Via Angelica, a couple of articles from Nir Rosen on the Iraqi occupation. The first describes his unique insights into Iraq as someone who, due to his middle-eastern complexion, can pass as an Iraqi.
My skin color and language skills allowed me to relate to the American occupier in a different way, for he looked at me as if I were just another haji, the “gook� of the war in Iraq. I first realized my advantage in April 2003, when I was sitting with a group of American soldiers and another soldier walked up and wondered what this haji (me) had done to get arrested by them. Later that summer I walked in the direction of an American tank and heard one soldier say about me, “That’s the biggest fuckin’ Iraqi (pronounced eye-raki) I ever saw.� A soldier by the gun said, “I don’t care how big he is, if he doesn’t stop movin’ I’m gonna shoot him.�
I was lucky enough to have an American passport in my pocket, which I promptly took out and waved, shouting: “Don’t shoot! I’m an American!â€? It was my first encounter with hostile American checkpoints but hardly my last, and I grew to fear the unpredictable American military, which could kill me for looking like an Iraqi male of fighting age. Countless Iraqis were not lucky enough to speak American English or carry a U.S. passport, and often entire families were killed in their cars when they approached American checkpoints. […]
Imagine. The American occupation of Iraq has lasted over three years. The above stories are based on my two weeks with one unit in a small part of the country. Imagine how many Iraqi homes have been destroyed. How many families have been traumatized. How many men have disappeared into American military vehicles in the night. How many crimes have been committed against the Iraqi people every single day in the course of the normal operations of the occupation, when soldiers were merely doing their duty, when they were not angry or vengeful as in Haditha. Imagine what we have done to the Iraqi people, tortured by Saddam for years, then released from three decades of his bloody rule only to find their hope stolen from them and a new terror unleashed.
The other is the story of a U.S. soldier who served in Iraq, as told to Rosen.
I sympathized with what must have been his painful realization that he had inadvertently committed crimes. “All the way up to my third deployment I was an avid reader of a lot of foolish writing on the war,� he said. “I believed in the mission because I had to—after all, what soldier wants to die for an unworthy cause? I wanted to believe in the propaganda and I willfully avoided things that harshly rubbed against my hope that we were sacrificing for a good cause. When you put your life on the line every night, you don’t have the luxury to be skeptical or even critical. In certain ways, I feel embarrassed about my belief that this was once a noble mission, but I have the honesty to admit that I was wrong. I deployed to this war with many great assumptions about our national leadership: I assumed that the WMD intelligence case wasn’t a cherry-picked house of cards, I assumed we had a plan for the aftermath of the invasion, I assumed our leaders had a greater understanding of the character of Iraq outside the mouths of Ahmed Chalabi and Kana Makiya. I assumed, I assumed, I assumed.�
“As a soldier trained exclusively to fight, destroy and capture,� my friend said, “I was no more different than any of the rest of the men in my platoon who viewed Iraq as a broken country, loaded with assassins and inhospitable people. Hardly any of us spoke Arabic, which added to the dehumanization of the people (or should I say, ‘targets’) that we hunted and disrupted on a nightly basis; during my time there we conducted over 140 missions. We were always decent to the men we captured, but a raid by definition can never be a humanitarian act. I could never escape the impression from our heavy-handed insertions into hundreds of family homes that our presence only fueled more and more hatred. Every night we returned to base, the adrenaline rush faded and everything in hindsight looked like a black comedy. You couldn’t escape the fact that our actions only fueled the insurgency. For every insurgent or jihadist we caught, we created two times as many future fighters. And that is the tragedy— good men inadvertently pissing off an entire population. As our fearless leaders walked into this debacle without a plan, you can rest assured that few at the top ever considered the historical meaning of occupation to Arab civilization. Also, the White House fixation on figureheads like Zarqawi, which bolstered the Al Qaeda/Iraq smokescreen, ensured that our myopic obsession with foreign fighters blinded us to the understanding that 90% of the insurgency was home-grown.�
There’s not really anything one can add to these reports, and their terrible poignancy. I can’t even believe we were stupid enough to get into this mess, that we were stupid enough to let it happen. George W. Bush and other Washington politicians, Republican and their Democratic enablers alike, need to stop playing partisan politics with this issue. Only those with political gain to be made by saying otherwise can refuse to see the obvious moral and strategic imperative of ceasing this continued destructive dance upon this heap of wreckage. We can not fix this. We can only make it worse.
2 Responses to “Some Lessons Will Never Be Learned”
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>






The people who caused this need to be held accountable. Unfortunately the Democrats lack the will to do what needs to be done, namely pin this firmly on the individuals who made it happen and work to ensure that not only are they removed from power, but also that their credibility is permanently destroyed. As long as they are able to work behind the scenes to place blame where it doesn’t belong they will be able to plot a return to power. The neocons need to be marginalized to the point where even right wing think tanks will hesitate before employing them.
The slight logic error in your statement, togolosh, is that it implies that the DemocratsTwo issues with that, togolosh:
1. A lot of the Iraq War architects need not only to be removed from office and discredited, but they need to face a war crimes tribunal and likely rot in prison for the rest of their lives.
2. If the Democrats actually went after those who made this war happen, they’d end up having to purge a sizable percentage of their own, too. That’s why the Democrats will never truly take action to punish those responsible for this atrocity. They’d be putting their own necks in the noose — literally.