<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One of these things is not like the other</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chet</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-445522</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:43:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-445522</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Vick is an EVIL person, and I wish there were a hell because enternity isn’t even enough time for this sadistic monster to rot in it.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, for god's sake. Overreact, much? A few dead dogs is just as bad as, say, 3000 dead Americans on false pretenses? Come on.

I get that many people may find Vick's actions cruel, needless, and possessed of a disregard for the suffering of an animal.

If you eat meat, though, so are &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; actions. Yet you accept that it's ok to needlessly torture and kill pigs for meat, even though you could just as easily live on beans. Suddenly the same mistreatment for entertainment is wrong?

If you do things like:

Go to the zoo
Eat beef and pork
Use animal-tested products
Use medicines or benefit from science

then you've been a part of the vivisection and killing of animals for human purposes.

I don't have a problem with it. I eat meat because it's delicious. A pig is just as smart as a dog and they're hardly raised under better circumstances than some of these dogs (I know, I've visited the barns.) I certainly find animal bloodsports cruel and offensive.

I just don't see why it should be illegal. Vick didn't steal the dogs. That his conduct with them offends some of our consciences doesn't strike me as terribly relevant. You or I may believe that his conduct was a breach of ethics, but clearly he did not; what's society's interest here? Why are dogs better than pigs? If he bought and sold cattle, why would that have been better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Vick is an EVIL person, and I wish there were a hell because enternity isn’t even enough time for this sadistic monster to rot in it.</i></p>
	<p>Oh, for god&#8217;s sake. Overreact, much? A few dead dogs is just as bad as, say, 3000 dead Americans on false pretenses? Come on.</p>
	<p>I get that many people may find Vick&#8217;s actions cruel, needless, and possessed of a disregard for the suffering of an animal.</p>
	<p>If you eat meat, though, so are <i>your</i> actions. Yet you accept that it&#8217;s ok to needlessly torture and kill pigs for meat, even though you could just as easily live on beans. Suddenly the same mistreatment for entertainment is wrong?</p>
	<p>If you do things like:</p>
	<p>Go to the zoo<br />
Eat beef and pork<br />
Use animal-tested products<br />
Use medicines or benefit from science</p>
	<p>then you&#8217;ve been a part of the vivisection and killing of animals for human purposes.</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with it. I eat meat because it&#8217;s delicious. A pig is just as smart as a dog and they&#8217;re hardly raised under better circumstances than some of these dogs (I know, I&#8217;ve visited the barns.) I certainly find animal bloodsports cruel and offensive.</p>
	<p>I just don&#8217;t see why it should be illegal. Vick didn&#8217;t steal the dogs. That his conduct with them offends some of our consciences doesn&#8217;t strike me as terribly relevant. You or I may believe that his conduct was a breach of ethics, but clearly he did not; what&#8217;s society&#8217;s interest here? Why are dogs better than pigs? If he bought and sold cattle, why would that have been better?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phoenician in a time of Romans</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444941</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:45:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444941</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Basically they create this situation where hundreds, sometimes thousands, of creeps linger around the clinic, so when someone crosses the line and shoots a doctor or bombs the place, it’s hard to narrow down who did it, especially if the acts happen (like in Birmingham) in states where the majority of the community is not pleased about abortion rights.
&lt;/i&gt;

Cause and effect, or merely a function of the size of the pool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Basically they create this situation where hundreds, sometimes thousands, of creeps linger around the clinic, so when someone crosses the line and shoots a doctor or bombs the place, it’s hard to narrow down who did it, especially if the acts happen (like in Birmingham) in states where the majority of the community is not pleased about abortion rights.<br />
</i></p>
	<p>Cause and effect, or merely a function of the size of the pool?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amanda Marcotte</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444919</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:28:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444919</guid>
					<description>I think some abortion clinics do use armed guards.  You're right that there's a weird cowardice to it.  Most clinics that get bombed are ones that are staked out the most by largely non-violent protesters.  Basically they create this situation where hundreds, sometimes thousands, of creeps linger around the clinic, so when someone crosses the line and shoots a doctor or bombs the place, it's hard to narrow down who did it, especially if the acts happen (like in Birmingham) in states where the majority of the community is not pleased about abortion rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think some abortion clinics do use armed guards.  You&#8217;re right that there&#8217;s a weird cowardice to it.  Most clinics that get bombed are ones that are staked out the most by largely non-violent protesters.  Basically they create this situation where hundreds, sometimes thousands, of creeps linger around the clinic, so when someone crosses the line and shoots a doctor or bombs the place, it&#8217;s hard to narrow down who did it, especially if the acts happen (like in Birmingham) in states where the majority of the community is not pleased about abortion rights.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phoenician in a time of Romans</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444912</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:07:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444912</guid>
					<description>Of course it's terrorism - but it's a particularly cheap terrorism.  With &quot;real&quot; terrorism, we're at least talking about thugs - people who will go out and shoot weapons into neighbourhoods or bomb marketplaces, but people who are willing to at least engage in some form of risk in pursuit of their fun in killing civilians to prove a point.

Here we're talking about a movement which &lt;b&gt;almost&lt;/b&gt; entirely consists of cowards, which is probably why they're so het up about maintaining control over Teh Evil Womenparts via the law.

Personally, I think they should be met by the maximum amount of intimidation allowed by the law.  Make certain they know &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; have their names and addresses.  If it's legal to publish them, publish them.  Take their photographs - and make sure they know you're taking their photographs. If your State allows the overt display of guns (which I find really, really wierd), make certain their protests always include a bunch of silent watchers carrying guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Of course it&#8217;s terrorism - but it&#8217;s a particularly cheap terrorism.  With &#8220;real&#8221; terrorism, we&#8217;re at least talking about thugs - people who will go out and shoot weapons into neighbourhoods or bomb marketplaces, but people who are willing to at least engage in some form of risk in pursuit of their fun in killing civilians to prove a point.</p>
	<p>Here we&#8217;re talking about a movement which <b>almost</b> entirely consists of cowards, which is probably why they&#8217;re so het up about maintaining control over Teh Evil Womenparts via the law.</p>
	<p>Personally, I think they should be met by the maximum amount of intimidation allowed by the law.  Make certain they know <b>you</b> have their names and addresses.  If it&#8217;s legal to publish them, publish them.  Take their photographs - and make sure they know you&#8217;re taking their photographs. If your State allows the overt display of guns (which I find really, really wierd), make certain their protests always include a bunch of silent watchers carrying guns.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sarah in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444896</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:52:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444896</guid>
					<description>But Phoenician -

It really doesn't matter how many are &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; killed. Because if the garden-variety nutters, who work on the backs of those that DO kill, in increasing their intimidation of women through the fear the women have of being killed, above what their own harassment of these women gives them, then what they are doing is terrorism, just like what the actual killers do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>But Phoenician -</p>
	<p>It really doesn&#8217;t matter how many are <i>actually</i> killed. Because if the garden-variety nutters, who work on the backs of those that DO kill, in increasing their intimidation of women through the fear the women have of being killed, above what their own harassment of these women gives them, then what they are doing is terrorism, just like what the actual killers do.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phoenician in a time of Romans</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444859</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:19:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444859</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;the women are NOT protected from savage, mass murdering, anti-choice terrorists who have bombed abortion clinics non-stop for the last 25 years.&lt;/i&gt;

How many women have they actually murdered?

I get the impression that for every actual nutter who's willing to shed blood, there's a thousand pin-dicked little bastards who cream their undies at the thought of women being scared of them because of the actual nutcases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>the women are NOT protected from savage, mass murdering, anti-choice terrorists who have bombed abortion clinics non-stop for the last 25 years.</i></p>
	<p>How many women have they actually murdered?</p>
	<p>I get the impression that for every actual nutter who&#8217;s willing to shed blood, there&#8217;s a thousand pin-dicked little bastards who cream their undies at the thought of women being scared of them because of the actual nutcases.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Judge Moonbox</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444825</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:05:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444825</guid>
					<description>“How can it be illegal to torture and murder animals while it’s legal to flush out an inch-long embryo?” 

The people who think this way have no problem with Gary Bauer praising then-Governor Bush, who was a serial executioner, for respecting the &quot;Sanctity of Life.&quot; He clearly does not respect the sanctity of the word, &quot;sanctity.&quot; What this shows is the wingnuts' bloated sense of entitlement. They expect us to come a-running when they use the Magic Words, but when it's pointed out that Issue B has a greater claim to that word than Issue A, they won't lift a finger.

I hope I live to see  the day when I can hear politicians and activists talk about &quot;life,&quot; and I can assume they mean Life and not Antiabortionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>“How can it be illegal to torture and murder animals while it’s legal to flush out an inch-long embryo?” </p>
	<p>The people who think this way have no problem with Gary Bauer praising then-Governor Bush, who was a serial executioner, for respecting the &#8220;Sanctity of Life.&#8221; He clearly does not respect the sanctity of the word, &#8220;sanctity.&#8221; What this shows is the wingnuts&#8217; bloated sense of entitlement. They expect us to come a-running when they use the Magic Words, but when it&#8217;s pointed out that Issue B has a greater claim to that word than Issue A, they won&#8217;t lift a finger.</p>
	<p>I hope I live to see  the day when I can hear politicians and activists talk about &#8220;life,&#8221; and I can assume they mean Life and not Antiabortionism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MAJeff, the God of Biscuits</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444804</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:56:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444804</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;No Bible-thumping Bush voter ever blew his load and made an elephant.&lt;/i&gt;

That’s just great.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;THAT'S&lt;/i&gt; sperm magic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p><i>No Bible-thumping Bush voter ever blew his load and made an elephant.</i></p>
	<p>That’s just great.</p></blockquote>
	<p><i>THAT&#8217;S</i> sperm magic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444774</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:15:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444774</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;..fundies refuse to believe that humans are primates and that in the cosmic, universal scheme of things, we are no more important than another terrestrial species.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You don't have to be a fundie to have bought the notion. Millions of atheists have, too.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not so certain that Vick was prosecuted out of some fuzzy and sympathetic need to protect animals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It's not fuzzy or sympathetic, it's an interest in rudimentary ethics. It's a simple concern for suffering. I dislike pets and don't like being around animals in general, but I respect 'em.

&lt;blockquote&gt;..the viscerally disgusting animal torture charges.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Livestock are essentially tortured too. A British court even decided it in a case against McDonald's. All day today animals were tortured, all over the world.

I'm just saying that we should be this outraged &lt;i&gt;every day&lt;/i&gt; over animal rights if we want it to mean anything at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>..fundies refuse to believe that humans are primates and that in the cosmic, universal scheme of things, we are no more important than another terrestrial species.</p></blockquote>
	<p>You don&#8217;t have to be a fundie to have bought the notion. Millions of atheists have, too.</p>
	<blockquote><p>I’m not so certain that Vick was prosecuted out of some fuzzy and sympathetic need to protect animals.</p></blockquote>
	<p>It&#8217;s not fuzzy or sympathetic, it&#8217;s an interest in rudimentary ethics. It&#8217;s a simple concern for suffering. I dislike pets and don&#8217;t like being around animals in general, but I respect &#8216;em.</p>
	<blockquote><p>..the viscerally disgusting animal torture charges.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Livestock are essentially tortured too. A British court even decided it in a case against McDonald&#8217;s. All day today animals were tortured, all over the world.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m just saying that we should be this outraged <i>every day</i> over animal rights if we want it to mean anything at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rose</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444730</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:12:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/08/23/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other/#comment-444730</guid>
					<description>I've been reading so many apologists for Vick.  I don't understand it, and it makes me despair for us as a society.  

Not only is Vick's crime being compared to abortion, it's also being compared to drunk driving and domestic assault, as in, why should he get time for this when some people get away with crimes against humans?

But there's no need for a comparision. A bioterror attack would be worse than dog fighting too, but so what?  How does that minimize what he did? I wouldn't click on the link that was cited above regarding cats, it would make me cry and I can't take it anymore.  Not after I read about how he and cronies would kill the underperforming dogs by HANGING and DROWNING (and I capped that so that those who don't want to think about this 'cause it's &quot;just dogs&quot; get a picture in their heads about what happened to them.  It chills me.  Vick is an EVIL person, and I wish there were a hell because enternity isn't even enough time for this sadistic monster to rot in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve been reading so many apologists for Vick.  I don&#8217;t understand it, and it makes me despair for us as a society.  </p>
	<p>Not only is Vick&#8217;s crime being compared to abortion, it&#8217;s also being compared to drunk driving and domestic assault, as in, why should he get time for this when some people get away with crimes against humans?</p>
	<p>But there&#8217;s no need for a comparision. A bioterror attack would be worse than dog fighting too, but so what?  How does that minimize what he did? I wouldn&#8217;t click on the link that was cited above regarding cats, it would make me cry and I can&#8217;t take it anymore.  Not after I read about how he and cronies would kill the underperforming dogs by HANGING and DROWNING (and I capped that so that those who don&#8217;t want to think about this &#8216;cause it&#8217;s &#8220;just dogs&#8221; get a picture in their heads about what happened to them.  It chills me.  Vick is an EVIL person, and I wish there were a hell because enternity isn&#8217;t even enough time for this sadistic monster to rot in it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
