said that made sis feel like maybe he wasn't all that into her after all, and he just sort of blurted out that he wanted to get married, and don't you?

She swore us bridesmaids to secrecy (ha!) bc he would be embarrassed, but I thought it was really sweet and a lot more genuine than a big production.  I think he &quot;officially&quot; asked her on the date he had already planned for, and that's the story she probably tells everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Might Ponygirl</p>
	<p>Ha!  My sister has a similar story.  It&#8217;s wasn&#8217;t <i>quite</i> as intimate a moment as the one I think you are hinting at, but it happened by accident, when they were in bed together.  He&#8217;d been planning on asking her; in fact already had the date and time all set up.  Then they were (not quite) arguing one night because of something he said that made sis feel like maybe he wasn&#8217;t all that into her after all, and he just sort of blurted out that he wanted to get married, and don&#8217;t you?</p>
	<p>She swore us bridesmaids to secrecy (ha!) bc he would be embarrassed, but I thought it was really sweet and a lot more genuine than a big production.  I think he &#8220;officially&#8221; asked her on the date he had already planned for, and that&#8217;s the story she probably tells everyone else.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: preying mantis</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492535</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492535</guid>
					<description>&quot;On the other hand, when we get engaged in the way that suits our beliefs, please have the courtesy not to refer to those beliefs as, and I quote, “patronizing and presumptuous”.&quot;

Is it really a we/our thing if half the couple is left out of the loop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;On the other hand, when we get engaged in the way that suits our beliefs, please have the courtesy not to refer to those beliefs as, and I quote, “patronizing and presumptuous”.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Is it really a we/our thing if half the couple is left out of the loop?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492523</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492523</guid>
					<description>Chet, I don't think the idea of surprising the woman with a ring the man picked out is especially traditional.  As Miss Manners explains:

&lt;i&gt;The surprise ring dates 

from when the gentleman was likely to produce a family ring, and it fell into abeyance when gentlemen without family jewelry were nevertheless deemed eligible. Sensibly, then the proposal came first; sometime subsequently, the lady was taken to choose from a variety of rings that the gentleman had put aside as meeting his budget.

Now that producing a ring is considered central to the drama of a proposal, it has become a package deal.&lt;/i&gt;

When my father proposed, he gave my mother a family ring but offered to have the stone re-set if she didn't like the style. I think Miss Manners has hit it on the head -- the idea of buying a surprise ring is a new-fangled idea,  part of the scripted, showman-like aspect of romance and weddings in America today.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chet, I don&#8217;t think the idea of surprising the woman with a ring the man picked out is especially traditional.  As Miss Manners explains:</p>
	<p><i>The surprise ring dates </p>
	<p>from when the gentleman was likely to produce a family ring, and it fell into abeyance when gentlemen without family jewelry were nevertheless deemed eligible. Sensibly, then the proposal came first; sometime subsequently, the lady was taken to choose from a variety of rings that the gentleman had put aside as meeting his budget.</p>
	<p>Now that producing a ring is considered central to the drama of a proposal, it has become a package deal.</i></p>
	<p>When my father proposed, he gave my mother a family ring but offered to have the stone re-set if she didn&#8217;t like the style. I think Miss Manners has hit it on the head &#8212; the idea of buying a surprise ring is a new-fangled idea,  part of the scripted, showman-like aspect of romance and weddings in America today.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jenniferjuniper</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492513</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/18/6753/#comment-492513</guid>
					<description>&quot;I’m really confused as to why anyone would think that proposing in a sports arena would be a good idea.&quot;

I know a couple who really loved the Chicago Blackhawks (and hockey in general).  He did propose to her with one of those billboards that said &quot;Will you marry me, [woman's name]?&quot;  However, they had discussed it and it absolutely was a yes,  So for them, it wasn't pressure at all.   But I can definitely see how in this dynamic, the guy appeared to be hoping that the pressure of the crowd would entice her to say yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;I’m really confused as to why anyone would think that proposing in a sports arena would be a good idea.&#8221;</p>
	<p>I know a couple who really loved the Chicago Blackhawks (and hockey in general).  He did propose to her with one of those billboards that said &#8220;Will you marry me, [woman&#8217;s name]?&#8221;  However, they had discussed it and it absolutely was a yes,  So for them, it wasn&#8217;t pressure at all.   But I can definitely see how in this dynamic, the guy appeared to be hoping that the pressure of the crowd would entice her to say yes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
