Comments on: David Vitter trots out wife to cover for him at presser http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/ Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:38:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: Jakob http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-434276 Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:18:14 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-434276 This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title Vitter trots out wife to cover for him at presser at Pandagon. Thanks for informative article This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title Vitter trots out wife to cover for him at presser at Pandagon. Thanks for informative article

]]> by: JackGoff, Droll Jester of Tomatoey Goodness http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433953 Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:46:31 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433953 <i>What you seem to need is a tutor.</i> This, from the person who constantly reads subtexts in everyone's comments that are not there. Interesting, if stupid. What you seem to need is a tutor.

This, from the person who constantly reads subtexts in everyone’s comments that are not there. Interesting, if stupid.

]]> by: six-oh-seven-nine, the giant lion-eating chimp of the magic forest http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433950 Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:36:45 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433950 I just did a quick scoot through some of the comments made about Vitter by his right-wing apologists. A number of them are of the <i>it's a victimless matter involving an activity -- prostitution -- that should be legal anyway!</i> variety. Anybody want to give odds on the likelihood of those right-wingers having the same views on a Dem politician caught with a joint? I just did a quick scoot through some of the comments made about Vitter by his right-wing apologists. A number of them are of the it’s a victimless matter involving an activity — prostitution — that should be legal anyway! variety.

Anybody want to give odds on the likelihood of those right-wingers having the same views on a Dem politician caught with a joint?

]]> by: Foucault http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433905 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:51:02 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433905 I'm sorry: I merely advise you to re-read the post. What you seem to need is a tutor. I’m sorry: I merely advise you to re-read the post. What you seem to need is a tutor.

]]> by: JackGoff, Droll Jester of Tomatoey Goodness http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433893 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:31:18 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433893 <i>Like I said before, please reread Chris Clarke’s post. </i> Chris said something about a prick who repeatedly acts like a prick to other people? Because I read nothing of the kind in his post. Well, have at that interpretation. :-) Like I said before, please reread Chris Clarke’s post.

Chris said something about a prick who repeatedly acts like a prick to other people? Because I read nothing of the kind in his post. Well, have at that interpretation. :-)

]]> by: Foucault http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433859 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:32:29 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433859 Like I said before, please reread Chris Clarke's post. You might learn something that could help you in all walks of life. Like I said before, please reread Chris Clarke’s post. You might learn something that could help you in all walks of life.

]]> by: JackGoff, Droll Jester of Tomatoey Goodness http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433855 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:21:35 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433855 Yeah, that should be the other angle bracket, not the ASCII code. I forgot the semicolon at the end. Yeah, that should be the other angle bracket, not the ASCII code. I forgot the semicolon at the end.

]]> by: JackGoff, Droll Jester of Tomatoey Goodness http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433849 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:56:12 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433849 Crap, I'm in the spamulator. Crap, I’m in the spamulator.

]]> by: JackGoff, Droll Jester of Tomatoey Goodness http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433848 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:55:39 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433848 Let me guess. You are using "&#60;" or "&amp;#062". Makes sense that it isn't showing up. <i>Notice I am not being mean to you now?</i> Mean to me means nothing. I don't care. You being a prick to other people does mean something to me, and you do it repeatedly. Granted, completely tweaking on a comment of mine did make me question your ability to read, specifically because I can't see how you read any of what you did in it, but whatever. But seriously, just stop your horseshit, if you can. Let me guess. You are using “<” or “&#062″. Makes sense that it isn’t showing up.

Notice I am not being mean to you now?

Mean to me means nothing. I don’t care. You being a prick to other people does mean something to me, and you do it repeatedly. Granted, completely tweaking on a comment of mine did make me question your ability to read, specifically because I can’t see how you read any of what you did in it, but whatever. But seriously, just stop your horseshit, if you can.

]]> by: Foucault http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433835 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:18:45 +0100 http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/07/17/david-vitter-trots-out-wife-to-cover-for-him-at-presser/#comment-433835 Perhaps you're annoyed because you lack a sense of humor? :) Notice I am not being mean to you now? See, the happy face indicates that I am being playful. :) I don't know why my little Satanfish icon did not turn out. Let me try it again: Perhaps you’re annoyed because you lack a sense of humor? :)

Notice I am not being mean to you now? See, the happy face indicates that I am being playful. :)

I don’t know why my little Satanfish icon did not turn out. Let me try it again:

]]>