<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rape in war?  Impossible!</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: gnaddrig</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-474306</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-474306</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I find it hard to believe the US or even the evil Halliburton would cover up a gang rape. Doesn’t the US have an interest in ferreting out such malefactors and duly punishing them?

I can't say this is nonsense, but it does all seem a bit hard to believe.?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, how do I put this - various US governments have been caught perpetrating and covering up things that make a gang rape almost look harmless in comparison. And as for Halliburton - at the end of the day, this is about money, isn't it? They would do anything not to lose their Irak contracts. Covering up a gang rape, say by arranging for a tragical accident on the job, would be peanuts to them.

But when Ace finds it hard to believe, we must be wrong, and Jones must be lying, no question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>I find it hard to believe the US or even the evil Halliburton would cover up a gang rape. Doesn’t the US have an interest in ferreting out such malefactors and duly punishing them?</p>
	<p>I can&#8217;t say this is nonsense, but it does all seem a bit hard to believe.?</p></blockquote>
	<p>Well, how do I put this - various US governments have been caught perpetrating and covering up things that make a gang rape almost look harmless in comparison. And as for Halliburton - at the end of the day, this is about money, isn&#8217;t it? They would do anything not to lose their Irak contracts. Covering up a gang rape, say by arranging for a tragical accident on the job, would be peanuts to them.</p>
	<p>But when Ace finds it hard to believe, we must be wrong, and Jones must be lying, no question.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: firefall</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473512</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473512</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I see no reason to think rape deniers are any different. If they haven’t actually done it themselves, they get off on the idea of it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I very much doubt that Ace, or most of them, have the actual nerve to go through with it, in normal circumstances - so living vicariously is even more precious to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p> I see no reason to think rape deniers are any different. If they haven’t actually done it themselves, they get off on the idea of it.</p></blockquote>
	<p>I very much doubt that Ace, or most of them, have the actual nerve to go through with it, in normal circumstances - so living vicariously is even more precious to them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: seeker6079</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473504</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473504</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;(To quote an ex-friend of mine: I can’t be racist, Bette, I’m friend with *you*.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;(Sighs.)  I remember the good old days when it was just us and the blacks and asians in the country club, and the only boondoggles allowed in were as waitresses.  Great days, gone forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>(To quote an ex-friend of mine: I can’t be racist, Bette, I’m friend with *you*.)</blockquote>
(Sighs.)  I remember the good old days when it was just us and the blacks and asians in the country club, and the only boondoggles allowed in were as waitresses.  Great days, gone forever.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bernarda</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473493</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473493</guid>
					<description>Why haven't the names of the Halliburton guys been published? If there is some supposed legal reason, at least their nationalities and past experience could be mentioned. Many of these mercenaries come from military and security forces in places like Pinochet Chile, Apartheid South Africa, Serbia, etc. where they were involved in torture, murder, war crimes, and general human rights abuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why haven&#8217;t the names of the Halliburton guys been published? If there is some supposed legal reason, at least their nationalities and past experience could be mentioned. Many of these mercenaries come from military and security forces in places like Pinochet Chile, Apartheid South Africa, Serbia, etc. where they were involved in torture, murder, war crimes, and general human rights abuses.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RobW, Sushi No Gakusei</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473397</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473397</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;In that case this rape victim would be getting the Richard Clarke/Paul O’Neill/Joe Wilson treatment?&lt;/i&gt;

Remember that the treatment in Wilson's case was to ruin his wife's career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>In that case this rape victim would be getting the Richard Clarke/Paul O’Neill/Joe Wilson treatment?</i></p>
	<p>Remember that the treatment in Wilson&#8217;s case was to ruin his wife&#8217;s career.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sheesh</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473380</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473380</guid>
					<description>I can see why they'd want to deny it happened.  They are all enablers of this horrible situation and they have blood on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I can see why they&#8217;d want to deny it happened.  They are all enablers of this horrible situation and they have blood on their hands.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sour Kraut, Tyrant of Tuna</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473367</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473367</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m more of the mind he identifies with sexual abuse of women in general and that this wasn’t an issue of political defense.&lt;/i&gt;

I have no doubt, deep6.  But it's a confusing situation for Ace: on the one hand--despite his misogyny--he's able to sense that there's something horribly wrong with gang rape; but the idea that said crime was committed by employees of KBR, a firm entrusted by the great and infalliable King George to carry out His will, is inherently ludicrous to him.  Therefore, the woman must be a BDS-afflicted, leftist affiliated &lt;i&gt;thing&lt;/i&gt; which is attacking KBR(and Bushco by proxy) out of spite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>I’m more of the mind he identifies with sexual abuse of women in general and that this wasn’t an issue of political defense.</i></p>
	<p>I have no doubt, deep6.  But it&#8217;s a confusing situation for Ace: on the one hand&#8211;despite his misogyny&#8211;he&#8217;s able to sense that there&#8217;s something horribly wrong with gang rape; but the idea that said crime was committed by employees of KBR, a firm entrusted by the great and infalliable King George to carry out His will, is inherently ludicrous to him.  Therefore, the woman must be a BDS-afflicted, leftist affiliated <i>thing</i> which is attacking KBR(and Bushco by proxy) out of spite.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deep6</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473358</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473358</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ace is horrified by the accusation. It’s tarnishing the image of KBR and, by extension, Bushco.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting angle.  Rape = KBR = Halliburton = Cheney = Bush = ...Ace of Spades, Bush supporter?

Nowhere in there do we find the woman.

I wasn't of the impression that he was somehow subconsiously identifying with guilt for *this* rape, though now that I've built on Sour Kraut's idea it's something I'm going to have to think about.  I'm more of the mind he identifies with sexual abuse of women in general and that this wasn't an issue of political defense.

Though, yeah, there's nothing Republican monsters won't defend about their party's &quot;values&quot; by tearing other people down.  In that case this rape victim would be getting the Richard Clarke/Paul O'Neill/Joe Wilson treatment?



 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Ace is horrified by the accusation. It’s tarnishing the image of KBR and, by extension, Bushco.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Interesting angle.  Rape = KBR = Halliburton = Cheney = Bush = &#8230;Ace of Spades, Bush supporter?</p>
	<p>Nowhere in there do we find the woman.</p>
	<p>I wasn&#8217;t of the impression that he was somehow subconsiously identifying with guilt for *this* rape, though now that I&#8217;ve built on Sour Kraut&#8217;s idea it&#8217;s something I&#8217;m going to have to think about.  I&#8217;m more of the mind he identifies with sexual abuse of women in general and that this wasn&#8217;t an issue of political defense.</p>
	<p>Though, yeah, there&#8217;s nothing Republican monsters won&#8217;t defend about their party&#8217;s &#8220;values&#8221; by tearing other people down.  In that case this rape victim would be getting the Richard Clarke/Paul O&#8217;Neill/Joe Wilson treatment?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Betty Boondoogle</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473351</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473351</guid>
					<description>&quot;I don’t wonder. It’s the only thing that makes sense. &quot;

Agreed. In my experience it's always the most racist person who gets the most defensive about race issues.  (To quote an ex-friend of mine: I can't be racist, Bette, I'm friend with *you*.)  

I see no reason to think rape deniers are any different.  If they haven't actually done it themselves, they get off on the idea of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;I don’t wonder. It’s the only thing that makes sense. &#8221;</p>
	<p>Agreed. In my experience it&#8217;s always the most racist person who gets the most defensive about race issues.  (To quote an ex-friend of mine: I can&#8217;t be racist, Bette, I&#8217;m friend with *you*.)  </p>
	<p>I see no reason to think rape deniers are any different.  If they haven&#8217;t actually done it themselves, they get off on the idea of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amanda Marcotte</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473341</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/rape-in-war-impossible/#comment-473341</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Hey, the kid hangs upside down on the monkey bars long enough, you start to worry that he’s going to pass out and really hurt himself, so you say, “Yes, I see you, Timmy” and go about your business.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, and the &quot;she's lying&quot; charge is part of a larger denialist tapestry that encompasses the people claiming that waterboarding isn't torture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Hey, the kid hangs upside down on the monkey bars long enough, you start to worry that he’s going to pass out and really hurt himself, so you say, “Yes, I see you, Timmy” and go about your business.</i></p>
	<p>Well, and the &#8220;she&#8217;s lying&#8221; charge is part of a larger denialist tapestry that encompasses the people claiming that waterboarding isn&#8217;t torture.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
