<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alabama sex toy case heads to court again</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mercurial Georgia</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405602</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 02:52:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405602</guid>
					<description>I wince at what could happen when the glass breaks.

I like the idea of silicon much better, it's supposed to warm up, at least it's what this seller's site said:

http://jackhammerjesus.ytmnd.com/
&quot;Jesus was a carpenter, now he's a powertool&quot;

I know the religious figures are actually on the handle side &quot;The Jackhammer Jesus has just one safety rule: feet first, feet first, not the head, ya fool.&quot;, but before I knew that and when I first heard of it, my first thought was; &quot;This is where Buddha would definitely be more popular than Jesus!&quot;

Oh oh oh!  It's not a sex toy!  It's a religious icon!  I demand my right to worship my religion!

- MG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wince at what could happen when the glass breaks.</p>
	<p>I like the idea of silicon much better, it&#8217;s supposed to warm up, at least it&#8217;s what this seller&#8217;s site said:</p>
	<p><a href='http://jackhammerjesus.ytmnd.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://jackhammerjesus.ytmnd.com/</a><br />
&#8220;Jesus was a carpenter, now he&#8217;s a powertool&#8221;</p>
	<p>I know the religious figures are actually on the handle side &#8220;The Jackhammer Jesus has just one safety rule: feet first, feet first, not the head, ya fool.&#8221;, but before I knew that and when I first heard of it, my first thought was; &#8220;This is where Buddha would definitely be more popular than Jesus!&#8221;</p>
	<p>Oh oh oh!  It&#8217;s not a sex toy!  It&#8217;s a religious icon!  I demand my right to worship my religion!</p>
	<p>- MG
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: El Mocho</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405223</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:55:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405223</guid>
					<description>Curses, I hate to waltz in late on a good sex toy thread, but legal disputes like this often highlight things that interest me within the industry. As my girlfriend has observed, I'm more than a hobbyist in this area, whether by Texas legal classification or otherwise. 

For awhile, the &quot;novelty&quot; classification was a wink-and-nudge way to get around laws forbidding selling sexual material. This has led to a fairly deregulated industry: Since they weren't actually selling devices for sex, but novelties, they could put whatever they wanted into the mixture. This has both industrial, cost-saving benefits-- cheap materials since it's for sinful sex toys-- and proprietary ones: Some companies keep a lid on their formulas so no one can replicate their fake flesh. 

It's taken awhile, pretty much by word-of-mouth over the Internet--by my observation-- for people to start noticing and lobbying.  Other companies work in neutral materials like silicone, glass and acrylic. Adam &amp;amp; Eve, a big distributor, recently announced they'd not be selling toys containing pthalates, substances which got phased out of children's toys a few years ago.

Then again, given laws like this, I'm not sure I want the government regulating the sex toy industry, even though lack of intervention has allowed cheap and dangerous stuff to flourish.

On another interesting side note, mentioning glass and water pipes: I know there's been federal intervention to some glass manufacturers-- Tommy Chong springs to mind. Then, over the last few years, I've noticed a lot more glass sex toys. I've often wondered if those artisans, fearful for getting busted over pipes, just turned their talents to similar phallic creations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Curses, I hate to waltz in late on a good sex toy thread, but legal disputes like this often highlight things that interest me within the industry. As my girlfriend has observed, I&#8217;m more than a hobbyist in this area, whether by Texas legal classification or otherwise. </p>
	<p>For awhile, the &#8220;novelty&#8221; classification was a wink-and-nudge way to get around laws forbidding selling sexual material. This has led to a fairly deregulated industry: Since they weren&#8217;t actually selling devices for sex, but novelties, they could put whatever they wanted into the mixture. This has both industrial, cost-saving benefits&#8211; cheap materials since it&#8217;s for sinful sex toys&#8211; and proprietary ones: Some companies keep a lid on their formulas so no one can replicate their fake flesh. </p>
	<p>It&#8217;s taken awhile, pretty much by word-of-mouth over the Internet&#8211;by my observation&#8211; for people to start noticing and lobbying.  Other companies work in neutral materials like silicone, glass and acrylic. Adam &amp; Eve, a big distributor, recently announced they&#8217;d not be selling toys containing pthalates, substances which got phased out of children&#8217;s toys a few years ago.</p>
	<p>Then again, given laws like this, I&#8217;m not sure I want the government regulating the sex toy industry, even though lack of intervention has allowed cheap and dangerous stuff to flourish.</p>
	<p>On another interesting side note, mentioning glass and water pipes: I know there&#8217;s been federal intervention to some glass manufacturers&#8211; Tommy Chong springs to mind. Then, over the last few years, I&#8217;ve noticed a lot more glass sex toys. I&#8217;ve often wondered if those artisans, fearful for getting busted over pipes, just turned their talents to similar phallic creations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Djinna</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405179</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:51:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405179</guid>
					<description>Crap, took me three readings to realize that Resident Alien was talking about fireARMS not fireWORKS.  Guess I've blown my reading comprehension budget for the day with the Falwell thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Crap, took me three readings to realize that Resident Alien was talking about fireARMS not fireWORKS.  Guess I&#8217;ve blown my reading comprehension budget for the day with the Falwell thread.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405127</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:34:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405127</guid>
					<description>Ha Ha Bonnie! &lt;i&gt;* hand up for prima facie intent to distribute *&lt;/i&gt;

You beat me to it. I must have the intent of opening a drive-thru shoppe. 

That was fun, I got to use two ridiculous words at once. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ha Ha Bonnie! <i>* hand up for prima facie intent to distribute *</i></p>
	<p>You beat me to it. I must have the intent of opening a drive-thru shoppe. </p>
	<p>That was fun, I got to use two ridiculous words at once. <img src='http://pandagon.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gun- and dildo-positive six-oh-seven-nine</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405126</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:32:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405126</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I don’t think anyone’s ever wanked themselves to death…&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Nor walked into a public place and wanked a couple dozen innocent people to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>&#8220;I don’t think anyone’s ever wanked themselves to death…&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>Nor walked into a public place and wanked a couple dozen innocent people to death.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Djinna</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405112</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:47:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405112</guid>
					<description>Oh, there's plenty of states that forbid the sale of fireworks.  GA bans the sale of both sex toys and fireworks, AL bans only sex toys, and has many large firework stores.  There are sex toy stores in both, but they're sold as &quot;adult novelties,&quot; whereas they don't have to pretend that fireworks will be sold for anything other than their obvious stated purpose.  I've got a comment in moderation on a similar &quot;adult novelty&quot; category that gets sold under the same wink-and-nod as long as you don't mention the REAL purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, there&#8217;s plenty of states that forbid the sale of fireworks.  GA bans the sale of both sex toys and fireworks, AL bans only sex toys, and has many large firework stores.  There are sex toy stores in both, but they&#8217;re sold as &#8220;adult novelties,&#8221; whereas they don&#8217;t have to pretend that fireworks will be sold for anything other than their obvious stated purpose.  I&#8217;ve got a comment in moderation on a similar &#8220;adult novelty&#8221; category that gets sold under the same wink-and-nod as long as you don&#8217;t mention the REAL purpose.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Djinna</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405109</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:41:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405109</guid>
					<description>Back when I lived in Atlanta, I went to one of the many &quot;adult novelty&quot; stores with a friend, who had only recently moved to the state.  Looking around at all the &quot;water pipes&quot; and other smoking devices, she whispered to me, &quot;Don't they ever get busted for selling this stuff?&quot;  I explained, yes, that particular chain got busted on a fairly regular basis, just not for the &quot;tobacco&quot; products, but for all the dildos, vibrators, etc.  She was completely shocked, given what an easy target drug paraphernalia is for law enforcement.  It's sad when the only thing that will get some women off (and is a fun part of many a healthy relationship) is considered even lower on the totem pole than bongs.  Women are lower even than drug users.  That can't possibly reflect the priorities of the average person, can it?  Wait, don't answer that question, I don't want to know.

As far as actual availability of toys, haven't seen much difference b/t living in GA and AL and places that don't have these dumb laws anymore, with the exception that not all sex stores in sane states also carry a large selection of &quot;tobacco&quot; products.  Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Back when I lived in Atlanta, I went to one of the many &#8220;adult novelty&#8221; stores with a friend, who had only recently moved to the state.  Looking around at all the &#8220;water pipes&#8221; and other smoking devices, she whispered to me, &#8220;Don&#8217;t they ever get busted for selling this stuff?&#8221;  I explained, yes, that particular chain got busted on a fairly regular basis, just not for the &#8220;tobacco&#8221; products, but for all the dildos, vibrators, etc.  She was completely shocked, given what an easy target drug paraphernalia is for law enforcement.  It&#8217;s sad when the only thing that will get some women off (and is a fun part of many a healthy relationship) is considered even lower on the totem pole than bongs.  Women are lower even than drug users.  That can&#8217;t possibly reflect the priorities of the average person, can it?  Wait, don&#8217;t answer that question, I don&#8217;t want to know.</p>
	<p>As far as actual availability of toys, haven&#8217;t seen much difference b/t living in GA and AL and places that don&#8217;t have these dumb laws anymore, with the exception that not all sex stores in sane states also carry a large selection of &#8220;tobacco&#8221; products.  Go figure.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: resident_alien</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405098</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:25:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405098</guid>
					<description>Am I getting this right?There are states in your country that will ban the sale of sex toys,while there are no states in your country that will ban the sale of firearms?!?(shakes head,covers face with hands)I don't think anyone's ever wanked themselves to death...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Am I getting this right?There are states in your country that will ban the sale of sex toys,while there are no states in your country that will ban the sale of firearms?!?(shakes head,covers face with hands)I don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s ever wanked themselves to death&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wayward</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405080</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 08:16:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-405080</guid>
					<description>The most amazing thing is that these states actually make South Carolina look progressive.

Maybe I should open a fireworks and sex toy stand at the state line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The most amazing thing is that these states actually make South Carolina look progressive.</p>
	<p>Maybe I should open a fireworks and sex toy stand at the state line&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MikeEss</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-404979</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 22:59:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/alabama-sex-toy-case-heads-to-court-again/#comment-404979</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;When having dildos is criminal, only criminals will have dildos!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

When having dildos is criminal, the politicians ARE dildos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>&#8220;When having dildos is criminal, only criminals will have dildos!&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>When having dildos is criminal, the politicians ARE dildos&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
