Posted by Amanda Marcotte July 19, 2007 in Assholes, Video
This Olbermann segment with a remix of Bill O’Reilly’s drooling, perverted interview with Amy Polumbo is a hoot. Bill can barely conceal his leering excitement at the idea of these pictures, which are, as previously noted here, the dictionary definition of tame silliness.
25 Responses to “Not a negligee situation?”
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Man, iew. You can tell how disappointed he is that these weren’t actually dirty pictures.
Bill Orally is basically a sick f*ck. V*yeur. Ph*ne S*x. Falalfel phreak. Ps*chotic and a whole lot of other disturbing things
That was just creepy.
You could tell he was thinking “there’s got to be at least a cleavage shot in there. Come on. I already need Viagra to get it halfway up, and Limbaugh’s already got the market cornered on Barbara Bush.”
Man, what would Bill Hicks have done with this if he were still alive?
The Negligee Situation would be a terrific name for an album.
That sounds like something you’d say when you got to A&E (Accident and Emergency, in the US: E.R.??). “It’s bad news doctor - the patient has a negligee situation.” And as a medic if you mess up a negligee situation could you be convicted of gross negligeence?
Ok I am not Bill Hicks. I do my best though.
LMAO: what a tool.
“it’s just you and your friends … cavorting?”
[Yes, absolutely … we happened to be prancing through a meadow, as woodnymphs are wont to do and chance’d upon a stream. Needleff to saye … ]
“is it two women?” “could you just give me a hint?”
“dressed up in some dominatrix thing or something like that?”
ROTFLMFAO!!! He’s so down & comfy with the S&M lifestyle … you know, as a seasoned reporter who’s seen it all — done it all [bawm chicka wow wowwww.] in the line of duty to Real America. It’s a thing, you know, the whips, the falafel, whatever.
OT, but if anyone has access to online MP3’s of the Shah of Idiocy reading his hardboiled “Tresspasses” novel, do not pass up the opportunity for some shrieking good quality hammock time.
I particularly enjoyed — well that’s a strong word but hear me out — LMAO’d at his terse delivery during scenes where his alter-ego slash protagonist went where O’Really likely does not go in real life.
I swear, it was like he was barking into the unexplored chamber of the vagina to test for an echo effect. (Hello?? Hello? ‘Zis thing on? [tap tap])
God Bless Talk Soup.
One more reason why I just adore Keith Olbermann! I’m loofahing my ass off!
ROFL
“Is it found around the home? Is it bigger than a breadbox? Is it a loofah?”
Well played, Mr. Olbermann. Well fucking played.
man, i cant even count all the ways i love keith olbermann.
can we just have an olbermann/stewart/colbert tuesday lechery?
id be a terribly happy girl.
I guess I’m one of those rare liberals who isn’t too hip to Keith Olbermann. Not to discredit his position, or the fact that Bill O’Reilly is a great big buffoon– but generally speaking, I don’t feel like Olbermann is making the best use of his opportunities and abilities.
Case in point ^. He’s extremely articulate– which I respect– but he is verbose to such an extreme that I feel like I’m watching a kid who just discovered the thesaurus. It’s overdone and unnecessary, particularly since a) the arguments he’s making speak for themselves, and b) the people watching him already agree with him.
He also does himself a disservice by resorting to juvenile name-calling: aka, “Fathead”. It’s unprofessional, weakens his arguments, and makes him look rather foolish in the eyes of anyone who may not be completely swayed by his statements.
If his goal is to set up a soapbox designed for conservative bashing, then I’d say “Fantastic”– he’s doing a great job. But as it is, he could be using his intelligence and privilege to cross the divide– or at the very least, set an example of an articulate, even-tempered liberal who can rationally defend his views without blustering.
This is like Bush Derangement Syndrome. It’s O’Reilly, so it must be bad. Although in Bush’s case, that’s usually true.
Given the questions asked, it’s obvious the pictures had not yet been released. O’Reilly (who I’m no big supporter of) asked the questions everyone was asking, ie. what is it about these pictures that she could be blackmailed about? Everyone thought there was some “negative” sexual content. It turned out to be a big (little?) nothing.
Olbermann calls it an “unbelievably sexual interview.”
Uh, what was the story about? What did everyone think was in those pictures before they were released?
Haha, you have to love Olbermann almost cracking up as he introduces the segment.
Without giving O’Reilly any ground (that Miss New Jersey thing, which I saw, was just as odd as it looks), Olberman’s not winning me over here either ; as disturbed as I am about online predators, the creepy, sensationalist approach NBC has taken to it’s “to catch a predator” series is disturbing and uncomfortable. I want online predators caught; I don’t know that I want NBC profiting from it.
Libertarian, that you can’t see that there’s something creepy about an old man badgering a young woman with hope in his eyes both that she titillates him and that she’s publicly punished for it….
Actually, I’m not surprised you don’t find that creepy.
Weboy, setting the predator catching crap aside, the second part of the segment was pure O’Reilly mockery, nothing to read much into.
O’Reilly, in other words, “You’re a naughty, dirty little girl who needs to be spanked! Don’t you? You need me to spank you? Oops, sorry about that little bit of drool there.”
[…] 4) Anyone who has been paying attention goes back to their lives unsurprised by Bill’s asshater; Bill goes back to masturbating to the thought of rather tame images of Miss New Jersey. […]
Libertarian: His continued badgering about the “secual” content of the pictures was clearly making her uncomfortable and yet he still kept going after she repeatedly said there was nothing titillating about the pictures. He was indulging in his own sexual fantasies at her expense. If that isn’t creepy to you, then you too are a creepy person.
cest.la.vie: why is it that progressives are always the ones expected to “tone it down” and to “reach across the divide” and engage in “reasoned debate ALL.THE.TIME” ? Sure there is a time for reasoned political analysis but there is also a place for passion too because this shit ACTUALLY MATTERS and isn’t just some intellectual exercise. Sometimes you have to vent your spleen because reasoned discourse is not working.
The Negligee Situation would be a terrific name for an album.
It sounds like a novel named in an Edward Gorey story.
can we just have an olbermann/stewart/colbert tuesday lechery?
Ooh! Could they be…. cavorting?
The Negligee Situation would be a terrific name for an album.
Maybe by The Negro Problem. Any group that would name an album “Post Minstrel Syndrome” would be up for it, I think…
Sorry, the “HTML Tags” sector of my brain is on vacation today.
Libertarian: The pictures have been on CNN for over a week now and there is nothing to see in them. Absolutely nothing except Bill Orally’s sick f*cking mind.
O’Reilly just absolutely makes my skin crawl. I saw the tape on Olbermann’s show the other night, and it was just painful to watch. Had that been me on the other end of the interview, I’m not sure I could’ve prevented myself from asking him if he had an erection during the interview itself.