<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Guide to Nice Guys&reg; in Comic Form</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: idontgetit</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493804</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493804</guid>
					<description>damn I forgot to write a footnot to the asterisk too.
shallowness and superficiality*? 

* Men are shallow and superficial too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>damn I forgot to write a footnot to the asterisk too.<br />
shallowness and superficiality*? </p>
	<p>* Men are shallow and superficial too
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: idontgetit</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493803</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493803</guid>
					<description>really really sorry about the double post. Didnt realize it accepted first one. Moderator, please delete one. I did not intend to post both on purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>really really sorry about the double post. Didnt realize it accepted first one. Moderator, please delete one. I did not intend to post both on purpose.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lb</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493757</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493757</guid>
					<description>&quot;however, pining away for one unavailable and unattainable woman while you ignore very real, interesting women whose only flaw is that they aren’t her is actually symptomatic of Nice Guy(R)-ism&quot;

&quot;The thing about Nice Guys(tm) is they only count gorgeous women when they think about “women” as a whole. They don’t even realize that shy, maybe dorky women who don’t look like models even exist.&quot;



I love how in these converations ripping on the &quot;nice guys&quot;...&quot;TM&quot;, they always mention all these nice but supposedly less-than-hot women who are pining over the alleged whiners but who those guys supposedly wont bother with because they are only pining over the perfect &quot;10&quot;. 


I think I know where these women are. They're at the same place where theyre giving out all those wonderful jobs that the panhandlers and welfare recepients would take, if  they were not so damn lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;however, pining away for one unavailable and unattainable woman while you ignore very real, interesting women whose only flaw is that they aren’t her is actually symptomatic of Nice Guy(R)-ism&#8221;</p>
	<p>&#8220;The thing about Nice Guys(tm) is they only count gorgeous women when they think about “women” as a whole. They don’t even realize that shy, maybe dorky women who don’t look like models even exist.&#8221;</p>
	<p>I love how in these converations ripping on the &#8220;nice guys&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;TM&#8221;, they always mention all these nice but supposedly less-than-hot women who are pining over the alleged whiners but who those guys supposedly wont bother with because they are only pining over the perfect &#8220;10&#8243;. </p>
	<p>I think I know where these women are. They&#8217;re at the same place where theyre giving out all those wonderful jobs that the panhandlers and welfare recepients would take, if  they were not so damn lazy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Idontgetit</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493734</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493734</guid>
					<description>I always suspected this about most women but now I finally have proof, thanks to ponygirl.
So ponygirl, your gonna judge a truly nice man from a fake nice man by whether or not he has a girl on his arm?
This is a big problem I have with, well I wont say all women, but a certain number of women judging by what I read on boards such as this...
You see the more I read certain women-friendly/feminist blogs and commentary, I can't help but notice that there seems to be certain unspoken belief, though its been implied. And I think this beleif, this myth, is a major factor  of all this labeling &quot;Nice Guy (TM)&quot; nonsense.

The myth I see implied is:

&quot;If a man is unable to get a woman to enter a sexual/romatic relationship with him, then he somehow doesnt deserve it. The reason MUST be to due a moral failure/character flaw on part of the man. Either he's an asshole, thinks hes entitled, a whiner, or refuses/fails to truly understand or relate to women as human beings. Or perhaps he has ridiculous standards and only wants to date women with model looks. Or he's just not trying hard enough. Or some variations of these moral failings. Either way, he is unworthy not only of sex, but of sympathy as well&quot;

Of course this results in a lot of &quot;losers&quot; having salt rubbed in their wounds, the biggest sufferers being the shy, meek, &quot;sweet&quot; guy who aside from having to be denied the sweet fruit of eros, must also then be horrendously demonized should he dare lament his fate.

Are women that blind to realize and own up to their own shallowness and superficiality*? 

Can't the &quot;nice guy who can't get laid&quot; be JUST THAT?!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I always suspected this about most women but now I finally have proof, thanks to ponygirl.<br />
So ponygirl, your gonna judge a truly nice man from a fake nice man by whether or not he has a girl on his arm?<br />
This is a big problem I have with, well I wont say all women, but a certain number of women judging by what I read on boards such as this&#8230;<br />
You see the more I read certain women-friendly/feminist blogs and commentary, I can&#8217;t help but notice that there seems to be certain unspoken belief, though its been implied. And I think this beleif, this myth, is a major factor  of all this labeling &#8220;Nice Guy &#8482;&#8221; nonsense.</p>
	<p>The myth I see implied is:</p>
	<p>&#8220;If a man is unable to get a woman to enter a sexual/romatic relationship with him, then he somehow doesnt deserve it. The reason MUST be to due a moral failure/character flaw on part of the man. Either he&#8217;s an asshole, thinks hes entitled, a whiner, or refuses/fails to truly understand or relate to women as human beings. Or perhaps he has ridiculous standards and only wants to date women with model looks. Or he&#8217;s just not trying hard enough. Or some variations of these moral failings. Either way, he is unworthy not only of sex, but of sympathy as well&#8221;</p>
	<p>Of course this results in a lot of &#8220;losers&#8221; having salt rubbed in their wounds, the biggest sufferers being the shy, meek, &#8220;sweet&#8221; guy who aside from having to be denied the sweet fruit of eros, must also then be horrendously demonized should he dare lament his fate.</p>
	<p>Are women that blind to realize and own up to their own shallowness and superficiality*? </p>
	<p>Can&#8217;t the &#8220;nice guy who can&#8217;t get laid&#8221; be JUST THAT?!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Idontgetit</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493730</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-493730</guid>
					<description>I always suspected this about most women but now I finally have proof, thanks to ponygirl.
So ponygirl, your gonna judge a truly nice man from a fake nice man by whether or not he has a girl on his arm?
This is a big problem I have with, well I wont say all women, but a certain number of women judging by what I read on boards such as this...
You see the more I read certain women-friendly/feminist blogs and commentary, I can't help but notice that there seems to be certain unspoken belief, though its been implied. And I think this beleif, this myth, is a major factor  of all this labeling &quot;Nice Guy (TM)&quot; nonsense.

The myth I see implied is:

&quot;If a man is unable to get a woman to enter a sexual/romatic relationship with him, then he somehow doesnt deserve it. The reason MUST be to due a moral failure/character flaw on part of the man. Either he's an asshole, thinks hes entitled, a whiner, or refuses/fails to truly understand or relate to women as human beings. Or perhaps he has ridiculous standards and only wants to date women with model looks. Or he's just not trying hard enough. Or some variations of these moral failings. Either way, he is unworthy not only of sex, but of sympathy as well&quot;

Of course this results in a lot of &quot;losers&quot; having salt rubbed in their wounds, the biggest sufferers being the shy, meek, &quot;sweet&quot; guy who aside from having to be denied the sweet fruit of eros, must also then be horrendously demonized should he dare lament his fate.

Are women that blind to realize and own up to their own shallowness and superficiality*? 

Can't the &quot;nice guy who can't get laid&quot; be JUST THAT?!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I always suspected this about most women but now I finally have proof, thanks to ponygirl.<br />
So ponygirl, your gonna judge a truly nice man from a fake nice man by whether or not he has a girl on his arm?<br />
This is a big problem I have with, well I wont say all women, but a certain number of women judging by what I read on boards such as this&#8230;<br />
You see the more I read certain women-friendly/feminist blogs and commentary, I can&#8217;t help but notice that there seems to be certain unspoken belief, though its been implied. And I think this beleif, this myth, is a major factor  of all this labeling &#8220;Nice Guy &#8482;&#8221; nonsense.</p>
	<p>The myth I see implied is:</p>
	<p>&#8220;If a man is unable to get a woman to enter a sexual/romatic relationship with him, then he somehow doesnt deserve it. The reason MUST be to due a moral failure/character flaw on part of the man. Either he&#8217;s an asshole, thinks hes entitled, a whiner, or refuses/fails to truly understand or relate to women as human beings. Or perhaps he has ridiculous standards and only wants to date women with model looks. Or he&#8217;s just not trying hard enough. Or some variations of these moral failings. Either way, he is unworthy not only of sex, but of sympathy as well&#8221;</p>
	<p>Of course this results in a lot of &#8220;losers&#8221; having salt rubbed in their wounds, the biggest sufferers being the shy, meek, &#8220;sweet&#8221; guy who aside from having to be denied the sweet fruit of eros, must also then be horrendously demonized should he dare lament his fate.</p>
	<p>Are women that blind to realize and own up to their own shallowness and superficiality*? </p>
	<p>Can&#8217;t the &#8220;nice guy who can&#8217;t get laid&#8221; be JUST THAT?!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-491540</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-491540</guid>
					<description>Nice Guy(r) is a reasonable term and insult, of course, though it muddies the waters for decent chaps looking to mature into the point where they can form sane relationships.

Nice Guy(r) is also a hate term, and should go in the box labelled 'use with care'.

Still, a naive jerk typing in 'Nice Guy' into Google after their first rejection might learn a thing, and may grow into a decent chap. We can only hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice Guy(r) is a reasonable term and insult, of course, though it muddies the waters for decent chaps looking to mature into the point where they can form sane relationships.</p>
	<p>Nice Guy(r) is also a hate term, and should go in the box labelled &#8216;use with care&#8217;.</p>
	<p>Still, a naive jerk typing in &#8216;Nice Guy&#8217; into Google after their first rejection might learn a thing, and may grow into a decent chap. We can only hope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490488</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490488</guid>
					<description>Mighty Ponygirl,

It looks like the thread is starting to come to a close, so we'll have to agree to disagree on some of the specifics. 

But I think we agree on quite a bit actually. I think what you're saying (correct me if I'm wrong) is that being a good person (as opposed to a NiceGuy) is a positive attribute, and one that potential mates generally consider attractive. I agree with you 100% on that. Also, you're definitely right when you emphasize that women in relationships with Niceguys find it very miserable (and of course viceaversa with guys and Nicegirls, and also with gay and lesbian couples). So, on a general level, yes, these things are extremely influential in making or breaking a relationship.

My point all along has been, that you can't make assumptions about every person who is single. Being a good person is always a positive attribute, and yet, people are complex, circumstances are complex (as you admitted with that whole external/internal thing), so to say being truly nice is a guaranteed way to get dates is not accurate. Does it help? Yes, absolutely. It is not, however, a guarantee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mighty Ponygirl,</p>
	<p>It looks like the thread is starting to come to a close, so we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree on some of the specifics. </p>
	<p>But I think we agree on quite a bit actually. I think what you&#8217;re saying (correct me if I&#8217;m wrong) is that being a good person (as opposed to a NiceGuy) is a positive attribute, and one that potential mates generally consider attractive. I agree with you 100% on that. Also, you&#8217;re definitely right when you emphasize that women in relationships with Niceguys find it very miserable (and of course viceaversa with guys and Nicegirls, and also with gay and lesbian couples). So, on a general level, yes, these things are extremely influential in making or breaking a relationship.</p>
	<p>My point all along has been, that you can&#8217;t make assumptions about every person who is single. Being a good person is always a positive attribute, and yet, people are complex, circumstances are complex (as you admitted with that whole external/internal thing), so to say being truly nice is a guaranteed way to get dates is not accurate. Does it help? Yes, absolutely. It is not, however, a guarantee.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hector B.</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490130</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490130</guid>
					<description>I liked and appreciated everything I read on Destructor's link, except for this: &lt;i&gt;This is because a Nice Guy does not seem to get that women confiding their relationship problems to a friend are not looking for the replacement model.&lt;/i&gt;

Ladies: there are friends and friends. Unless a guy is just like a brother to you, kindly do not confide your relationship problems in him. Save it for your girlfriends. Because a guy hearing a problem will first wonder why you are telling him this, and then try to solve it (this is not a cliche). Because, why else would you tell him if you didn't want his help? And the easiest way for a guy to solve your relationship problems is to replace the guy you're having the problems with. Especially if he's attracted to you. This works with women too, as the link points out: &lt;i&gt;Coincidentally, this tactic [complaining about a relationship problem] can sometimes score him a sympathy fuck if he's got a backup girl to run to.&lt;/i&gt;

Now, you might just be wanting some insight into the male mind. Tell the guy this up front. Say, &quot;You're a man. Why would you do X or Y? I &lt;b&gt;really like&lt;/b&gt; my boyfriend, but this thing he does drives me crazy.&quot; This should work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I liked and appreciated everything I read on Destructor&#8217;s link, except for this: <i>This is because a Nice Guy does not seem to get that women confiding their relationship problems to a friend are not looking for the replacement model.</i></p>
	<p>Ladies: there are friends and friends. Unless a guy is just like a brother to you, kindly do not confide your relationship problems in him. Save it for your girlfriends. Because a guy hearing a problem will first wonder why you are telling him this, and then try to solve it (this is not a cliche). Because, why else would you tell him if you didn&#8217;t want his help? And the easiest way for a guy to solve your relationship problems is to replace the guy you&#8217;re having the problems with. Especially if he&#8217;s attracted to you. This works with women too, as the link points out: <i>Coincidentally, this tactic [complaining about a relationship problem] can sometimes score him a sympathy fuck if he&#8217;s got a backup girl to run to.</i></p>
	<p>Now, you might just be wanting some insight into the male mind. Tell the guy this up front. Say, &#8220;You&#8217;re a man. Why would you do X or Y? I <b>really like</b> my boyfriend, but this thing he does drives me crazy.&#8221; This should work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doug S.</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490059</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490059</guid>
					<description>In high school, I was rather shy in many ways, and had numerous unrequited crushes on girls that were only interested in me as a friend. Many of them were in relationships with other people.

Although I had other issues (and probably still do), I never found myself asking &quot;why is she with that total jerk&quot; because, well, the boyfriend of the girl I liked was invariably someone I knew and respected. Clearly, they had known each other far longer than they knew me, and that was the reason I didn't have a chance. After all, &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I Want My Beloved To Be Happy&lt;/a&gt;, right? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In high school, I was rather shy in many ways, and had numerous unrequited crushes on girls that were only interested in me as a friend. Many of them were in relationships with other people.</p>
	<p>Although I had other issues (and probably still do), I never found myself asking &#8220;why is she with that total jerk&#8221; because, well, the boyfriend of the girl I liked was invariably someone I knew and respected. Clearly, they had known each other far longer than they knew me, and that was the reason I didn&#8217;t have a chance. After all, <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy" rel="nofollow">I Want My Beloved To Be Happy</a>, right?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490027</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/02/07/the-guide-to-nice-guys-in-comic-form/#comment-490027</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are men in general so fucked up that it’s *really* such a huge revelation when they realize that women are people with thoughts and feelings that should be/are independent from male desires?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you can generalize this to some extent: Are high school boys in general so fucked up that it’s *really* such a huge revelation when they realize that other people are people with thoughts and feelings that should be/are independent from their desires?

Yes, some of them are.  Most of them grow out of it.  Some don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Are men in general so fucked up that it’s *really* such a huge revelation when they realize that women are people with thoughts and feelings that should be/are independent from male desires?</p></blockquote>
	<p>I think you can generalize this to some extent: Are high school boys in general so fucked up that it’s *really* such a huge revelation when they realize that other people are people with thoughts and feelings that should be/are independent from their desires?</p>
	<p>Yes, some of them are.  Most of them grow out of it.  Some don&#8217;t.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
