<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flushing birth control pills and poking holes in condoms</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Courtney</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-468325</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-468325</guid>
					<description>My biggest problem with the people on here who are trumpeting about she-devils is that it completely undermines the issue. Not that you can't get off topic without me complaining, but when you say, BUT LADIES ARE MEAN TO MEN TOO, you ignore the issue faced by women who are forced into pregnancies and conflate the two problems, of which I would say the most problematic is men forcing gestation on women. When a woman gets pregnant and gives a man legal responsibility for a child, she is only (I'm not trying to undermine this behavior, just point out the differences) infringing on his monetary responsibilities. If a man forces a woman to get pregnant, she can die from it. Pregnancy is not pretty, and it is certainly more dangerous for a woman than taking money from her. To compare the two undermines the physical abuse that is present in the issue at hand. Forced gestation is barbaric in a way that manipulating a man's finances is not.

It also ignores the reasoning behind this abuse (as indicated in the OT). This reminds me of blogs that mention female genital mutilation, where some person (usually some persecution-complex male) will protest, BUT MALE CIRCUMCISION IS BAD TOO! It is; I completely agree. But to compare the two refuses to address the motivation behind genital mutilation, a motivation which is not there when circumcising a boy, and that is male domination over women and their bodies. The motivation in this issue and in female genital mutilation is extremely troubling, and that's what we should be focusing on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My biggest problem with the people on here who are trumpeting about she-devils is that it completely undermines the issue. Not that you can&#8217;t get off topic without me complaining, but when you say, BUT LADIES ARE MEAN TO MEN TOO, you ignore the issue faced by women who are forced into pregnancies and conflate the two problems, of which I would say the most problematic is men forcing gestation on women. When a woman gets pregnant and gives a man legal responsibility for a child, she is only (I&#8217;m not trying to undermine this behavior, just point out the differences) infringing on his monetary responsibilities. If a man forces a woman to get pregnant, she can die from it. Pregnancy is not pretty, and it is certainly more dangerous for a woman than taking money from her. To compare the two undermines the physical abuse that is present in the issue at hand. Forced gestation is barbaric in a way that manipulating a man&#8217;s finances is not.</p>
	<p>It also ignores the reasoning behind this abuse (as indicated in the OT). This reminds me of blogs that mention female genital mutilation, where some person (usually some persecution-complex male) will protest, BUT MALE CIRCUMCISION IS BAD TOO! It is; I completely agree. But to compare the two refuses to address the motivation behind genital mutilation, a motivation which is not there when circumcising a boy, and that is male domination over women and their bodies. The motivation in this issue and in female genital mutilation is extremely troubling, and that&#8217;s what we should be focusing on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: midevil</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-468023</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-468023</guid>
					<description>I know two women who purposely got pregnant by lying about being on birth control.  One is my father's girlfriend and the other is my old best friend's gf.

My child's biopop raped me and that's how he came about.  My parents said I deserved it.  I was trying to get away from him and he was stalking me--even though I spent most of the time with him covered in bruises on my arms and legs, they said I wanted it and said things like &quot;what did you do to deserve it?&quot;  Afterwards, it was HIS mother that counseled me because he wanted another one and I didn't.  I went on the pill and lied about it.  My father also tried to convince me to have another, because it wasn't fair to my first if I didn't.  Later, when I got away from the wife beater, my father said it was better to have a violent father around for the baby than none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I know two women who purposely got pregnant by lying about being on birth control.  One is my father&#8217;s girlfriend and the other is my old best friend&#8217;s gf.</p>
	<p>My child&#8217;s biopop raped me and that&#8217;s how he came about.  My parents said I deserved it.  I was trying to get away from him and he was stalking me&#8211;even though I spent most of the time with him covered in bruises on my arms and legs, they said I wanted it and said things like &#8220;what did you do to deserve it?&#8221;  Afterwards, it was HIS mother that counseled me because he wanted another one and I didn&#8217;t.  I went on the pill and lied about it.  My father also tried to convince me to have another, because it wasn&#8217;t fair to my first if I didn&#8217;t.  Later, when I got away from the wife beater, my father said it was better to have a violent father around for the baby than none.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vito</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-456599</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:42:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-456599</guid>
					<description>If women are victims of their own perceived gender roles in society, men are victims of society's expectations as well. It's not some deep sociopathic undercurrent, it's a biological imperative. If you want to stop this behavior, you'd do best to stop trying to condemn the culture and start trying to educate boys on how to become men.

Seems like there's way too much disdain for men who do bad things and way too much compassion for women who do bad things. There's no need to morally condemn anyone if you want to take up the argument that people are victims of their own environment. And definitely no need to give anyone who's disingenous an excuse they can use to justify their own bad behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If women are victims of their own perceived gender roles in society, men are victims of society&#8217;s expectations as well. It&#8217;s not some deep sociopathic undercurrent, it&#8217;s a biological imperative. If you want to stop this behavior, you&#8217;d do best to stop trying to condemn the culture and start trying to educate boys on how to become men.</p>
	<p>Seems like there&#8217;s way too much disdain for men who do bad things and way too much compassion for women who do bad things. There&#8217;s no need to morally condemn anyone if you want to take up the argument that people are victims of their own environment. And definitely no need to give anyone who&#8217;s disingenous an excuse they can use to justify their own bad behavior.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: KP</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454818</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:37:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454818</guid>
					<description>@nyr
Could you please read the post before commenting.  She &lt;i&gt;gave&lt;/i&gt; you the statistics in there.  She also has a second post, linked above, where spoke more about this subject.  

As for child support, did you just completely ignore all the commenters saying that it's usually easy for a man to get out of it if has a mind to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@nyr<br />
Could you please read the post before commenting.  She <i>gave</i> you the statistics in there.  She also has a second post, linked above, where spoke more about this subject.  </p>
	<p>As for child support, did you just completely ignore all the commenters saying that it&#8217;s usually easy for a man to get out of it if has a mind to?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nyr</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454758</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:16:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454758</guid>
					<description>Does anyone have any statstics on this? Because I've never heard of men trying to force girlfriends into getting pregnant. I'm not saying it doesn't happen ever, but is it really a huge problem?

In the example -- a man gets a woman pregnant so he can control her -- this guy faces the prospect of having a kid he doesn't want and being legally responsible for 18 years of child care. I don't think many men logically want this. I think the vast majority of men who have sex with women they do not want to have a long-term relationship with are not thrilled at the prospect of pregnancy.

That's assuming some rationality on the part of the man, but how many men are so unglued that they want to create this major obligation for themselves? Again, no doubt there are such men, but it would fall on the edges of human behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Does anyone have any statstics on this? Because I&#8217;ve never heard of men trying to force girlfriends into getting pregnant. I&#8217;m not saying it doesn&#8217;t happen ever, but is it really a huge problem?</p>
	<p>In the example &#8212; a man gets a woman pregnant so he can control her &#8212; this guy faces the prospect of having a kid he doesn&#8217;t want and being legally responsible for 18 years of child care. I don&#8217;t think many men logically want this. I think the vast majority of men who have sex with women they do not want to have a long-term relationship with are not thrilled at the prospect of pregnancy.</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s assuming some rationality on the part of the man, but how many men are so unglued that they want to create this major obligation for themselves? Again, no doubt there are such men, but it would fall on the edges of human behavior.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mighty Ponygirl</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454031</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:53:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454031</guid>
					<description>JoAnne -- I don't think that a man would sabotage a condom to go &quot;bareback,&quot; because it seems that the whole point of bareback is that the sex isn't desensitized from a condom. Putting a pinhole in a condom isn't going to increase the sensation of sex, it's purely to keep the girl in line by getting her knocked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>JoAnne &#8212; I don&#8217;t think that a man would sabotage a condom to go &#8220;bareback,&#8221; because it seems that the whole point of bareback is that the sex isn&#8217;t desensitized from a condom. Putting a pinhole in a condom isn&#8217;t going to increase the sensation of sex, it&#8217;s purely to keep the girl in line by getting her knocked up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JoAnne</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454029</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:43:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-454029</guid>
					<description>Lynn Gazis-Sax:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think that some people may be inflating their numbers by taking any case where a woman is knowingly imperfect in her birth control use as a knowing attempt to get pregnant.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Absolutely.  If a woman does not wish to have an abortion after failed birth control, or doesn't realize she's pregnant until it's too late, it must be because she wants to victimize the man.  Because it's all about the mens.

Men also sabotage condom use so they can go &quot;bareback&quot; without the woman knowing.  If she gets pregnant, no skin off his nose.

ginmar:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And so we’re back to square one, which is where women were thirty years ago: you could get awarded child support in court, but nobody would collect it and the hubby wouldn’t pay it because the bitch didn’t deserve it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
That's not universal, of course, many men do pay.  My brother paid on time every month even when his wife moved with the kids across the country.  But he probably could have skipped on it with little consequence had he not been a mensch about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lynn Gazis-Sax:</p>
	<blockquote><p>I think that some people may be inflating their numbers by taking any case where a woman is knowingly imperfect in her birth control use as a knowing attempt to get pregnant.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Absolutely.  If a woman does not wish to have an abortion after failed birth control, or doesn&#8217;t realize she&#8217;s pregnant until it&#8217;s too late, it must be because she wants to victimize the man.  Because it&#8217;s all about the mens.</p>
	<p>Men also sabotage condom use so they can go &#8220;bareback&#8221; without the woman knowing.  If she gets pregnant, no skin off his nose.</p>
	<p>ginmar:</p>
	<blockquote><p>And so we’re back to square one, which is where women were thirty years ago: you could get awarded child support in court, but nobody would collect it and the hubby wouldn’t pay it because the bitch didn’t deserve it. </p></blockquote>
	<p>That&#8217;s not universal, of course, many men do pay.  My brother paid on time every month even when his wife moved with the kids across the country.  But he probably could have skipped on it with little consequence had he not been a mensch about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lynn Gazis-Sax</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-453965</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:51:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-453965</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Well, I don’t get out much so I can’t testify from any personal knowledge about these alleged hordes of pregnancy-trap setting she-devils. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
While some pregnancy-trap setting women probably do exist (I haven't met any personally, but I've known enough manipulative people of both sexes to suppose just about every kind of manipulation can be found somewhere), I think that some people may be inflating their numbers by taking any case where a woman is knowingly imperfect in her birth control use as a knowing attempt to get pregnant.  For example, a man and a woman, in the throes of mutual lust, both have sex without using or bothering to ask about birth control.  Some people would assume the woman &lt;em&gt;can't&lt;/em&gt; have just gotten carried away by desire, the same as the man; she must have &lt;em&gt;intended&lt;/em&gt; to get pregnant.  Or a man mostly uses condoms, but sometimes gets careless; he's careless.  A woman mostly takes her pill, but some days forgets; she's sabotaging things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>
Well, I don’t get out much so I can’t testify from any personal knowledge about these alleged hordes of pregnancy-trap setting she-devils.
</p></blockquote>
	<p>While some pregnancy-trap setting women probably do exist (I haven&#8217;t met any personally, but I&#8217;ve known enough manipulative people of both sexes to suppose just about every kind of manipulation can be found somewhere), I think that some people may be inflating their numbers by taking any case where a woman is knowingly imperfect in her birth control use as a knowing attempt to get pregnant.  For example, a man and a woman, in the throes of mutual lust, both have sex without using or bothering to ask about birth control.  Some people would assume the woman <em>can&#8217;t</em> have just gotten carried away by desire, the same as the man; she must have <em>intended</em> to get pregnant.  Or a man mostly uses condoms, but sometimes gets careless; he&#8217;s careless.  A woman mostly takes her pill, but some days forgets; she&#8217;s sabotaging things.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: felagund</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-453960</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:20:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-453960</guid>
					<description>At my university it is one of those secrets that everyone knows that there are about a dozen male professors who got their much younger undergraduate lovers pregnant and used this as leverage to extract themselves from their families and start new families with younger women. I have no idea whether or to what extent there was mutual desire for a child involved in the pregnancy. It's just jaw-dropping how often I'll meet one of my nebbishy 50-ish colleagues from some distant department and he's with a 33yo hottie with a toddler. 

This isn't really germane, since I don't think there's a lot of abuse going on in these relationships -- just total cluelessness. However, it bears notice because it makes me wonder who gets what out of relationships and how much it varies from person to person. Most of the wives seem reasonably content with their lot, but it's hard for me to put myself in the position of a young woman who wants to have a baby with her professor, and marry him even though he's so much older. Maybe it gives them structure.

It's really weird reading this article next to the John Q TV ads. I mean, you've gotta make a living, and I really dislike it when people hold a blogger responsible for the content of her ads, but it's just weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>At my university it is one of those secrets that everyone knows that there are about a dozen male professors who got their much younger undergraduate lovers pregnant and used this as leverage to extract themselves from their families and start new families with younger women. I have no idea whether or to what extent there was mutual desire for a child involved in the pregnancy. It&#8217;s just jaw-dropping how often I&#8217;ll meet one of my nebbishy 50-ish colleagues from some distant department and he&#8217;s with a 33yo hottie with a toddler. </p>
	<p>This isn&#8217;t really germane, since I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a lot of abuse going on in these relationships &#8212; just total cluelessness. However, it bears notice because it makes me wonder who gets what out of relationships and how much it varies from person to person. Most of the wives seem reasonably content with their lot, but it&#8217;s hard for me to put myself in the position of a young woman who wants to have a baby with her professor, and marry him even though he&#8217;s so much older. Maybe it gives them structure.</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s really weird reading this article next to the John Q TV ads. I mean, you&#8217;ve gotta make a living, and I really dislike it when people hold a blogger responsible for the content of her ads, but it&#8217;s just weird.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: the frog queen</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-453947</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:35:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/09/27/6097/#comment-453947</guid>
					<description>I love this post btw, I put it on my facebook for everyone I know. I really think everyone i know should read this.

At any rate, I've only ever heard of one gal trying to get pregnant to apparently keep a man and it was a rumour... However, I've known tons of men trying to knock up the gals they were with. One was a friend. She did get pregnant but lost the guy and aborted within the first 8 weeks. This shit does happen. It's completely a control issue. &quot;Insecure man seeks young girl to own and screw around on&quot;. ack. Furthermore I completely agree with what Amanda said about men &quot;always keeping their options open&quot;. For the longest time I couldn't trust a single man because I suspected they were &quot;keeping their options open&quot; rather than being honest. Ah well lucky me, i found a good egg in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I love this post btw, I put it on my facebook for everyone I know. I really think everyone i know should read this.</p>
	<p>At any rate, I&#8217;ve only ever heard of one gal trying to get pregnant to apparently keep a man and it was a rumour&#8230; However, I&#8217;ve known tons of men trying to knock up the gals they were with. One was a friend. She did get pregnant but lost the guy and aborted within the first 8 weeks. This shit does happen. It&#8217;s completely a control issue. &#8220;Insecure man seeks young girl to own and screw around on&#8221;. ack. Furthermore I completely agree with what Amanda said about men &#8220;always keeping their options open&#8221;. For the longest time I couldn&#8217;t trust a single man because I suspected they were &#8220;keeping their options open&#8221; rather than being honest. Ah well lucky me, i found a good egg in the end.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
