Ampersand has a link to it on his blogroll under the LGBTQ heading, if I screwed up the link (in which case I made another one, presumeably with the same mistakes).

The shirts need arrows. Other than that, though, yes, it’s hilarious.

Which would mean something if those types didn’t value blind loyalty over having an opinion anyway.

Scrambling to read and respond, both somewhat intelligently, whilst in a hurry to finish up and get to class on time, is not the best of ideas, I think.

Does that mean that I’m anti-choice, ‘cause all 4 of my kids are boys? (unless wife # 1 lied about the milk-deliveries)

DArn, and I thought arguing with the ZPG folks was a bummer…

Epistemology —
That stat coule be partly because there are more Roman Catholics than protestants (I don’t really class the “Fundasmentalist” brands to be “protestant,” but another ball of string entirely)

Alsis —
I still have trouble getting my mind around someone who professes to be a Roman Catholic *and* professes to be “libertarian” (other than “civil libertarian”). The core teachings of the two are just so contradictory…

Foolish Owl —
Your experience about the “bused-in” pro-life troops validates something I’ve suspected — among the ranks of the younger marchers involved in pro-choice vs anti-choice I believe that a much larger percentage of those at the pro-choice events are there because *they* choose to participate, rather than because they were *told* they were going by those ion power over them.

(I haven’t had to stack comments that way in a while — your comment threads get too big too quick…)

I read this as meaning that Kyra, too, thought this was antichoice protestor but one who appeared to be prolife at first glance. (sorry to Kyra if I was misunderstanding you!) I was under the impression that this was an antichoice protestor, and I wanted to know what statement she was trying to make. So, to answer your question, yes, slapping a piece of tape over a woman’s mouth does evoke tyranny. I was trying to understand how it could be construed any other way. I think the trolls on here have made you a little edgey? Or maybe I am just too sleepy to have asked my question well.

I thought it was a pro-choice protester making the point that the “pro-life” agenda silences women, as effectively as a piece of duct tape over the mouth. Sorry if “on our side” was a bit ambiguous, but this is a pro-choice blog, and if I’d been a pro-lifer I’d have said “on my side.”

I don’t really get what the pro-lifers are trying to say with it. Possibly they represent silenced fetuses?

Goddammit I mistyped, I was sleepy. It should read antichoice then prochoice. Geez, ok, sleepy posting apparently is as dangerous as drunk posting.