<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerPoint, the next word in spreading anti-sex hysteria</title>
	<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ZenGal</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-271334</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-271334</guid>
					<description>Who knew!? I guess I'll have to expect my husband to turn gay sometime in the future. Women should NEVER be made to feel ashamed for taking control of their own sexuality. 

Way to set women's reproductive freedoms/health back another century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Who knew!? I guess I&#8217;ll have to expect my husband to turn gay sometime in the future. Women should NEVER be made to feel ashamed for taking control of their own sexuality. </p>
	<p>Way to set women&#8217;s reproductive freedoms/health back another century.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seanly</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-271168</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-271168</guid>
					<description>I think the thing that really &amp;amp; deeply offends me is that is one of the worst Powerpoint slides I have ever seen. Way too much writing on it.  Title and three bullet points with six words or less! He should have concise statements &amp;amp; then use his talk to explain the rest of his mysoginistic psuedo-scientific BS. Geeze, it's wordy even as a poster...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the thing that really &amp; deeply offends me is that is one of the worst Powerpoint slides I have ever seen. Way too much writing on it.  Title and three bullet points with six words or less! He should have concise statements &amp; then use his talk to explain the rest of his mysoginistic psuedo-scientific BS. Geeze, it&#8217;s wordy even as a poster&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JimMA</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-268786</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-268786</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So what happens if after the Purity Ball daddy uses his â€ścoveredâ€? property a few times before he sells it off to some snot nosed fundie guy for marriage. . . Does that use up all the ocytocin or is that spared since the whole thing is ordained by god?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

An excellent question, since as we discover in the PZ Meyers post:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Keroack doesn't seem to have published anything on [hot mamas blowing out their 'Tocin receptors] in the peer-reviewed literature, eitherâ€”the only source cited for it is something called &quot;A Special Report from the Abstinence Medical Council&quot;. Strangely, the only instances Google turns up of this &quot;Abstinence Medical Council&quot; is as the publisher of this report, and as a part of the Abstinence Clearinghouse, run by Leslee Unruh, unqualified hack &lt;b&gt;(and also organizer of creepy &quot;purity balls&quot;).&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You just KNEW there had to be a connection, didn't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>So what happens if after the Purity Ball daddy uses his â€ścoveredâ€? property a few times before he sells it off to some snot nosed fundie guy for marriage. . . Does that use up all the ocytocin or is that spared since the whole thing is ordained by god?</p></blockquote>
	<p>An excellent question, since as we discover in the PZ Meyers post:</p>
	<blockquote><p>Keroack doesn&#8217;t seem to have published anything on [hot mamas blowing out their &#8216;Tocin receptors] in the peer-reviewed literature, eitherâ€”the only source cited for it is something called &#8220;A Special Report from the Abstinence Medical Council&#8221;. Strangely, the only instances Google turns up of this &#8220;Abstinence Medical Council&#8221; is as the publisher of this report, and as a part of the Abstinence Clearinghouse, run by Leslee Unruh, unqualified hack <b>(and also organizer of creepy &#8220;purity balls&#8221;).</b></p></blockquote>
	<p>You just KNEW there had to be a connection, didn&#8217;t you?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Links&#8230; &laquo; 4&amp;20 blackbirds</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-268548</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-268548</guid>
					<description>[...] Remember the anti-reproduction-rights hack the Bush administration appointed to the &amp;#8220;population affairs&amp;#8221; in the Office of Family Planning? Dr. Eric Keroack. Well, the dude has a nutty powerpoint presentation aimed at children to show that women who have a lot of sex can&amp;#8217;t fall in love. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Remember the anti-reproduction-rights hack the Bush administration appointed to the &#8220;population affairs&#8221; in the Office of Family Planning? Dr. Eric Keroack. Well, the dude has a nutty powerpoint presentation aimed at children to show that women who have a lot of sex can&#8217;t fall in love. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rickhavoc</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-267059</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-267059</guid>
					<description>&quot;Then what causes lesbianism?&quot;

Dr. Eric Keroack.

Thank you...thank you very much...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Then what causes lesbianism?&#8221;</p>
	<p>Dr. Eric Keroack.</p>
	<p>Thank you&#8230;thank you very much&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Koneko</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-266817</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-266817</guid>
					<description>This idea seems about as well thought out as when a male friend of mine stated that he didn't &quot;approve&quot; of women getting clitoral hood piercings, because apparently women only have a finite number of orgasms so they would be used up quickly. I stared at him, and said, &quot;no. just...no&quot; He had the smallest of excuses in that he was an ex-crackhead stoner with no kind of education regarding physiology whatsoever. We're not exactly friends anymore.

This guy has nothing, absolutly nothing to excuse his statements of OBVIOUS lies. But it's good to know that he views us &quot;wimins&quot; to be so stupid as to believe his drivel. Please, please put him in charge of my uterus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This idea seems about as well thought out as when a male friend of mine stated that he didn&#8217;t &#8220;approve&#8221; of women getting clitoral hood piercings, because apparently women only have a finite number of orgasms so they would be used up quickly. I stared at him, and said, &#8220;no. just&#8230;no&#8221; He had the smallest of excuses in that he was an ex-crackhead stoner with no kind of education regarding physiology whatsoever. We&#8217;re not exactly friends anymore.</p>
	<p>This guy has nothing, absolutly nothing to excuse his statements of OBVIOUS lies. But it&#8217;s good to know that he views us &#8220;wimins&#8221; to be so stupid as to believe his drivel. Please, please put him in charge of my uterus!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: carrie</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-265345</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-265345</guid>
					<description>i think you need to shrink your slides down enough so you can make a t-shirt. i was laughing so hard i almost fell out of my chair. and then i went and sent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.now.org/issues/reproductive/hhs_keroack_petition.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this email&lt;/a&gt;, though i'm sure no one will read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i think you need to shrink your slides down enough so you can make a t-shirt. i was laughing so hard i almost fell out of my chair. and then i went and sent <a href="http://www.now.org/issues/reproductive/hhs_keroack_petition.html" rel="nofollow">this email</a>, though i&#8217;m sure no one will read it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AiKiCrow</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-264224</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-264224</guid>
					<description>So the essence of his hormone glue theory is that the more sexual stimuation a woman has had before you, the less likely that she will be satisfied with fucking only you? So if you can't prove that your girlfreind is a vergin then you better not trust/love/or respect  her. But think, what if my church approved vergin has been secretly stimulating herself?!
Oh no, now she will never be able to love me because of painfull huanting memories of all the times she vainly sought love and approval from her showerhead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So the essence of his hormone glue theory is that the more sexual stimuation a woman has had before you, the less likely that she will be satisfied with fucking only you? So if you can&#8217;t prove that your girlfreind is a vergin then you better not trust/love/or respect  her. But think, what if my church approved vergin has been secretly stimulating herself?!<br />
Oh no, now she will never be able to love me because of painfull huanting memories of all the times she vainly sought love and approval from her showerhead!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lawrence Krubner</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-264209</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-264209</guid>
					<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;Can we please not be so (ugh) â€ślookistâ€?, Lawrence? &lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I wasn't defining attractiveness in physical terms. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I did repeat that point twice though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;<i>Can we please not be so (ugh) â€ślookistâ€?, Lawrence? </i>&#8221;</p>
	<p>I wasn&#8217;t defining attractiveness in physical terms. Sorry if that wasn&#8217;t clear. I did repeat that point twice though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phoenician in a time of Romans</title>
		<link>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-264184</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/11/19/new-improved-horseshit-slideshow/#comment-264184</guid>
					<description>Can we please not be so (ugh) &quot;lookist&quot;, Lawrence?  I'm a moderately unattractive male, and I don't share any of Dr Keroack's mental problems (I have bright shiny ones of my own, mind).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Can we please not be so (ugh) &#8220;lookist&#8221;, Lawrence?  I&#8217;m a moderately unattractive male, and I don&#8217;t share any of Dr Keroack&#8217;s mental problems (I have bright shiny ones of my own, mind).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
