<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, no, it&#8217;s your hand that will fall off if you go too long without</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jerry 101</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484814</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484814</guid>
					<description>I heard on NPR today that back in the latter 60's/early 70's that the Southern Baptist Convention once passed a resolution supporting the legalization of abortion.

Apparently, the shift of the evangelicals happened not over abortion availability during the Carter years, but over the not-for-profit tax status of Bob Jones University being revoked over it's no-blacks allowed policy.

Later, in preparation for Reagan, they decided that it would be more publicly palatable to pick abortion as their cause.  Cuz good old fashioned uncoded racism didn't sell as well.  

Another interesting thing they mentioned is that up until Reagan, evangelicals treated divorce as a subject worthy of ostracizing anyone in the congregation who divorces.  With the election of Reagan, suddenly divorce was no longer an issue.

That comic rocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I heard on NPR today that back in the latter 60&#8217;s/early 70&#8217;s that the Southern Baptist Convention once passed a resolution supporting the legalization of abortion.</p>
	<p>Apparently, the shift of the evangelicals happened not over abortion availability during the Carter years, but over the not-for-profit tax status of Bob Jones University being revoked over it&#8217;s no-blacks allowed policy.</p>
	<p>Later, in preparation for Reagan, they decided that it would be more publicly palatable to pick abortion as their cause.  Cuz good old fashioned uncoded racism didn&#8217;t sell as well.  </p>
	<p>Another interesting thing they mentioned is that up until Reagan, evangelicals treated divorce as a subject worthy of ostracizing anyone in the congregation who divorces.  With the election of Reagan, suddenly divorce was no longer an issue.</p>
	<p>That comic rocked.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: histrogeek</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484762</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484762</guid>
					<description>That comic is hysterical. It's so in keeping with the over-the-top, scare-mongering, &quot;moral hygine&quot; movement of the time. The same basic ideas that gave us &quot;Reefer Madness&quot; and &quot;I Accuse My Parents&quot; among others. 

The excellent thing is not just that it's yoked to the side of angels this time, but that it really gets at the audience that needs to hear it. It's speaking the language of people who believe that one joint will turn you into drug-crazed murderer or that sex before marriage will leave you a withered, unloveable, crazy cat woman. For the rest of us, it's just amusingly overwrought (as the whole genre is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That comic is hysterical. It&#8217;s so in keeping with the over-the-top, scare-mongering, &#8220;moral hygine&#8221; movement of the time. The same basic ideas that gave us &#8220;Reefer Madness&#8221; and &#8220;I Accuse My Parents&#8221; among others. </p>
	<p>The excellent thing is not just that it&#8217;s yoked to the side of angels this time, but that it really gets at the audience that needs to hear it. It&#8217;s speaking the language of people who believe that one joint will turn you into drug-crazed murderer or that sex before marriage will leave you a withered, unloveable, crazy cat woman. For the rest of us, it&#8217;s just amusingly overwrought (as the whole genre is).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wayward</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484692</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484692</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;
I’m a proud parent of seven great kids, and I find the tone of this comic to be extremely rude and insulting.
&lt;/i&gt;

I think that perhaps the author of this comment may be less than happy with her &quot;seven great kids,&quot; but doesn't want to acknowledge that she made a choice to have those kids.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i><br />
I’m a proud parent of seven great kids, and I find the tone of this comic to be extremely rude and insulting.<br />
</i></p>
	<p>I think that perhaps the author of this comment may be less than happy with her &#8220;seven great kids,&#8221; but doesn&#8217;t want to acknowledge that she made a choice to have those kids.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rebel L</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484543</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484543</guid>
					<description>&quot;I wonder how a mother of 10 or 12 would feel after reading this?&quot;

Don't be silly. Mothers of 10 or 12 don't have time to read. Or think too much. Or finish that degree. Or go for that promotion. 

That's why the wingnuts keep wanting to do away with contraception. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;I wonder how a mother of 10 or 12 would feel after reading this?&#8221;</p>
	<p>Don&#8217;t be silly. Mothers of 10 or 12 don&#8217;t have time to read. Or think too much. Or finish that degree. Or go for that promotion. </p>
	<p>That&#8217;s why the wingnuts keep wanting to do away with contraception.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ultra Magnus</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484529</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484529</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;I’m a proud parent of seven great kids, and I find the tone of this comic to be extremely rude and insulting.&lt;/em&gt;

I'm going to agree with Amanda that this just sounds like this woman has to validate her own choices by having everyone else support/follow them. Anything that veers outside of what she knows is offensive, just like for some people who don't want kids period end up &quot;insulting&quot; people who do. In this society everyone has to follow the same &quot;rules&quot; or else those who do will get pissed at those who don't because deep down they're probably second guessing themselves. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>I’m a proud parent of seven great kids, and I find the tone of this comic to be extremely rude and insulting.</em></p>
	<p>I&#8217;m going to agree with Amanda that this just sounds like this woman has to validate her own choices by having everyone else support/follow them. Anything that veers outside of what she knows is offensive, just like for some people who don&#8217;t want kids period end up &#8220;insulting&#8221; people who do. In this society everyone has to follow the same &#8220;rules&#8221; or else those who do will get pissed at those who don&#8217;t because deep down they&#8217;re probably second guessing themselves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mothworm</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484491</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484491</guid>
					<description>I can't get over the terror in the first panel. We comment a lot about how the wingnuts think pregnancy should be the appropriate punishment for sex, but there comes a point when the terror is so strong, sex itself is a punishment,because it's no longer about pleasure or communion--it's just another shit deal you have to live with. I suppose this is their goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I can&#8217;t get over the terror in the first panel. We comment a lot about how the wingnuts think pregnancy should be the appropriate punishment for sex, but there comes a point when the terror is so strong, sex itself is a punishment,because it&#8217;s no longer about pleasure or communion&#8211;it&#8217;s just another shit deal you have to live with. I suppose this is their goal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sirkowski</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484475</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484475</guid>
					<description>They're both smoking in the doctor's office... lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>They&#8217;re both smoking in the doctor&#8217;s office&#8230; lol
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cara</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484472</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484472</guid>
					<description>This was great.  Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This was great.  Thanks for sharing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paul</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484413</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484413</guid>
					<description>Maybe the wingnut was insulted because she thought everybody in the 50s already knew about birth control, despite the laws against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe the wingnut was insulted because she thought everybody in the 50s already knew about birth control, despite the laws against it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: purpleshoes</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484407</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/25/6625/#comment-484407</guid>
					<description>Also, I refer you to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ep.tc/problems/four/13.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;disco-licious&lt;/a&gt; 1970s comic on Captain V.D. I enjoy the part where it instructs teenagers faced with old-school doctors to just nod and smile and keep asking for penicillin. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Also, I refer you to this <a href="http://www.ep.tc/problems/four/13.html" rel="nofollow">disco-licious</a> 1970s comic on Captain V.D. I enjoy the part where it instructs teenagers faced with old-school doctors to just nod and smile and keep asking for penicillin.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
