<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if I wear the high heels with a ratty chenille bathrobe?</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: NoJoy</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-482172</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-482172</guid>
					<description>Let's pretend for a sec that nothing is plotted on the graph because you're free to &quot;mix-n-match&quot; whichever combination of shoes and guy turns you on. The labels on the Y axis still imply that female hotness increases as you go toward the wildly impractical and terribly uncomfortable shoes.

&lt;em&gt;Guys who make a point of saying that they don’t care about shoes/makeup/whatever trapping of femininity are generally the ones who are the most invested in maintaining gender roles.&lt;/em&gt;
Huh? Can you elaborate and/or back this generalization up?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Let&#8217;s pretend for a sec that nothing is plotted on the graph because you&#8217;re free to &#8220;mix-n-match&#8221; whichever combination of shoes and guy turns you on. The labels on the Y axis still imply that female hotness increases as you go toward the wildly impractical and terribly uncomfortable shoes.</p>
	<p><em>Guys who make a point of saying that they don’t care about shoes/makeup/whatever trapping of femininity are generally the ones who are the most invested in maintaining gender roles.</em><br />
Huh? Can you elaborate and/or back this generalization up?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ew</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-482144</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-482144</guid>
					<description>I hope this isn't posted twice - I got an error message the first time. 

    &quot;It’s the credit.com thing where the guy with his band is singing in a basement apartment as the guy’s wife does laundry. It has a jingle along the lines of “I married my dream girl..but her credit was bad.” and ends with “if only I had…I’d be a happy bachelor with a yard and a dog.”

    It might be OK if the woman wasn’t in the background doing housework.&quot;

The thing about this ad that bothers me the most is that it doesn't make sense given the situation.  1)  The guy could still apply for a mortgage by himself, even if he is married, and then his wife's credit score wouldn't matter at all.  He might not be able to get a large enough mortgage to buy a house with a yard without her income, but then he wouldn't be able to buy a house as a bachelor either.  2) Presumably his wife didn't tell him about her credit score, so why would she give him access to it through this credit report service?  Does it give you credit reports on anyone?  The ad doesn't seem to be trying to imply that.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope this isn&#8217;t posted twice - I got an error message the first time. </p>
	<p>    &#8220;It’s the credit.com thing where the guy with his band is singing in a basement apartment as the guy’s wife does laundry. It has a jingle along the lines of “I married my dream girl..but her credit was bad.” and ends with “if only I had…I’d be a happy bachelor with a yard and a dog.”</p>
	<p>    It might be OK if the woman wasn’t in the background doing housework.&#8221;</p>
	<p>The thing about this ad that bothers me the most is that it doesn&#8217;t make sense given the situation.  1)  The guy could still apply for a mortgage by himself, even if he is married, and then his wife&#8217;s credit score wouldn&#8217;t matter at all.  He might not be able to get a large enough mortgage to buy a house with a yard without her income, but then he wouldn&#8217;t be able to buy a house as a bachelor either.  2) Presumably his wife didn&#8217;t tell him about her credit score, so why would she give him access to it through this credit report service?  Does it give you credit reports on anyone?  The ad doesn&#8217;t seem to be trying to imply that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Godless Heathen</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481777</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481777</guid>
					<description>What man do you get if you wear your sneakers on the way to work, but change into the pumps when you're at the office?  If you're slipping into your pumps while you're talking to a guy, do his pecs magically firm up?  Do you have to teeter around on heels all the time to keep him from sagging?

I have to agree that they're advocating polyamory, I have four pairs of pumps alone, that's a lot of hot headless guys!

(BTW, the loafers guy is built just like my hubby.  Shame on me for liking comfy shoes, I've ruined his physique with my selfishness!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What man do you get if you wear your sneakers on the way to work, but change into the pumps when you&#8217;re at the office?  If you&#8217;re slipping into your pumps while you&#8217;re talking to a guy, do his pecs magically firm up?  Do you have to teeter around on heels all the time to keep him from sagging?</p>
	<p>I have to agree that they&#8217;re advocating polyamory, I have four pairs of pumps alone, that&#8217;s a lot of hot headless guys!</p>
	<p>(BTW, the loafers guy is built just like my hubby.  Shame on me for liking comfy shoes, I&#8217;ve ruined his physique with my selfishness!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Samantha Vimes</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481760</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481760</guid>
					<description>You're all missing the point of the ad. It's a pro-polyamory ad! 

You wouldn't wear any of those shoes for all occasions, right? So pick several boyfriends so you have the right one for every occasion. 

No, I don't really think that was what they were going for, but it would make more sense than any other interpretation I can think of. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You&#8217;re all missing the point of the ad. It&#8217;s a pro-polyamory ad! </p>
	<p>You wouldn&#8217;t wear any of those shoes for all occasions, right? So pick several boyfriends so you have the right one for every occasion. </p>
	<p>No, I don&#8217;t really think that was what they were going for, but it would make more sense than any other interpretation I can think of.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: schrody</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481757</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481757</guid>
					<description>Holly -

Now, your fixed version makes an awesome ad! I would really love to buy those shoes after seeing that ad. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Holly -</p>
	<p>Now, your fixed version makes an awesome ad! I would really love to buy those shoes after seeing that ad.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: signthelist</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481735</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481735</guid>
					<description>I just kept picturing the dudes in the shoes.

And I don't know, I think it's the tightie whiteys, or the lack of heads, but I'm not digging any of those boys. I guess I'm a man-hating feminist! Them's the breaks.

Also, I like the new credit report jingle, realityfighter. I can't stand that commercial, for all reasons mentioned, but mostly because IT IS NOT A FREE CREDIT REPORT. Not when you go through that site, anyway. You get automatically enrolled in TRIPLE-ADVANTAGE CREDIT PROTECTOR or some shit, for which you have to pay. That's not free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just kept picturing the dudes in the shoes.</p>
	<p>And I don&#8217;t know, I think it&#8217;s the tightie whiteys, or the lack of heads, but I&#8217;m not digging any of those boys. I guess I&#8217;m a man-hating feminist! Them&#8217;s the breaks.</p>
	<p>Also, I like the new credit report jingle, realityfighter. I can&#8217;t stand that commercial, for all reasons mentioned, but mostly because IT IS NOT A FREE CREDIT REPORT. Not when you go through that site, anyway. You get automatically enrolled in TRIPLE-ADVANTAGE CREDIT PROTECTOR or some shit, for which you have to pay. That&#8217;s not free!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: signthelist</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481734</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481734</guid>
					<description>I just kept picturing the dudes in the shoes.

And I don't know, I think it's the tightie whiteys, or the lack of heads, but I'm not digging any of those boys. I guess I'm a man-hating feminist! Them's the breaks.

Also, I like the new credit report jingle, realityfighter. I can't stand that commercial, for all reasons mentioned, but mostly because IT IS NOT A FREE CREDIT REPORT. Not when you go through that site, anyway. You get automatically enrolled in TRIPLE-ADVANTAGE CREDIT PROTECTOR or some shit, for which you have to pay. That's not free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just kept picturing the dudes in the shoes.</p>
	<p>And I don&#8217;t know, I think it&#8217;s the tightie whiteys, or the lack of heads, but I&#8217;m not digging any of those boys. I guess I&#8217;m a man-hating feminist! Them&#8217;s the breaks.</p>
	<p>Also, I like the new credit report jingle, realityfighter. I can&#8217;t stand that commercial, for all reasons mentioned, but mostly because IT IS NOT A FREE CREDIT REPORT. Not when you go through that site, anyway. You get automatically enrolled in TRIPLE-ADVANTAGE CREDIT PROTECTOR or some shit, for which you have to pay. That&#8217;s not free!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kali</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481709</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481709</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;The fundamental problem with this ad is the mistaken premise that straight men give a shit about the shoes a woman is wearing.&lt;/i&gt;

This is completely ridiculous, you know.Straight men compliment my shoes all the time, and I can't even wear high heels. Men like boots, I've noticed. They don't even have to be sexy boots. Just... boot-shaped.  

And, because it bears repeating, heels change the shape of your legs. And your ass. And your walk. In ways that men are conditioned to find sexy.

Plus a lot of men who say they don't care about this stuff would actually be quite annoyed if their groomed girlfriend started going round in sneakers. Guys who make a point of saying that they don't care about shoes/makeup/whatever trapping of femininity are generally the ones who are the most invested in maintaining gender roles. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>The fundamental problem with this ad is the mistaken premise that straight men give a shit about the shoes a woman is wearing.</i></p>
	<p>This is completely ridiculous, you know.Straight men compliment my shoes all the time, and I can&#8217;t even wear high heels. Men like boots, I&#8217;ve noticed. They don&#8217;t even have to be sexy boots. Just&#8230; boot-shaped.  </p>
	<p>And, because it bears repeating, heels change the shape of your legs. And your ass. And your walk. In ways that men are conditioned to find sexy.</p>
	<p>Plus a lot of men who say they don&#8217;t care about this stuff would actually be quite annoyed if their groomed girlfriend started going round in sneakers. Guys who make a point of saying that they don&#8217;t care about shoes/makeup/whatever trapping of femininity are generally the ones who are the most invested in maintaining gender roles.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doctor Science, Diety of Leftover Chinese Food</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481660</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481660</guid>
					<description>Or maybe the ad really *is* interactive where it's actually running, and you can (by clicking) see the guy of your choice in the shoes of your choice. That would actually be amusing and witty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Or maybe the ad really *is* interactive where it&#8217;s actually running, and you can (by clicking) see the guy of your choice in the shoes of your choice. That would actually be amusing and witty.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Holly</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481634</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/01/14/6561/#comment-481634</guid>
					<description>Wow, what a dumb ad.

Here, I fixed it so that it would make more sense.

http://www.halfrobot.com/imgs/harveynichols.revised.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow, what a dumb ad.</p>
	<p>Here, I fixed it so that it would make more sense.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.halfrobot.com/imgs/harveynichols.revised.jpg' rel='nofollow'>http://www.halfrobot.com/imgs/harveynichols.revised.jpg</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
