<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banks or bloodsuckers?</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: hp</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414700</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:48:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414700</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I still think this post suffers from a total lack of understanding of how large and diverse the mortgage industry actually is. The anecdote of â€śI went to the bank, and this is all the offered me, so I signedâ€? is so stupid it boggles my mind. This is a HUGE market. Go to another bank. Then go to a broker. Then call a national lender. Then try an internet lender. Tell each one of them that someone else is giving you a better deal. If none of them will give you a better deal, there may be a reason other than race.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We did this. We got quotes from multiple banks, we went to the online sites where they &quot;compete&quot;--and the first offer from any lender we talked with was some exotic bullshit. Say, &quot;no, we want a 30 year fixed&quot; and we got talked and talked and talked at about how the lending agent's pet alternative mortgage is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Until the day we signed our closing papers, the broker we were working with brought STILL up the &quot;well, look what interest rate you could get on an ARM! or this interest-only loan!&quot; 

This was 2004, and we were white, with good credit. Insisting over and over again that we wanted a 30 year fixed (and sticking with our own belief that the 30 year fixed was the best loan for our situation, no matter what sales slime got thrown at us) finally got us a 30 year fixed. But it was an absolute pain in the ass to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>I still think this post suffers from a total lack of understanding of how large and diverse the mortgage industry actually is. The anecdote of â€śI went to the bank, and this is all the offered me, so I signedâ€? is so stupid it boggles my mind. This is a HUGE market. Go to another bank. Then go to a broker. Then call a national lender. Then try an internet lender. Tell each one of them that someone else is giving you a better deal. If none of them will give you a better deal, there may be a reason other than race.</p></blockquote>
	<p>We did this. We got quotes from multiple banks, we went to the online sites where they &#8220;compete&#8221;&#8211;and the first offer from any lender we talked with was some exotic bullshit. Say, &#8220;no, we want a 30 year fixed&#8221; and we got talked and talked and talked at about how the lending agent&#8217;s pet alternative mortgage is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Until the day we signed our closing papers, the broker we were working with brought STILL up the &#8220;well, look what interest rate you could get on an ARM! or this interest-only loan!&#8221; </p>
	<p>This was 2004, and we were white, with good credit. Insisting over and over again that we wanted a 30 year fixed (and sticking with our own belief that the 30 year fixed was the best loan for our situation, no matter what sales slime got thrown at us) finally got us a 30 year fixed. But it was an absolute pain in the ass to get it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sheelzebub</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414672</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:30:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414672</guid>
					<description>And you're missing the many posters in this thread who discuss their own experiences with lenders using high-pressure tactics to get them to go with &quot;alternative&quot; loans. 

And frankly, it says a lot that the *first* option offered to people of color with good credit is some sort of BS &quot;exotic&quot; loan, yet if you're White with the same credit, you're more likely to get a traditional mortgage.  

This is a HUGE market, yes.  But it's also a homogenized market.  IOW, there are plenty of places to go and get the same offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And you&#8217;re missing the many posters in this thread who discuss their own experiences with lenders using high-pressure tactics to get them to go with &#8220;alternative&#8221; loans. </p>
	<p>And frankly, it says a lot that the *first* option offered to people of color with good credit is some sort of BS &#8220;exotic&#8221; loan, yet if you&#8217;re White with the same credit, you&#8217;re more likely to get a traditional mortgage.  </p>
	<p>This is a HUGE market, yes.  But it&#8217;s also a homogenized market.  IOW, there are plenty of places to go and get the same offer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grilltacular</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414593</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:42:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414593</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Minorities preferentially take out these shitty loans? No. Thatâ€™s the whole point of the data Sheelzebub was citing: minorities who have the same credit scores as white people who get regular loans donâ€™t get offered the lower-cost versions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Did I say they &lt;i&gt;prefer&lt;/i&gt; the shitty loan? I only said what the data said: That they are more likely to get a shitty loan. 
Now, can you tell me in the data where it says that minorities don't get &lt;i&gt;offered&lt;/i&gt; the lower cost versions? What does the data *really* say?

I still think this post suffers from a total lack of understanding of how large and diverse the mortgage industry actually is. The anecdote of &quot;I went to the bank, and this is all the offered me, so I signed&quot; is so stupid it boggles my mind. This is a HUGE market. Go to another bank. Then go to a broker. Then call a national lender. Then try an internet lender. Tell each one of them that someone else is giving you a better deal. If none of them will give you a better deal, there may be a reason other than race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>Minorities preferentially take out these shitty loans? No. Thatâ€™s the whole point of the data Sheelzebub was citing: minorities who have the same credit scores as white people who get regular loans donâ€™t get offered the lower-cost versions.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Did I say they <i>prefer</i> the shitty loan? I only said what the data said: That they are more likely to get a shitty loan.<br />
Now, can you tell me in the data where it says that minorities don&#8217;t get <i>offered</i> the lower cost versions? What does the data *really* say?</p>
	<p>I still think this post suffers from a total lack of understanding of how large and diverse the mortgage industry actually is. The anecdote of &#8220;I went to the bank, and this is all the offered me, so I signed&#8221; is so stupid it boggles my mind. This is a HUGE market. Go to another bank. Then go to a broker. Then call a national lender. Then try an internet lender. Tell each one of them that someone else is giving you a better deal. If none of them will give you a better deal, there may be a reason other than race.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ShortWoman&raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Shorties of Dr. Caligari</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414300</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414300</guid>
					<description>[...] Connecting the dots: Insight on how predatory lenders not only destroyed neighborhoods, discriminated against non-whites, contributed to the current default/forclosure rates, destroyed the financial security of families, and on top of all that fed (if not caused) regional real estate bubbles. I have yet to see so many strands woven so skillfully into the real estate issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Connecting the dots: Insight on how predatory lenders not only destroyed neighborhoods, discriminated against non-whites, contributed to the current default/forclosure rates, destroyed the financial security of families, and on top of all that fed (if not caused) regional real estate bubbles. I have yet to see so many strands woven so skillfully into the real estate issue. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Petey Wheatstraw</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414267</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:28:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414267</guid>
					<description>I find it unsettling that I actually agree with &lt;b&gt;Moira&lt;/b&gt;.

I've been thinking about this as a personal responsibility issue since the last time we discussed lending.  I still believe that a lot of people get fucked by their sweet-deal mortgage because they try to hustle the house.  But the house also lies and cheats, in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I find it unsettling that I actually agree with <b>Moira</b>.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about this as a personal responsibility issue since the last time we discussed lending.  I still believe that a lot of people get fucked by their sweet-deal mortgage because they try to hustle the house.  But the house also lies and cheats, in this case.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: stryx</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414213</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:40:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414213</guid>
					<description>Like paul said, t's not like this type of thing hasn't happened before....

Lift the boot of oppression off the throat of the persecuted banking industry and things get crazy. Suit clad grifters move in and all of a sudden one of the most boring stable investments becomes something that looks like it was created by wealthy tweakers. 

Ohio, once again, had an actual bank panic in 1985 over the mismanagement of the finances of one S&amp;amp;L chain. We're all still stuck with an old school vet from the fiasco called the Keating 5: John McCain. Silverado S&amp;amp;L ended up costing taxpayers over a billion dollars, yet Neil Bush is still not in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Like paul said, t&#8217;s not like this type of thing hasn&#8217;t happened before&#8230;.</p>
	<p>Lift the boot of oppression off the throat of the persecuted banking industry and things get crazy. Suit clad grifters move in and all of a sudden one of the most boring stable investments becomes something that looks like it was created by wealthy tweakers. </p>
	<p>Ohio, once again, had an actual bank panic in 1985 over the mismanagement of the finances of one S&amp;L chain. We&#8217;re all still stuck with an old school vet from the fiasco called the Keating 5: John McCain. Silverado S&amp;L ended up costing taxpayers over a billion dollars, yet Neil Bush is still not in jail.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paul</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414198</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:17:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414198</guid>
					<description>To a great extent I think the collapse of bank regulation is a generational thing. Until the mid-80s, the people in charge of regulating banks had been through the Great Depression and had seen what unfettered idiots in the financial industry could do. The S&amp;amp;L fiasco (which happened partly because S&amp;amp;L's managed to evade most regulation) was the first sign of senescence. Since then it's only gotten worse, with all the smart boys thinking it can't happen here, or that they'll be exempt from the troubles if it does.

(And, as I think I mentioned earlier, it's not just regulation once, but ongoing regulation. Because every time you put a rule in place it's some bright, well-paid person's job to figure out how to make more money by finding a way around it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>To a great extent I think the collapse of bank regulation is a generational thing. Until the mid-80s, the people in charge of regulating banks had been through the Great Depression and had seen what unfettered idiots in the financial industry could do. The S&amp;L fiasco (which happened partly because S&amp;L&#8217;s managed to evade most regulation) was the first sign of senescence. Since then it&#8217;s only gotten worse, with all the smart boys thinking it can&#8217;t happen here, or that they&#8217;ll be exempt from the troubles if it does.</p>
	<p>(And, as I think I mentioned earlier, it&#8217;s not just regulation once, but ongoing regulation. Because every time you put a rule in place it&#8217;s some bright, well-paid person&#8217;s job to figure out how to make more money by finding a way around it.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Linnaeus</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414036</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:14:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414036</guid>
					<description>I grew up in the Detroit area, and though I haven't lived there in 10 years, I still have a pretty good network of contacts there.  This situation, though affecting minority borrowers more, is present throughout the metropolitan Detroit area.  A good friend of mine is about two paychecks away from losing his house a couple of years after he opted for creative financing.

The economic situation in the area is only exacerbating the problem.  The housing market there is teetering on the precipice, if it's not in collapse already, and there doesn't seem to be a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I grew up in the Detroit area, and though I haven&#8217;t lived there in 10 years, I still have a pretty good network of contacts there.  This situation, though affecting minority borrowers more, is present throughout the metropolitan Detroit area.  A good friend of mine is about two paychecks away from losing his house a couple of years after he opted for creative financing.</p>
	<p>The economic situation in the area is only exacerbating the problem.  The housing market there is teetering on the precipice, if it&#8217;s not in collapse already, and there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a solution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MikeEss</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414008</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:14:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414008</guid>
					<description>Regulation?  REGULATION?

Sheelzebub, are you just TRYING to piss off the Invisible Hand?  

You want us all to suffer and die in poverty when the Invisible Hand is driven off to some other country because we dared to bring in &quot;Regulation&quot;?

What are you, some kind of communist?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Regulation?  REGULATION?</p>
	<p>Sheelzebub, are you just TRYING to piss off the Invisible Hand?  </p>
	<p>You want us all to suffer and die in poverty when the Invisible Hand is driven off to some other country because we dared to bring in &#8220;Regulation&#8221;?</p>
	<p>What are you, some kind of communist?&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sheelzebub</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414005</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:08:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/04/banks-or-bloodsuckers/#comment-414005</guid>
					<description>One thing I think would help the situation is to reintroduce the concept of regulation--something that got wiped out over the past twenty years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One thing I think would help the situation is to reintroduce the concept of regulation&#8211;something that got wiped out over the past twenty years or so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

