<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gee, isn&#8217;t adultery one of the Big 10?</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Hector B.</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468351</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468351</guid>
					<description>I think I get it. Suddenly, resident alien was no longer Master of His Domain, in the Seinfeldian sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think I get it. Suddenly, resident alien was no longer Master of His Domain, in the Seinfeldian sense.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: resident_alien</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468337</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 03:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468337</guid>
					<description>@ Eric:What snit exactly?Hector B. questioned whether the DNA-sets of brothers were at all sufficiently different for an effective paternity test.I explained that only the DNA of identical twins is sufficiently similar to render a paternity test ineffective.(My dirty mind then produced some rather impure thoughts involving identical twins,which I continued to savour offline.)I later logged on again to find you telling me that fraternal twins exist,which is kinda akin to saying:&quot;There are cars that run on diesel,didn't you know?&quot;If I weren't aware of the difference between fraternal and identical twins,I hardly would have specifically said &quot;identical twins&quot; in my first post,right?EVERYBODY knows twins can be fraternal or identical,so you basically called me an idiot.I heartily return the compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@ Eric:What snit exactly?Hector B. questioned whether the DNA-sets of brothers were at all sufficiently different for an effective paternity test.I explained that only the DNA of identical twins is sufficiently similar to render a paternity test ineffective.(My dirty mind then produced some rather impure thoughts involving identical twins,which I continued to savour offline.)I later logged on again to find you telling me that fraternal twins exist,which is kinda akin to saying:&#8221;There are cars that run on diesel,didn&#8217;t you know?&#8221;If I weren&#8217;t aware of the difference between fraternal and identical twins,I hardly would have specifically said &#8220;identical twins&#8221; in my first post,right?EVERYBODY knows twins can be fraternal or identical,so you basically called me an idiot.I heartily return the compliment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Indy</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468333</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468333</guid>
					<description>my uncle...my father... my uncle ... my father

/obligatory chinatown &quot;joke&quot;.

the part I missed is why exactly the younger paulk took it into his head to do this paternity test thing. Did he start to suspect something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>my uncle&#8230;my father&#8230; my uncle &#8230; my father</p>
	<p>/obligatory chinatown &#8220;joke&#8221;.</p>
	<p>the part I missed is why exactly the younger paulk took it into his head to do this paternity test thing. Did he start to suspect something?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric, rejector of memes</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468310</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468310</guid>
					<description>ra, if you're so knowledgable, why the original snit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ra, if you&#8217;re so knowledgable, why the original snit?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: neil</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468304</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468304</guid>
					<description>Now, are we supposed to stone the two adulterers in the marketplace, or should we wait for the Lord to smite them? I forget how these rules work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Now, are we supposed to stone the two adulterers in the marketplace, or should we wait for the Lord to smite them? I forget how these rules work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kate</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468300</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468300</guid>
					<description>I googled and the first hit brought up this article and interview with Mona Brewer: 

&lt;em&gt;&quot;I mean, everybody wanted to talk to him. And he just invited me to his office to talk to him for a few minutes. And that was really incredible.&quot;

&quot;He said, ‘well, I guess you will just have to take your clothes off, because I'm going to have to love you.’ Whoa. And I thought, oh, God. You know, I didn't want to do it, but what choice did I have? I mean, I have been taught for all these years not to question him. And I had this word from God. I mean, God obviously wanted me to do this. And it was so foreign to me, but I -- I didn't know what else to do. I was on the spot. So, I took off my clothes, and we did it.&quot;

She went on to explain how she was at his beck and call for sexual services for the next fourteen years. Paulk shared her with members of his family and visiting charismatic preachers. Paulk excused his behavior with his own personal theology called &quot;Kingdom Relationships.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

That &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a cult, when the concentration of power is on one individual and the individual's needs trump the supposed goals of the organization, or when the organization has no other goal but to worship at the feet of the leader(s) as a supreme being who claims to have superseded and/or readjusted the most basic human moral codes in order to satisfy themselves.

Like all other organizations like this, what a tragic waste of human energy, funds and resources!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I googled and the first hit brought up this article and interview with Mona Brewer: </p>
	<p><em>&#8220;I mean, everybody wanted to talk to him. And he just invited me to his office to talk to him for a few minutes. And that was really incredible.&#8221;</p>
	<p>&#8220;He said, ‘well, I guess you will just have to take your clothes off, because I&#8217;m going to have to love you.’ Whoa. And I thought, oh, God. You know, I didn&#8217;t want to do it, but what choice did I have? I mean, I have been taught for all these years not to question him. And I had this word from God. I mean, God obviously wanted me to do this. And it was so foreign to me, but I &#8212; I didn&#8217;t know what else to do. I was on the spot. So, I took off my clothes, and we did it.&#8221;</p>
	<p>She went on to explain how she was at his beck and call for sexual services for the next fourteen years. Paulk shared her with members of his family and visiting charismatic preachers. Paulk excused his behavior with his own personal theology called &#8220;Kingdom Relationships.&#8221;</em></p>
	<p>That <em>is</em> a cult, when the concentration of power is on one individual and the individual&#8217;s needs trump the supposed goals of the organization, or when the organization has no other goal but to worship at the feet of the leader(s) as a supreme being who claims to have superseded and/or readjusted the most basic human moral codes in order to satisfy themselves.</p>
	<p>Like all other organizations like this, what a tragic waste of human energy, funds and resources!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mercurial Georgia</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468293</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468293</guid>
					<description>It's gotten really bad, cause my first thought was, at least this one slept with someone his own age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s gotten really bad, cause my first thought was, at least this one slept with someone his own age.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deep6</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468276</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468276</guid>
					<description>It's alright, everyone.  The Paulk family has expelled Satan from their lives and may now concentrate on living Christ-like, moral, pro-family values... while they defame Mona Brewer and insist she's a confused whore out for cash.

Jesus saves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s alright, everyone.  The Paulk family has expelled Satan from their lives and may now concentrate on living Christ-like, moral, pro-family values&#8230; while they defame Mona Brewer and insist she&#8217;s a confused whore out for cash.</p>
	<p>Jesus saves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nobody in Particular</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468269</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468269</guid>
					<description>LOL. The ad at the top of this post is for PacHills Rehab Centers &amp;#8212; &quot;America's Leading Christian Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Centers.&quot;

Also, I wonder of John &quot;Ex-Gay&quot; Paulk is any relation to these people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>LOL. The ad at the top of this post is for PacHills Rehab Centers &#8212; &#8220;America&#8217;s Leading Christian Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Centers.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Also, I wonder of John &#8220;Ex-Gay&#8221; Paulk is any relation to these people?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468267</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/11/22/gee-isnt-adultery-one-of-the-big-10/#comment-468267</guid>
					<description>All I kept thinking when I heard this story was:  How does someone get manipulated into a 14 year-long affair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>All I kept thinking when I heard this story was:  How does someone get manipulated into a 14 year-long affair?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
