Comments on: Not a negligee situation?

by: Caitlain

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:42:25 +0100

O’Reilly just absolutely makes my skin crawl. I saw the tape on Olbermann’s show the other night, and it was just painful to watch. Had that been me on the other end of the interview, I’m not sure I could’ve prevented myself from asking him if he had an erection during the interview itself.

by: Richard

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:56:25 +0100

Libertarian: The pictures have been on CNN for over a week now and there is nothing to see in them. Absolutely nothing except Bill Orally’s sick f*cking mind.

by: Kate217, Commiczarina of Cookies

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:14:24 +0100

Sorry, the “HTML Tags” sector of my brain is on vacation today.

by: Kate217, Commiczarina of Cookies

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:13:00 +0100

The Negligee Situation would be a terrific name for an album. Maybe by The Negro Problem. Any group that would name an album "Post Minstrel Syndrome" would be up for it, I think...

by: Sniper

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:20:50 +0100

The Negligee Situation would be a terrific name for an album.

It sounds like a novel named in an Edward Gorey story.

can we just have an olbermann/stewart/colbert tuesday lechery?

Ooh! Could they be…. cavorting?

by: history_mom

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:02:31 +0100

Libertarian: His continued badgering about the “secual” content of the pictures was clearly making her uncomfortable and yet he still kept going after she repeatedly said there was nothing titillating about the pictures. He was indulging in his own sexual fantasies at her expense. If that isn’t creepy to you, then you too are a creepy person.

cest.la.vie: why is it that progressives are always the ones expected to “tone it down” and to “reach across the divide” and engage in “reasoned debate ALL.THE.TIME” ? Sure there is a time for reasoned political analysis but there is also a place for passion too because this shit ACTUALLY MATTERS and isn’t just some intellectual exercise. Sometimes you have to vent your spleen because reasoned discourse is not working.

by: Bill O’s wingnuttery « Notes from Evil Bender

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:15:57 +0100

[…] 4) Anyone who has been paying attention goes back to their lives unsurprised by Bill’s asshater; Bill goes back to masturbating to the thought of rather tame images of Miss New Jersey. […]

by: blondie

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:14:24 +0100

O’Reilly, in other words, “You’re a naughty, dirty little girl who needs to be spanked! Don’t you? You need me to spank you? Oops, sorry about that little bit of drool there.”

by: Amanda Marcotte

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:44:33 +0100

Libertarian, that you can’t see that there’s something creepy about an old man badgering a young woman with hope in his eyes both that she titillates him and that she’s publicly punished for it….

Actually, I’m not surprised you don’t find that creepy.

Weboy, setting the predator catching crap aside, the second part of the segment was pure O’Reilly mockery, nothing to read much into.

by: weboy

Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:40:46 +0100

Without giving O’Reilly any ground (that Miss New Jersey thing, which I saw, was just as odd as it looks), Olberman’s not winning me over here either ; as disturbed as I am about online predators, the creepy, sensationalist approach NBC has taken to it’s “to catch a predator” series is disturbing and uncomfortable. I want online predators caught; I don’t know that I want NBC profiting from it.